Characteristics of Changes in Caregiver Burden during Follow-up at a Memory Clinic: A Retrospective Cohort Study

IF 2.8 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.3233/adr-230069
Hajime Takechi, Hiroshi Yoshino, Megumi Suzuki, Akiko Maeda, S. Suzumura, Eiko Kamiya
{"title":"Characteristics of Changes in Caregiver Burden during Follow-up at a Memory Clinic: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"Hajime Takechi, Hiroshi Yoshino, Megumi Suzuki, Akiko Maeda, S. Suzumura, Eiko Kamiya","doi":"10.3233/adr-230069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Because dementia is a long-term condition, the appropriate involvement of health-care professionals is considered important. However, little is known about the factors associated with changes in family caregiver burden. Objective: To clarify changes in family caregiver burden and associated factors during follow-up at a memory clinic. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 495 pairs of patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and their family caregivers. A total of 120 pairs completed the second evaluation. The caregiver burden was assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Data at the initial visit and after an average follow-up of about 2 years were compared and analyzed. Results: At initial visit, the patients’ mean age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and ZBI scores were 78.6±5.6 years, 23.3±3.5, and 22.6±16.7, respectively. At follow-up, MMSE scores decreased (21.4±4.5, p < 0.001), but ZBI scores remained similar (22.5±13.6). When the difference in ZBI scores between the two time points was defined as ΔZBI, and the related factors were analyzed by multiple regression analysis, ZBI scores at the initial visit, start of psychotropic drug, and decrease of neuropsychiatric symptoms were identified as significant factors (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively). A significant negative correlation was found between ZBI scores at the initial visit and ΔZBI (r = –0.588, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings suggest the importance of assessing changes in the burden experienced by family caregivers during the disease follow-up.","PeriodicalId":73594,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's disease reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/adr-230069","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Because dementia is a long-term condition, the appropriate involvement of health-care professionals is considered important. However, little is known about the factors associated with changes in family caregiver burden. Objective: To clarify changes in family caregiver burden and associated factors during follow-up at a memory clinic. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, enrolling 495 pairs of patients with dementia or mild cognitive impairment and their family caregivers. A total of 120 pairs completed the second evaluation. The caregiver burden was assessed using the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Data at the initial visit and after an average follow-up of about 2 years were compared and analyzed. Results: At initial visit, the patients’ mean age, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and ZBI scores were 78.6±5.6 years, 23.3±3.5, and 22.6±16.7, respectively. At follow-up, MMSE scores decreased (21.4±4.5, p < 0.001), but ZBI scores remained similar (22.5±13.6). When the difference in ZBI scores between the two time points was defined as ΔZBI, and the related factors were analyzed by multiple regression analysis, ZBI scores at the initial visit, start of psychotropic drug, and decrease of neuropsychiatric symptoms were identified as significant factors (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p < 0.001, respectively). A significant negative correlation was found between ZBI scores at the initial visit and ΔZBI (r = –0.588, p < 0.001). Conclusions: These findings suggest the importance of assessing changes in the burden experienced by family caregivers during the disease follow-up.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆门诊随访期间照顾者负担变化的特征:回顾性队列研究
背景:由于痴呆症是一种长期疾病,因此医疗保健专业人员的适当参与非常重要。然而,人们对与家庭照顾者负担变化相关的因素知之甚少。研究目的明确记忆诊所随访期间家庭照顾者负担的变化及相关因素。方法:进行回顾性队列研究:进行了一项回顾性队列研究,共招募了 495 对痴呆症或轻度认知障碍患者及其家庭照顾者。共有 120 对完成了第二次评估。使用扎里特负担访谈法(ZBI)对照顾者的负担进行了评估。对初次访问和平均随访约 2 年后的数据进行了比较和分析。结果显示初诊时,患者的平均年龄、迷你精神状态检查(MMSE)和 ZBI 评分分别为 78.6±5.6 岁、23.3±3.5 分和 22.6±16.7 分。随访时,MMSE 评分下降(21.4±4.5,p < 0.001),但 ZBI 评分保持相似(22.5±13.6)。将两个时间点之间的 ZBI 分数差值定义为 ΔZBI,并通过多元回归分析对相关因素进行分析,发现初次就诊时的 ZBI 分数、开始使用精神药物和神经精神症状的减少是显著的因素(分别为 p < 0.001、p = 0.003、p < 0.001)。初次就诊时的 ZBI 分数与 ΔZBI 之间存在明显的负相关(r = -0.588,p < 0.001)。结论:这些研究结果表明,在疾病随访期间评估家庭照顾者的负担变化非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Genome-Wide Mendelian Randomization Identifies Ferroptosis-Related Drug Targets for Alzheimer's Disease. The Association Between Brain Metabolic Biomarkers Using 18F-FDG and Cognition and Vascular Risk Factors, as well as Its Usefulness in the Diagnosis and Staging of Alzheimer's Disease. Association Between Kidney Disease Index and Decline in Cognitive Function with Mediation by Arterial Stiffness in Asians with Type 2 Diabetes. Early-Stage Moderate Alcohol Feeding Dysregulates Insulin-Related Metabolic Hormone Expression in the Brain: Potential Links to Neurodegeneration Including Alzheimer's Disease. Use and Reuse of Animal Behavioral, Molecular, and Biochemical Data in Alzheimer's Disease Research: Focus on 3Rs and Saving People's Tax Dollars.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1