Role of Symptomatic Management in Understanding Effects of Early Integration of Palliative Care among Nonmetastatic Lung Cancer Patients on Psychological Well-Being

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES European Journal of Cancer Care Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1155/2024/6651067
Arunima Datta, Shrenik Ostwal, Aryama Das
{"title":"Role of Symptomatic Management in Understanding Effects of Early Integration of Palliative Care among Nonmetastatic Lung Cancer Patients on Psychological Well-Being","authors":"Arunima Datta,&nbsp;Shrenik Ostwal,&nbsp;Aryama Das","doi":"10.1155/2024/6651067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Aim</i>. The impact of early referral to palliative care on quality of life for patients with lung cancer has already been discussed. However, the benefits of early integration of palliative care service (EIPCS) combined with standard oncology care for nonmetastatic lung cancer patients remain unclear. Hence, we designed a study to assess the impact of EIPCS among nonmetastatic cancer patients in India. <i>Methods</i>. In this randomized controlled trial study, we divided the data from 115 patients with diagnosed nonmetastatic lung cancer between age group of &gt;18 years to ≥65 years. Following clinicopathological and radiology diagnosis, patients were referred to pain and palliative medicine department. Patients were randomly assigned by palliative physicians into two groups: Group A (<i>N</i> = 64), those who were receiving standard oncology care (chemotherapy or radiation or both) along with EIPCS, and Group B (<i>N</i> = 51), receiving standard oncology care. Patients were followed up every 3 weeks up to 3 months. Primary outcomes, symptoms’ burden, and psychological well-being were measured by validated tools. To define the impact of EIPCS, appropriate statistics were calculated as the mean ± standard deviation of the score of validated tools. Statistical significance was defined at <i>p</i> &lt; 0.005. <i>Results</i>. From the beginning, we had taken 115 patients, and on 42 days’ follow-up, the number of dropout patients for Group A was 3 (due to unable to contact), and for Group B, 9 (due to physical condition). This was followed by a reassessment after 126 days where dropout patients for Group A was 4 (due to unable to contact), and for Group B, 7 (due to physical condition). Following statistical report compliance at 126 days by WEMWBS was 21.16 ± 3.65 in Group A versus 16.1 ± 1.93 versus in Group B and by ESAS 51.84 ± 0.01 in Group A versus 97.64 ± 2.18 in Group B. <i>Conclusion</i>. The findings of this study showed that patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer who received standard oncology care combined with EIPCS had increased the psychological well-being and reduced symptoms burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/6651067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim. The impact of early referral to palliative care on quality of life for patients with lung cancer has already been discussed. However, the benefits of early integration of palliative care service (EIPCS) combined with standard oncology care for nonmetastatic lung cancer patients remain unclear. Hence, we designed a study to assess the impact of EIPCS among nonmetastatic cancer patients in India. Methods. In this randomized controlled trial study, we divided the data from 115 patients with diagnosed nonmetastatic lung cancer between age group of >18 years to ≥65 years. Following clinicopathological and radiology diagnosis, patients were referred to pain and palliative medicine department. Patients were randomly assigned by palliative physicians into two groups: Group A (N = 64), those who were receiving standard oncology care (chemotherapy or radiation or both) along with EIPCS, and Group B (N = 51), receiving standard oncology care. Patients were followed up every 3 weeks up to 3 months. Primary outcomes, symptoms’ burden, and psychological well-being were measured by validated tools. To define the impact of EIPCS, appropriate statistics were calculated as the mean ± standard deviation of the score of validated tools. Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.005. Results. From the beginning, we had taken 115 patients, and on 42 days’ follow-up, the number of dropout patients for Group A was 3 (due to unable to contact), and for Group B, 9 (due to physical condition). This was followed by a reassessment after 126 days where dropout patients for Group A was 4 (due to unable to contact), and for Group B, 7 (due to physical condition). Following statistical report compliance at 126 days by WEMWBS was 21.16 ± 3.65 in Group A versus 16.1 ± 1.93 versus in Group B and by ESAS 51.84 ± 0.01 in Group A versus 97.64 ± 2.18 in Group B. Conclusion. The findings of this study showed that patients with nonmetastatic lung cancer who received standard oncology care combined with EIPCS had increased the psychological well-being and reduced symptoms burden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
症状管理在理解非转移性肺癌患者早期接受姑息治疗对心理健康影响方面的作用
目的早期转诊至姑息治疗对肺癌患者生活质量的影响已有讨论。然而,早期姑息治疗服务(EIPCS)与标准肿瘤治疗相结合对非转移性肺癌患者的益处仍不明确。因此,我们设计了一项研究来评估 EIPCS 对印度非转移性癌症患者的影响。研究方法在这项随机对照试验研究中,我们将 115 名确诊为非转移性肺癌的患者的数据划分为年龄大于 18 岁至≥ 65 岁的年龄组。经临床病理和放射学诊断后,患者被转诊至疼痛与姑息医学科。姑息治疗医生将患者随机分为两组:A组(64人)在接受标准肿瘤治疗(化疗、放疗或两者)的同时接受EIPCS治疗,B组(51人)接受标准肿瘤治疗。患者每 3 周接受一次随访,直至 3 个月。主要结果、症状负担和心理健康状况均由经过验证的工具进行测量。为确定 EIPCS 的影响,适当的统计数据以验证工具得分的平均值 ± 标准差计算。统计意义以 P<0.005 为标准。结果在 42 天的随访中,A 组有 3 人退出(因无法联系),B 组有 9 人退出(因身体状况)。随后在 126 天后进行了重新评估,A 组的辍学人数为 4 人(由于无法联系),B 组为 7 人(由于身体状况)。根据统计报告,126 天后的 WEMWBS 达标率为:A 组 21.16 ± 3.65,B 组 16.1 ± 1.93;ESAS 达标率为:A 组 51.84 ± 0.01,B 组 97.64 ± 2.18。研究结果表明,非转移性肺癌患者在接受标准肿瘤治疗的同时接受 EIPCS 治疗,可提高心理健康水平,减轻症状负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Cancer Care
European Journal of Cancer Care 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of: - Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients - Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care - Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients - Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care - Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members - International perspectives on cancer care
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Nobiletin and 5-Demethylnobiletin as Cancer Chemopreventive Agents The Relationship Between Upper-Limb Lymphedema and Fatigue Among Breast Cancer Survivors Development Process of a Holistic Assessment Questionnaire to Measure and Monitor Cancer-Related Fatigue Faecal Immunochemical Testing in Symptomatic Primary Care Patients: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study Ferroptosis-Related LncRNA BCRP3 Promotes the Proliferation and Migration of Prostate Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1