Understanding populist far-right anti-immigration and anti-gender stances beyond the paradigm of gender as ‘a symbolic glue’: Giorgia Meloni’s modern motherhood, neo-Catholicism, and reproductive racism

Maria Elena Indelicato, Maíra Magalhães Lopes
{"title":"Understanding populist far-right anti-immigration and anti-gender stances beyond the paradigm of gender as ‘a symbolic glue’: Giorgia Meloni’s modern motherhood, neo-Catholicism, and reproductive racism","authors":"Maria Elena Indelicato, Maíra Magalhães Lopes","doi":"10.1177/13505068241230819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on theoretical framings in critical race and queer studies, this article focuses on the first female prime minister of Italy, Giorgia Meloni, as an entry point to examining the current alignment between far-right populism, anti-gender movements, and White supremacist conspiracy theories in Europe. First, considering the contradictions that female leaders of far-right populist parties seem to negotiate, this article compares Meloni’s communication strategies and political interventions to those of her counterparts in Europe. Second, employing the concept of ‘productive racism’, the article examines Meloni’s birth rate agenda and related ambivalent stance towards ‘migrant’ women. In so doing, this article first demonstrates how existing theoretical frames, developed to examine current entanglements between feminist, anti-gender, and anti-immigration discourses, fall short of explaining why ‘gender’ can be used to ‘stick’ ‘migrant’ and queer subjects together, characterising both as threats to the sexual order of Europe. Even when ‘migrant’ women are depicted as hopeless victims, populist far-right leaders appraise them as either aberrant or otherwise deficient mothers. The article concludes by urging scholars of far-right populism, migration, and religion and their intersections with gender, to adopt race as a primary category of analysis and, therefore, consider that it is race that makes gender ‘stick’ as the common enemy of disparate political actors.","PeriodicalId":312959,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Women's Studies","volume":"120 49","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Women's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068241230819","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Building on theoretical framings in critical race and queer studies, this article focuses on the first female prime minister of Italy, Giorgia Meloni, as an entry point to examining the current alignment between far-right populism, anti-gender movements, and White supremacist conspiracy theories in Europe. First, considering the contradictions that female leaders of far-right populist parties seem to negotiate, this article compares Meloni’s communication strategies and political interventions to those of her counterparts in Europe. Second, employing the concept of ‘productive racism’, the article examines Meloni’s birth rate agenda and related ambivalent stance towards ‘migrant’ women. In so doing, this article first demonstrates how existing theoretical frames, developed to examine current entanglements between feminist, anti-gender, and anti-immigration discourses, fall short of explaining why ‘gender’ can be used to ‘stick’ ‘migrant’ and queer subjects together, characterising both as threats to the sexual order of Europe. Even when ‘migrant’ women are depicted as hopeless victims, populist far-right leaders appraise them as either aberrant or otherwise deficient mothers. The article concludes by urging scholars of far-right populism, migration, and religion and their intersections with gender, to adopt race as a primary category of analysis and, therefore, consider that it is race that makes gender ‘stick’ as the common enemy of disparate political actors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超越将性别视为 "象征性粘合剂 "的范式,理解民粹主义极右翼反移民和反性别立场:乔治亚-梅洛尼的现代母性、新天主教和生殖种族主义
本文以批判性种族和同性恋研究的理论框架为基础,以意大利第一位女总理乔治娅-梅洛尼为切入点,探讨当前欧洲极右民粹主义、反性别运动和白人至上阴谋论之间的一致性。首先,考虑到极右民粹主义政党的女性领导人似乎需要处理的矛盾,本文将梅洛尼的传播策略和政治干预措施与她在欧洲的同行进行了比较。其次,文章运用 "生产性种族主义 "的概念,研究了梅洛尼的出生率议程以及与此相关的对 "移民 "妇女的矛盾立场。在此过程中,本文首先展示了现有的理论框架是如何发展的,这些框架旨在研究当前女权主义、反性别和反移民论述之间的纠葛,但却无法解释为什么 "性别 "可以被用来将 "移民 "和同性恋主体 "捆绑 "在一起,并将二者定性为对欧洲性秩序的威胁。即使 "移民 "妇女被描绘成毫无希望的受害者,民粹主义极右翼领导人也会将她们评价为反常或有缺陷的母亲。文章最后敦促研究极右民粹主义、移民、宗教及其与性别的交集的学者将种族作为主要分析类别,并因此考虑到正是种族使性别 "成为 "不同政治行为者的共同敌人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Touching through distance: Cyborg affective touch during Covid-19 pandemic Pandemic narra(c)tions. Collective audiovisual configurations and participatory self-care Domestic closed circuits (of violence) Unveiling urban landscapes: Alisa Oleva’s performances during the pandemic Young women, dating apps, and affective assemblages in the time of pandemic: No relationship is a linear transition to a fixed point
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1