{"title":"The structural and electronic split: Boron vs aluminum hydrides","authors":"A. Pozdeev, I. A. Popov","doi":"10.1063/5.0189211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We systematically investigated the structural evolution of boron (B) and aluminum (Al) hydrides using various DFT and ab initio methods, aiming to reveal the similarities and differences in their geometric and electronic structures. While B hydrides have been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically, less is known about its group 13 heavier congener, Al. Extensive global minimum searches of the B2Hx (Al2Hx) and B3Hy (Al3Hy) hydrides (x = [0–6], y = [0–9]) were performed to identify the most stable geometric structures for each stoichiometry. In most of the series, B and Al hydrides exhibit qualitatively different structures, except for the most saturated X2H5 and X2H6 stoichiometries. Chemical bonding analyses employing adaptive natural density partitioning and electron localization function methods identified notable differences between B and Al hydrides in most of the compositions. B hydrides predominantly possess two-center (2c) and three-center (3c) bonding elements, suggesting a relatively balanced electron distribution. On the contrary, Al hydrides tend to retain unpaired electrons or lone pairs on Al atoms, forming a large number of closely lying isomers with various combinations of 1c, 2c, 3c, and 4c bonding elements. Thermodynamic stability analyses revealed that all studied clusters demonstrated stability toward various H/H2 dissociation pathways, with Al hydrides being less stable than B counterparts.","PeriodicalId":72559,"journal":{"name":"Chemical physics reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical physics reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0189211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We systematically investigated the structural evolution of boron (B) and aluminum (Al) hydrides using various DFT and ab initio methods, aiming to reveal the similarities and differences in their geometric and electronic structures. While B hydrides have been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically, less is known about its group 13 heavier congener, Al. Extensive global minimum searches of the B2Hx (Al2Hx) and B3Hy (Al3Hy) hydrides (x = [0–6], y = [0–9]) were performed to identify the most stable geometric structures for each stoichiometry. In most of the series, B and Al hydrides exhibit qualitatively different structures, except for the most saturated X2H5 and X2H6 stoichiometries. Chemical bonding analyses employing adaptive natural density partitioning and electron localization function methods identified notable differences between B and Al hydrides in most of the compositions. B hydrides predominantly possess two-center (2c) and three-center (3c) bonding elements, suggesting a relatively balanced electron distribution. On the contrary, Al hydrides tend to retain unpaired electrons or lone pairs on Al atoms, forming a large number of closely lying isomers with various combinations of 1c, 2c, 3c, and 4c bonding elements. Thermodynamic stability analyses revealed that all studied clusters demonstrated stability toward various H/H2 dissociation pathways, with Al hydrides being less stable than B counterparts.