Investigation of historical severe storms and storm tides in the German Bight with century reanalysis data

Elke M. I. Meyer, L. Gaslikova
{"title":"Investigation of historical severe storms and storm tides in the German Bight with century reanalysis data","authors":"Elke M. I. Meyer, L. Gaslikova","doi":"10.5194/nhess-24-481-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Century reanalysis models offer a possibility to investigate extreme events and gain further insights into their impact through numerical experiments. This paper is a comprehensive summary of historical hazardous storm tides in the German Bight (southern North Sea) with the aim of comparing and evaluating the potential of different century reanalysis data to be used for the reconstruction of extreme water levels. The composite analysis of historical water level extremes, underlying atmospheric situations and their uncertainties may further support decision-making on coastal protection and risk assessment. The analysis is done based on the results of the regional hydrodynamic model simulations forced by atmospheric century reanalysis data, e.g. 20th Century Reanalysis Project (20CR) ensembles, ERA5 and UERRA–HARMONIE. The eight selected historical storms lead either to the highest storm tide extremes for at least one of three locations around the German Bight or to extreme storm surge events during low tide. In general, extreme storm tides could be reproduced, and some individual ensemble members are suitable for the reconstruction of respective storm tides. However, the highest observed water level in the German Bight could not be simulated with any considered forcing. The particular weather situations with corresponding storm tracks are analysed to better understand their different impact on the peak storm tides, their variability and their predictability. Storms with more northerly tracks generally show less variability in wind speed and a better agreement with the observed extreme water levels for the German Bight. The impact of two severe historical storms that peaked at low tide is investigated with shifted tides. For Husum in the eastern German Bight this results in a substantial increase in the peak water levels reaching a historical maximum.\n","PeriodicalId":508073,"journal":{"name":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","volume":"9 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-24-481-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Century reanalysis models offer a possibility to investigate extreme events and gain further insights into their impact through numerical experiments. This paper is a comprehensive summary of historical hazardous storm tides in the German Bight (southern North Sea) with the aim of comparing and evaluating the potential of different century reanalysis data to be used for the reconstruction of extreme water levels. The composite analysis of historical water level extremes, underlying atmospheric situations and their uncertainties may further support decision-making on coastal protection and risk assessment. The analysis is done based on the results of the regional hydrodynamic model simulations forced by atmospheric century reanalysis data, e.g. 20th Century Reanalysis Project (20CR) ensembles, ERA5 and UERRA–HARMONIE. The eight selected historical storms lead either to the highest storm tide extremes for at least one of three locations around the German Bight or to extreme storm surge events during low tide. In general, extreme storm tides could be reproduced, and some individual ensemble members are suitable for the reconstruction of respective storm tides. However, the highest observed water level in the German Bight could not be simulated with any considered forcing. The particular weather situations with corresponding storm tracks are analysed to better understand their different impact on the peak storm tides, their variability and their predictability. Storms with more northerly tracks generally show less variability in wind speed and a better agreement with the observed extreme water levels for the German Bight. The impact of two severe historical storms that peaked at low tide is investigated with shifted tides. For Husum in the eastern German Bight this results in a substantial increase in the peak water levels reaching a historical maximum.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用世纪再分析数据调查德国海湾历史上的强风暴和风暴潮
摘要世纪再分析模型为研究极端事件并通过数值实验进一步了解其影响提供了可能。本文全面总结了德国湾(北海南部)历史上的危险风暴潮,旨在比较和评估不同世纪再分析数据用于重建极端水位的潜力。对历史极端水位、基本大气状况及其不确定性进行综合分析,可以进一步支持海岸保护和风险评估的决策。分析是根据大气世纪再分析数据(如 20 世纪再分析项目(20CR)集合、ERA5 和 UERRA-HARMONIE)强迫的区域水动力模式模拟结果进行的。所选的八次历史风暴潮要么导致德国湾周围三个地点中至少一个地点出现最高风暴潮极端值,要么导致低潮期间出现极端风暴潮事件。总的来说,极端风暴潮是可以再现的,而且有些组合成员也适合重建各自的风暴潮。然而,德国港湾的最高观测水位无法用任何考虑的强迫来模拟。分析了带有相应风暴轨迹的特殊天气情况,以更好地了解它们对风暴潮峰值的不同影响、其可变性和可预测性。风向更偏北的风暴通常风速变化较小,与观测到的德国湾极端水位更吻合。我们利用移位潮汐研究了历史上两次在低潮时达到峰值的严重风暴的影响。这导致德国港湾东部胡苏姆的最高水位大幅上升,达到历史最高值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Flood occurrence and impact models for socioeconomic applications over Canada and the United States Harmonizing seismicity information in Central Asian countries: earthquake catalogue and active faults Model-based assessment of climate change impact on inland flood risk at the German North Sea coast caused by compounding storm tide and precipitation events Modelling crop hail damage footprints with single-polarization radar: the roles of spatial resolution, hail intensity, and cropland density A glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment for the Phochhu river basin, Bhutan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1