Trends of Diagnostic and Surgery of Intraocular Foreign Body: a 20 Years Review

Nadya Eunice Sumolang, Venny D. Yolanda, Muhammad Ihsan
{"title":"Trends of Diagnostic and Surgery of Intraocular Foreign Body: a 20 Years Review","authors":"Nadya Eunice Sumolang, Venny D. Yolanda, Muhammad Ihsan","doi":"10.35749/qnv95542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIntroduction & Objectives : Intraocular foreign bodies remain a common cause of ocular emergencies worldwide. Early and proper diagnostics and management are needed to reduce morbidity. In this paper, we reviewed the diagnostic and surgery trends of IOFB in the last 20 years. We aim to serve the update and better understand how to manage cases of IOFBs properly. \nMethods : We conducted a literature review on Scopus from 2002 to 2022 using the PRISMA method (assisted by the Watase UAKE application). We include imaging and surgery data in cases of metallic and non- metallic IOFB in the anterior, intralenticular, and posterior segments. \nResults : Thirty-one studies were included from Scopus and reference digging. We then classified the study into two main topics, surgery and diagnostic. In the last 20 years, imaging in diagnosis has been beneficial. CT-scan and MRI are still the leading options in visualizing metallic and non-metallic IOFB, respectively. However, in the case of tiny IOFB, MRI might be performed to visualize the metallic component with special considerations. IOCT also be considered to ensure no IOFB is left behind after removal. As for surgery, combining IOFB removal with pars plana vitrectomy remains the primary choice for IOFB in the posterior segment, combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation for the intralenticular and magnetic for the anterior segment. Combining two or more surgical techniques improves outcomes and prevents postoperative complications. \nConclusion : A proper understanding of the components, location, and size of IOFB is required to determine the use of practical examinations and management of IOFB cases.","PeriodicalId":165753,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35749/qnv95542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction & Objectives : Intraocular foreign bodies remain a common cause of ocular emergencies worldwide. Early and proper diagnostics and management are needed to reduce morbidity. In this paper, we reviewed the diagnostic and surgery trends of IOFB in the last 20 years. We aim to serve the update and better understand how to manage cases of IOFBs properly. Methods : We conducted a literature review on Scopus from 2002 to 2022 using the PRISMA method (assisted by the Watase UAKE application). We include imaging and surgery data in cases of metallic and non- metallic IOFB in the anterior, intralenticular, and posterior segments. Results : Thirty-one studies were included from Scopus and reference digging. We then classified the study into two main topics, surgery and diagnostic. In the last 20 years, imaging in diagnosis has been beneficial. CT-scan and MRI are still the leading options in visualizing metallic and non-metallic IOFB, respectively. However, in the case of tiny IOFB, MRI might be performed to visualize the metallic component with special considerations. IOCT also be considered to ensure no IOFB is left behind after removal. As for surgery, combining IOFB removal with pars plana vitrectomy remains the primary choice for IOFB in the posterior segment, combined with phacoemulsification and IOL implantation for the intralenticular and magnetic for the anterior segment. Combining two or more surgical techniques improves outcomes and prevents postoperative complications. Conclusion : A proper understanding of the components, location, and size of IOFB is required to determine the use of practical examinations and management of IOFB cases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼内异物的诊断和手术趋势:20 年回顾
摘要 简介和目的:眼内异物仍然是全球眼科急症的常见原因。要降低发病率,就必须及早进行适当的诊断和处理。本文回顾了过去 20 年来眼内异物的诊断和手术趋势。我们的目的是提供最新信息,更好地了解如何正确处理 IOFB 病例。方法:我们采用 PRISMA 方法(在 Watase UAKE 应用程序的辅助下)在 Scopus 上对 2002 年至 2022 年的文献进行了回顾。我们纳入了前段、关节内和后段金属和非金属 IOFB 病例的成像和手术数据。结果:从 Scopus 和参考文献中纳入了 31 项研究。然后,我们将研究分为手术和诊断两大主题。在过去的 20 年中,影像学在诊断中发挥了重要作用。CT 扫描和核磁共振成像仍分别是观察金属和非金属 IOFB 的主要方法。不过,对于微小的 IOFB,核磁共振成像可用于观察金属成分,但要特别注意。还可以考虑 IOCT,以确保切除后没有 IOFB 残留。在手术方面,IOFB摘除术与玻璃体旁切除术相结合仍是治疗后段IOFB的主要选择,结合超声乳化术和人工晶体植入术治疗节内IOFB,以及磁性IOFB治疗前段IOFB。结合两种或多种手术技术可提高疗效并预防术后并发症。结论:需要正确理解 IOFB 的成分、位置和大小,以确定 IOFB 病例的实际检查和管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN ESOTROPIA AT CIPTO MANGUNKUSUMO HOSPITAL: A 4-YEAR OBSERVATION ON CHARACTERISTIC AND RESULT VISUAL OUTCOME OF TRAUMATIC OPTIC NEUROPATHYAFTER STEROID TREATMENT IN KARIADI HOSPITAL UNVEILING OPHTHALMOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN CORNELIA DE LANGE SYNDROME: A RARE CASE REPORT NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS AMONG 195 PATIENTS WITH INTRACRANIAL TUMOR AT NATIONAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL  AN ATYPICAL CASE OF BILATERAL CORNEAL OPACITY: WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE DIAGNOSIS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1