Does high-quality news attract engagement on social media? Mediatization, media logic, and the contrasting values that shape news sharing, liking, and commenting on Facebook

Jieun Shin, Seth C. Lewis, Soojong Kim, Kjerstin Thorson
{"title":"Does high-quality news attract engagement on social media? Mediatization, media logic, and the contrasting values that shape news sharing, liking, and commenting on Facebook","authors":"Jieun Shin, Seth C. Lewis, Soojong Kim, Kjerstin Thorson","doi":"10.1177/14614448241228851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the concern over deteriorating news quality on social media, few studies have empirically examined how much high-quality news is rewarded on social media. Guided by the mediatization literature, we compared the extent to which normative values (i.e. factual reporting and public importance) in news stories as opposed to social media values (i.e. popularity) contribute to actual engagement such as sharing, liking, and commenting on Facebook. The normative values and social media values were drawn from survey participants’ evaluations of the news content, recruiting both consumers ( n = 5816) and journalists ( n = 742). Each news post’s engagement metrics were extracted from Facebook. Our analysis shows that consumers’ news judgments are overall consistent with those of journalists. More importantly, the study finds that a social media value dominates news engagement whereas normative values are eminently weak. We discuss the implications of the disproportionally powerful social media logic shaping news engagement in comparison to normative logics for news.","PeriodicalId":508039,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"23 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241228851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the concern over deteriorating news quality on social media, few studies have empirically examined how much high-quality news is rewarded on social media. Guided by the mediatization literature, we compared the extent to which normative values (i.e. factual reporting and public importance) in news stories as opposed to social media values (i.e. popularity) contribute to actual engagement such as sharing, liking, and commenting on Facebook. The normative values and social media values were drawn from survey participants’ evaluations of the news content, recruiting both consumers ( n = 5816) and journalists ( n = 742). Each news post’s engagement metrics were extracted from Facebook. Our analysis shows that consumers’ news judgments are overall consistent with those of journalists. More importantly, the study finds that a social media value dominates news engagement whereas normative values are eminently weak. We discuss the implications of the disproportionally powerful social media logic shaping news engagement in comparison to normative logics for news.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高质量新闻是否能吸引社交媒体上的参与?媒体化、媒体逻辑以及形成 Facebook 上新闻分享、点赞和评论的对立价值观
尽管人们对社交媒体上新闻质量的下降表示担忧,但很少有研究对社交媒体上高质量新闻的回报率进行实证研究。在媒介化文献的指导下,我们比较了新闻报道中的规范价值(即事实报道和公众重要性)与社交媒体价值(即受欢迎程度)在多大程度上促进了实际参与,如在 Facebook 上的分享、点赞和评论。规范价值和社交媒体价值来自调查参与者对新闻内容的评价,调查参与者包括消费者(n = 5816)和记者(n = 742)。每个新闻帖子的参与度指标都是从 Facebook 中提取的。我们的分析表明,消费者对新闻的判断总体上与记者一致。更重要的是,研究发现社交媒体价值主导了新闻参与,而规范价值则明显较弱。我们讨论了与新闻规范逻辑相比,社交媒体逻辑对新闻参与度的影响不成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How to grow a transnational field: A network analysis of the global fact-checking movement How to grow a transnational field: A network analysis of the global fact-checking movement Flagging as a silencing tool: Exploring the relationship between de-platforming of sex and online abuse on Instagram and TikTok Flagging as a silencing tool: Exploring the relationship between de-platforming of sex and online abuse on Instagram and TikTok The politics of tech responsibility: Understanding companies’ responsibility as representative claims
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1