Evidence of Stroke in Glaucoma Patients

Monali S. Malvankar-Mehta, Mushfiqur Rahman, Ashvinder Suri, Cindy M. L. Hutnik
{"title":"Evidence of Stroke in Glaucoma Patients","authors":"Monali S. Malvankar-Mehta, Mushfiqur Rahman, Ashvinder Suri, Cindy M. L. Hutnik","doi":"10.1177/25166085231214875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As the communal cause of irreversible vision loss in seniors, glaucoma affects more than 67 million people worldwide. Those who suffer from glaucoma have traditionally demonstrated a higher rate of developing stroke. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between glaucoma and increased stroke risks, but they differ wildly in conclusive findings. To better elucidate the overall findings of the collective studies, a systematic review with the objective of determining the relationship between glaucoma and an increased risk of stroke. Methods: A systematic database search including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library as well as unpublished literature was done. Distiller SR, a systematic review software was utilized. After two levels of screening, “Title and Abstract” and “Full text” screening, risk of bias assessment and extraction of the data from the included articles were conducted. STATA 14.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was the primary outcome measure. Results: Nine studies (376,650 subjects) were included in the analysis. Results indicated a significant hazard of stroke in patients with open-angle glaucoma (HR = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.08, 1.71]), normal-tension glaucoma (HR = 6.34, 95% CI: [4.8, 8.38]), and neovascular glaucoma (HR = 2.07; CI: [1.41, 3.03]). Studies examining risks of stroke development showed a significant increase in the relative risks (RR) of developing stroke for those with glaucoma (RR = 2.10, CI: [1.64, 2.68]). Conclusions: The hazard of developing stroke could be greater for patients with glaucoma. However, randomized controlled trials with longer-term follow-ups need to be conducted in the future in order to make strong conclusions.","PeriodicalId":93323,"journal":{"name":"Journal of stroke medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of stroke medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25166085231214875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As the communal cause of irreversible vision loss in seniors, glaucoma affects more than 67 million people worldwide. Those who suffer from glaucoma have traditionally demonstrated a higher rate of developing stroke. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between glaucoma and increased stroke risks, but they differ wildly in conclusive findings. To better elucidate the overall findings of the collective studies, a systematic review with the objective of determining the relationship between glaucoma and an increased risk of stroke. Methods: A systematic database search including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library as well as unpublished literature was done. Distiller SR, a systematic review software was utilized. After two levels of screening, “Title and Abstract” and “Full text” screening, risk of bias assessment and extraction of the data from the included articles were conducted. STATA 14.0 was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) was the primary outcome measure. Results: Nine studies (376,650 subjects) were included in the analysis. Results indicated a significant hazard of stroke in patients with open-angle glaucoma (HR = 1.36, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.08, 1.71]), normal-tension glaucoma (HR = 6.34, 95% CI: [4.8, 8.38]), and neovascular glaucoma (HR = 2.07; CI: [1.41, 3.03]). Studies examining risks of stroke development showed a significant increase in the relative risks (RR) of developing stroke for those with glaucoma (RR = 2.10, CI: [1.64, 2.68]). Conclusions: The hazard of developing stroke could be greater for patients with glaucoma. However, randomized controlled trials with longer-term follow-ups need to be conducted in the future in order to make strong conclusions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
青光眼患者中风的证据
背景:青光眼是导致老年人视力不可逆转丧失的主要原因,全球有 6700 多万人受到青光眼的影响。青光眼患者的中风发病率历来较高。许多研究都对青光眼与中风风险增加之间的关系进行了调查,但得出的结论却大相径庭。为了更好地阐明这些研究的总体结论,我们进行了一次系统性回顾,目的是确定青光眼与中风风险增加之间的关系。方法:进行了系统的数据库检索,包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆以及未发表的文献。使用了系统综述软件 Distiller SR。经过 "标题与摘要 "和 "全文 "两级筛选后,进行了偏倚风险评估,并从纳入的文章中提取了数据。使用 STATA 14.0 进行荟萃分析。危险比(HR)是衡量研究结果的主要指标。结果分析共纳入 9 项研究(376,650 名受试者)。结果显示,开角型青光眼(HR = 1.36,95% 置信区间 [CI]:[1.08, 1.71])、正常张力青光眼(HR = 6.34,95% 置信区间 [CI]:[4.8, 8.38])和新生血管性青光眼(HR = 2.07; CI:[1.41, 3.03])患者发生脑卒中的风险很大。对中风发生风险的研究显示,青光眼患者发生中风的相对风险 (RR) 显著增加(RR = 2.10,CI:[1.64, 2.68])。结论:青光眼患者罹患中风的风险可能更大。不过,今后需要进行长期随访的随机对照试验,才能得出有力的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Study of the Correlation of Pulsatility Index by Transcranial Doppler in the Clinical Outcome of Patients with Cerebral Venous Sinus 
Thrombosis Acute Ischaemic Stroke in a Young Adult in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Case Report of Post-strangulation Carotid Artery Dissection The Effect of Biological Sex on a County Pre-hospital Stroke Initiative COVID and Vaccine-related Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Expert Consensus on Improving Stroke Care Ecosystem in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1