The Relationship between Characteristics and Underlying Eye Disorders with Optical Aid Selection and Visual Acuity Status Differences in Children with Low Vision Before and After Optical Aid Selection

Andityo Sidohutomo, Ria Sandy Deneska, R. Loebis
{"title":"The Relationship between Characteristics and Underlying Eye Disorders with Optical Aid Selection and Visual Acuity Status Differences in Children with Low Vision Before and After Optical Aid Selection","authors":"Andityo Sidohutomo, Ria Sandy Deneska, R. Loebis","doi":"10.35749/6mad5m93","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Low vision is a vision disorder that can have a significant impact on a person's independence, especially in children. According to WHO data from 2019, 246 million people suffer from low vision. Ophthalmologists must prioritize low-vision services such as refractive correction and low-vision assessment. This study aims to learn more about the relationship between characteristics and underlying eye disorders with optical aid selection, as well as differences in visual acuity status in children with low vision before and after optical aid selection. \nMethods: This study was an analytic observational retrospective cohort using medical records of children with low vision in RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya. This study analyzed the relationship between characteristics (gender, age, education level, intervention history) and underlying eye disorders with optical aid selection using the Chi-Square test, while visual acuity status differences before and after optical aid selection were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. \nResults: There were no relationships between characteristics (gender, age, education level, intervention history) and underlying eye disorders with optical aid selection (p > 0.05). There were differences in visual acuity status before and after optical aid selection (p < 0.05) with a minimum decrease of 0.1 logMAR which means an increase in visual acuity in all 72 samples of children with low vision after optical aid selection. \nConclusion: These data provide new evidence of essential links between visual acuity status before and after optical aid selection. However, characteristics (gender, age, education level, intervention history) and underlying eye disorders were not associated with optical aid selection.","PeriodicalId":165753,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","volume":"34 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35749/6mad5m93","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low vision is a vision disorder that can have a significant impact on a person's independence, especially in children. According to WHO data from 2019, 246 million people suffer from low vision. Ophthalmologists must prioritize low-vision services such as refractive correction and low-vision assessment. This study aims to learn more about the relationship between characteristics and underlying eye disorders with optical aid selection, as well as differences in visual acuity status in children with low vision before and after optical aid selection. Methods: This study was an analytic observational retrospective cohort using medical records of children with low vision in RSUD Dr. Soetomo Surabaya. This study analyzed the relationship between characteristics (gender, age, education level, intervention history) and underlying eye disorders with optical aid selection using the Chi-Square test, while visual acuity status differences before and after optical aid selection were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test. Results: There were no relationships between characteristics (gender, age, education level, intervention history) and underlying eye disorders with optical aid selection (p > 0.05). There were differences in visual acuity status before and after optical aid selection (p < 0.05) with a minimum decrease of 0.1 logMAR which means an increase in visual acuity in all 72 samples of children with low vision after optical aid selection. Conclusion: These data provide new evidence of essential links between visual acuity status before and after optical aid selection. However, characteristics (gender, age, education level, intervention history) and underlying eye disorders were not associated with optical aid selection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
选择助视器前后低视力儿童的特征和潜在眼疾与助视器选择和视力状况差异之间的关系
背景:低视力是一种视力障碍,会严重影响一个人的独立性,尤其是儿童。根据世卫组织 2019 年的数据,有 2.46 亿人患有低视力。眼科医生必须优先考虑低视力服务,如屈光矫正和低视力评估。本研究旨在进一步了解低视力儿童的特征和潜在眼疾与助视器选择之间的关系,以及助视器选择前后视力状况的差异。研究方法本研究是一项分析观察性回顾性队列研究,使用的是泗水苏托莫博士视力保健中心低视力儿童的医疗记录。本研究使用 Chi-Square 检验分析了特征(性别、年龄、教育水平、干预史)和潜在眼疾与助视器选择之间的关系,并使用 Wilcoxon 检验分析了助视器选择前后视力状况的差异。结果显示特征(性别、年龄、教育程度、干预史)和基础眼病与助视器选择之间没有关系(P > 0.05)。选择助视器前后的视力状况存在差异(p < 0.05),最低下降了 0.1 logMAR,这意味着所有 72 个低视力儿童样本的视力在选择助视器后都有所提高。结论这些数据为选择助视器前后视力状况之间的重要联系提供了新的证据。然而,特征(性别、年龄、教育水平、干预史)和潜在眼疾与助视器选择无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN ESOTROPIA AT CIPTO MANGUNKUSUMO HOSPITAL: A 4-YEAR OBSERVATION ON CHARACTERISTIC AND RESULT VISUAL OUTCOME OF TRAUMATIC OPTIC NEUROPATHYAFTER STEROID TREATMENT IN KARIADI HOSPITAL UNVEILING OPHTHALMOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN CORNELIA DE LANGE SYNDROME: A RARE CASE REPORT NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS AMONG 195 PATIENTS WITH INTRACRANIAL TUMOR AT NATIONAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL  AN ATYPICAL CASE OF BILATERAL CORNEAL OPACITY: WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE DIAGNOSIS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1