Results validation by using finite volume method for the blood flow with magnetohydrodynamics and hybrid nanofluids

J. A. Haider, Shahbaz Ahmad, H. A. Ghazwani, Mohamed Hussien, M. Almusawa, Emad A. Az-Zo’bi
{"title":"Results validation by using finite volume method for the blood flow with magnetohydrodynamics and hybrid nanofluids","authors":"J. A. Haider, Shahbaz Ahmad, H. A. Ghazwani, Mohamed Hussien, M. Almusawa, Emad A. Az-Zo’bi","doi":"10.1142/s0217984924502087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper conducts an extensive comparative analysis of numerical methods employed in modeling blood flow through arteries with Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and hybrid nanofluids. The study investigates the effectiveness and precision of distinct numerical approaches: Akbari Ganji’s Method (AGM), Fourth-Order Runge–Kutta (RK4), Finite Volume Method (FVM), and the Finite Element Method (FEM). These methods are essential for comprehending the intricate fluid dynamics that arise in the presence of magnetic fields and hybrid nanofluids a phenomenon relevant in numerous medical applications. Blood flow is subjected to a homogeneous magnetic field in a radial direction while the magneto-hemodynamics effect is taken into account. A variety of medical, physiological, and surgical procedures, as well as the regulation of blood pressure, heat distribution, wound healing, diagnostic imaging, and drug discovery, depend on blood flow through arteries to carry out vital functions such as oxygen and nutrition delivery, organ maintenance, and wound healing. Our findings highlight that while each method has strengths, their applicability varies based on the problem’s characteristics and computational resource constraints. This analysis aids researchers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable method for their modeling requirements, advancing numerical techniques for complex fluid dynamics involving MHD and hybrid nanofluids.","PeriodicalId":503716,"journal":{"name":"Modern Physics Letters B","volume":" 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Physics Letters B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s0217984924502087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper conducts an extensive comparative analysis of numerical methods employed in modeling blood flow through arteries with Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) and hybrid nanofluids. The study investigates the effectiveness and precision of distinct numerical approaches: Akbari Ganji’s Method (AGM), Fourth-Order Runge–Kutta (RK4), Finite Volume Method (FVM), and the Finite Element Method (FEM). These methods are essential for comprehending the intricate fluid dynamics that arise in the presence of magnetic fields and hybrid nanofluids a phenomenon relevant in numerous medical applications. Blood flow is subjected to a homogeneous magnetic field in a radial direction while the magneto-hemodynamics effect is taken into account. A variety of medical, physiological, and surgical procedures, as well as the regulation of blood pressure, heat distribution, wound healing, diagnostic imaging, and drug discovery, depend on blood flow through arteries to carry out vital functions such as oxygen and nutrition delivery, organ maintenance, and wound healing. Our findings highlight that while each method has strengths, their applicability varies based on the problem’s characteristics and computational resource constraints. This analysis aids researchers and practitioners in selecting the most suitable method for their modeling requirements, advancing numerical techniques for complex fluid dynamics involving MHD and hybrid nanofluids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用有限体积法对磁流体动力学和混合纳米流体的血流进行结果验证
本文对利用磁流体动力学(MHD)和混合纳米流体对流经动脉的血流进行建模时所采用的数值方法进行了广泛的比较分析。研究调查了不同数值方法的有效性和精确性:Akbari Ganji 方法 (AGM)、四阶 Runge-Kutta (RK4)、有限体积法 (FVM) 和有限元方法 (FEM)。这些方法对于理解磁场和混合纳米流体存在时产生的错综复杂的流体动力学是必不可少的。血流在径向方向上受到均匀磁场的作用,同时考虑到磁流体动力学效应。各种医疗、生理和外科手术,以及血压调节、热分布、伤口愈合、诊断成像和药物研发,都依赖于动脉血流来实现氧气和营养输送、器官维护和伤口愈合等重要功能。我们的研究结果突出表明,虽然每种方法都有其优势,但根据问题的特点和计算资源的限制,它们的适用性各不相同。这项分析有助于研究人员和从业人员根据建模要求选择最合适的方法,推动涉及 MHD 和混合纳米流体的复杂流体动力学数值技术的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Joule heating effects on triple diffusive free convective MHD flow over a convective surface: A Lie-group transformation analysis Preparation, structure and spectral characteristics of Zinc tellurite glasses system doped with different concentrations of Tm3+ Impacts of activation energy and electroosmosis on peristaltic motion of micropolar Newtonian nanofluid inside a microchannel Viscous dissipation and Joule heating in case of variable electrical conductivity Carreau–Yasuda nanofluid flow in a complex wavy asymmetric channel through porous media Stability analysis and retrieval of new solitary waves of (2+1)- and (3+1)-dimensional potential Kadomtsev–Petviashvili and B-type Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equations using auxiliary equation technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1