“Keep Your Heads Held High Boys!”: Examining the Relationship between the Proud Boys’ Online Discourse and Offline Activities

C. Bailard, Rebekah Tromble, Wei Zhong, Federico Bianchi, Pedram Hosseini, David Broniatowski
{"title":"“Keep Your Heads Held High Boys!”: Examining the Relationship between the Proud Boys’ Online Discourse and Offline Activities","authors":"C. Bailard, Rebekah Tromble, Wei Zhong, Federico Bianchi, Pedram Hosseini, David Broniatowski","doi":"10.1017/s0003055423001478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the relationship between online communication by the Proud Boys and their offline activities. We use a supervised machine learning model to analyze a novel dataset of Proud Boys Telegram messages, merged with US Crisis Monitor data of violent and nonviolent events in which group members participated over a 31-month period. Our analysis finds that intensifying expressions of grievances online predict participation in offline violence, whereas motivational appeals to group pride, morale, or solidarity share a reciprocal relationship with participation in offline events. This suggests a potential online messaging–offline action cycle, in which (a) nonviolent offline protests predict an increasing proportion of motivational messaging and (b) increases in the frequency and proportion of motivational appeals online, in turn, predict subsequent violent offline activities. Our findings offer useful theoretical insights for understanding the relationship between online speech and offline behavior.","PeriodicalId":505279,"journal":{"name":"American Political Science Review","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055423001478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between online communication by the Proud Boys and their offline activities. We use a supervised machine learning model to analyze a novel dataset of Proud Boys Telegram messages, merged with US Crisis Monitor data of violent and nonviolent events in which group members participated over a 31-month period. Our analysis finds that intensifying expressions of grievances online predict participation in offline violence, whereas motivational appeals to group pride, morale, or solidarity share a reciprocal relationship with participation in offline events. This suggests a potential online messaging–offline action cycle, in which (a) nonviolent offline protests predict an increasing proportion of motivational messaging and (b) increases in the frequency and proportion of motivational appeals online, in turn, predict subsequent violent offline activities. Our findings offer useful theoretical insights for understanding the relationship between online speech and offline behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"昂首挺胸,孩子们!":考察骄傲男孩的网上言论与网下活动之间的关系
本研究探讨了 "骄傲男孩 "的在线交流与其线下活动之间的关系。我们使用一个有监督的机器学习模型来分析骄傲男孩 Telegram 消息的新数据集,该数据集与美国危机监测组织在 31 个月内成员参与的暴力和非暴力事件的数据合并在一起。我们的分析发现,在网上表达不满情绪可预测参与线下暴力事件的情况,而呼吁群体自豪感、士气或团结的动机则与参与线下事件有着互为因果的关系。这表明存在一个潜在的线上信息-线下行动循环:(a) 非暴力的线下抗议活动预示着激励性信息所占比例的增加;(b) 线上激励性呼吁的频率和比例的增加反过来又预示着随后的线下暴力活动。我们的研究结果为理解在线言论与线下行为之间的关系提供了有益的理论启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Campaign Finance Vouchers Do Not Expand the Diversity of Donors: Evidence from Seattle Wages for Earthwork An Empire of Development: American Political Thought in Transnational Perspective An Insurgent Mood: Lorraine Hansberry on the Politics of Home The Distributive Politics of Grants-in-Aid
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1