Perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning: a survey of Chinese university students

IF 2.1 2区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Applied Linguistics Review Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1515/applirev-2023-0136
Zhengdong Gan, Xianrong Wang
{"title":"Perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning: a survey of Chinese university students","authors":"Zhengdong Gan, Xianrong Wang","doi":"10.1515/applirev-2023-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drawing on recent theorizing of feedback in educational assessment and psychology, the current study aimed to examine the links between perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning. Seven hundred and sixty-four Chinese university students attending a tertiary-level English enhancement course (N = 764; age: M = 19.45, SD = 0.88; 57.3 % female) participated in this study. The students completed surveys measuring their perceived teacher feedback practices, feedback motivation and engagement. Scaffolding feedback, verification feedback, and criticism were found to significantly predict student feedback motivation. Feedback enjoyment significantly predicted student feedback engagement, but there was no positive significant relationship between perceived feedback usefulness and feedback engagement. Indirect effects testing provided empirical evidence that student feedback motivation mediated the impact of teacher feedback on student feedback engagement in a university English enhancement course context.","PeriodicalId":46472,"journal":{"name":"Applied Linguistics Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Linguistics Review","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2023-0136","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on recent theorizing of feedback in educational assessment and psychology, the current study aimed to examine the links between perceived teacher feedback practices, student feedback motivation and engagement in English learning. Seven hundred and sixty-four Chinese university students attending a tertiary-level English enhancement course (N = 764; age: M = 19.45, SD = 0.88; 57.3 % female) participated in this study. The students completed surveys measuring their perceived teacher feedback practices, feedback motivation and engagement. Scaffolding feedback, verification feedback, and criticism were found to significantly predict student feedback motivation. Feedback enjoyment significantly predicted student feedback engagement, but there was no positive significant relationship between perceived feedback usefulness and feedback engagement. Indirect effects testing provided empirical evidence that student feedback motivation mediated the impact of teacher feedback on student feedback engagement in a university English enhancement course context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国大学生对教师反馈做法、学生反馈动机和英语学习参与度的看法调查
本研究借鉴了教育评估和心理学中有关反馈的最新理论,旨在探讨教师反馈实践感知、学生反馈动机和英语学习参与度之间的联系。764 名中国大学生参加了本研究,他们都是高等院校英语提高班的学生(人数 = 764;年龄:M = 19.45,SD = 0.88;女生占 57.3%)。学生们填写了调查问卷,以了解他们对教师反馈做法、反馈动机和参与度的看法。研究发现,脚手架反馈、验证反馈和批评能显著预测学生的反馈动机。反馈乐趣能明显预测学生的反馈参与度,但在感知反馈有用性和反馈参与度之间没有积极的显著关系。间接效应检验提供了实证证据,证明在大学英语提高课程中,学生反馈动机对教师反馈对学生反馈参与度的影响具有中介作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
期刊最新文献
The role of speaker categorization in South Korean attitudes toward North Korean accents “As a Muslim…”: on the importance of intercultural responsibility in transnational cultural exchanges Culture machines When AI meets intercultural communication: new frontiers, new agendas Artificial intelligence and depth ontology: implications for intercultural ethics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1