“I am your companion on earth, fight for me!”: Mutuality in Ancient Egyptian Letters to the Dead in the End of 3rd – the Beginning of 2nd Millennium BC

A. E. Demidchik, A. V. Khaprova
{"title":"“I am your companion on earth, fight for me!”: Mutuality in Ancient Egyptian Letters to the Dead in the End of 3rd – the Beginning of 2nd Millennium BC","authors":"A. E. Demidchik, A. V. Khaprova","doi":"10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-1-9-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although the ideological foundation of mutual aid within ancient Egyptian small social groups (family, neighbors, etc.) is mostly clear, very few written sources reveal such customs and practices of the Old and Middle Kingdoms. This gap is to some extent filled by Letters to the Dead – written requests for help addressed to deceased relatives, often mentioning mutual obligations of the living “sender” and the deceased “recipient”. Most “senders” of such letters require the “addressees” to follow the principle of reciprocity, a kind of do ut des: since the living contribute to the well-being of the dead by performing cult actions, the latter must now help the living. The rule of mutual assistance was so strict and pervasive that it transcended the boundary of life and death. The Letters to the Dead imply that deceased relatives remained firmly embedded in social networks of mutual aid. However, the most valued was not  a strictly fixed “return” of the once received assistance, but the confidence that the person who received support will not fail to come to the aid of his “benefactor” if trouble happens to the latter. At the same time, the Letters to the Dead show that Egyptians considered it not too petty to refer to their former merits in desperate times: for example, to mention an offering of a bull leg and seven quails in a letter to the deceased parents.","PeriodicalId":508489,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology","volume":"21 1‐2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik NSU. Series: History and Philology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25205/1818-7919-2024-23-1-9-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the ideological foundation of mutual aid within ancient Egyptian small social groups (family, neighbors, etc.) is mostly clear, very few written sources reveal such customs and practices of the Old and Middle Kingdoms. This gap is to some extent filled by Letters to the Dead – written requests for help addressed to deceased relatives, often mentioning mutual obligations of the living “sender” and the deceased “recipient”. Most “senders” of such letters require the “addressees” to follow the principle of reciprocity, a kind of do ut des: since the living contribute to the well-being of the dead by performing cult actions, the latter must now help the living. The rule of mutual assistance was so strict and pervasive that it transcended the boundary of life and death. The Letters to the Dead imply that deceased relatives remained firmly embedded in social networks of mutual aid. However, the most valued was not  a strictly fixed “return” of the once received assistance, but the confidence that the person who received support will not fail to come to the aid of his “benefactor” if trouble happens to the latter. At the same time, the Letters to the Dead show that Egyptians considered it not too petty to refer to their former merits in desperate times: for example, to mention an offering of a bull leg and seven quails in a letter to the deceased parents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"我是你在人间的伴侣,为我而战!":公元前三世纪末至二千年初古埃及写给死者的信中的相互性
虽然古埃及小社会群体(家庭、邻居等)内部互助的思想基础非常清晰,但很少有文字资料能揭示古埃及旧王国和中王国的这种习俗和做法。给死者的信在一定程度上填补了这一空白,这些信是写给已故亲属的书面求助信,通常会提及活着的 "发信人 "和已故的 "收信人 "之间的相互义务。大多数此类信件的 "发信人 "都要求 "收信人 "遵循互惠原则,即一种 "do ut des":既然活着的人通过崇拜行为为逝者的福祉做出了贡献,那么逝者现在就必须帮助活着的人。互助规则是如此严格和普遍,以至于超越了生与死的界限。给死者的信》表明,已故的亲属仍然牢牢地扎根于社会互助网络之中。然而,最值得珍视的并不是曾经接受过援助的严格固定的 "回报",而是接受援助的人在 "恩人 "遇到困难时不会不伸出援手的信心。同时,《给死者的信》显示,埃及人认为在绝望的时候提及自己曾经的功绩并不是一件太小气的事情:例如,在给已故父母的信中提到了一条牛腿和七只鹌鹑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Zero Period Rule or the Sing Communicative Potential in Digital Punctuation Chronotopic Dominants in the Discourse of the Literary Almanac “Siberian Athens” at the Turn of the 20th−21st Centuries “Literature is an Industrial World”. Book Review: Vdovin A. V., Zubkov K. Yu. (comp. and resp. eds.). Institutes of Literature in the Russian Empire. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Press, 2023, 496 p. Television Media System of the Tomsk Region in 1990–2020: Unknown Pages of the History of Tomsk Journalism Transformation of Speech Etiquette in Socio-Political Telegram Channels
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1