Bank resolution in South Africa: Recent developments

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Insolvency Review Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1002/iir.1524
Ashley Batsirai Nyaude, Corlia Van Heerden
{"title":"Bank resolution in South Africa: Recent developments","authors":"Ashley Batsirai Nyaude,&nbsp;Corlia Van Heerden","doi":"10.1002/iir.1524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this contribution, the authors explore recent developments in South Africa's approach to bank resolution, assessing compliance of its new regime with the Financial Stability Board's Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions (KAs). Emphasizing the imperative for orderly resolutions to avert financial crises, the authors scrutinize the post-2008 Global Financial Crisis regulatory landscape. Until June 2023, South Africa's approach to bank failure was limited to curatorship and liquidation under the Banks Act 94 of 1990. Addressing gaps identified by international bodies such as the Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, and taking lessons from the failure of African Bank in 2014, South Africa has transitioned to a Twin Peaks regulatory model and also introduced a comprehensive resolution framework effective June 1, 2023, captured in the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017. This framework currently applies to banks only. The South African Reserve Bank now holds an explicit financial stability mandate and is designated as the resolution authority. The article discusses the design features for an effective resolution regime as recommended in the KAs to benchmark the new South African resolution regime, noting overall compliance. However, it acknowledges the need for further development in certain respects to enhance alignment.</p>","PeriodicalId":53971,"journal":{"name":"International Insolvency Review","volume":"33 2","pages":"182-204"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iir.1524","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Insolvency Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this contribution, the authors explore recent developments in South Africa's approach to bank resolution, assessing compliance of its new regime with the Financial Stability Board's Key Attributes of Effective Resolution Regimes for Financial Institutions (KAs). Emphasizing the imperative for orderly resolutions to avert financial crises, the authors scrutinize the post-2008 Global Financial Crisis regulatory landscape. Until June 2023, South Africa's approach to bank failure was limited to curatorship and liquidation under the Banks Act 94 of 1990. Addressing gaps identified by international bodies such as the Financial Stability Board, International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank, and taking lessons from the failure of African Bank in 2014, South Africa has transitioned to a Twin Peaks regulatory model and also introduced a comprehensive resolution framework effective June 1, 2023, captured in the Financial Sector Regulation Act 9 of 2017. This framework currently applies to banks only. The South African Reserve Bank now holds an explicit financial stability mandate and is designated as the resolution authority. The article discusses the design features for an effective resolution regime as recommended in the KAs to benchmark the new South African resolution regime, noting overall compliance. However, it acknowledges the need for further development in certain respects to enhance alignment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非的银行决议:近期发展
在这篇论文中,作者探讨了南非银行决议方法的最新发展,评估了其新制度是否符合金融稳定委员会的《金融机构有效决议制度的关键属性》(KA)。作者强调了有序解决以避免金融危机的必要性,并仔细研究了 2008 年全球金融危机后的监管环境。在 2023 年 6 月之前,南非处理银行倒闭的方法仅限于 1990 年第 94 号《银行法》规定的托管和清算。为弥补金融稳定委员会、国际货币基金组织和世界银行等国际机构所指出的差距,并吸取 2014 年非洲银行倒闭的教训,南非已过渡到双峰监管模式,同时还引入了自 2023 年 6 月 1 日起生效的全面解决框架,该框架载于 2017 年第 9 号《金融部门监管法案》。该框架目前仅适用于银行。南非储备银行现在拥有明确的金融稳定授权,并被指定为决议机构。文章讨论了《主要行动建议》中建议的有效决议制度的设计特点,以南非新的决议制度为基准,并指出了总体合规性。不过,文章承认有必要在某些方面进一步发展,以加强一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Navigating the evolving seas of cross-border insolvency: The shift towards COMI and the Model Law approach in Hong Kong; Re Global Brands Group Holding Ltd (In Liquidation) [2022] 3 HKLRD 316 (Coram Harris J) [case comment] The purpose of directors' duties in the insolvency context: A critical assessment based on empirical data from Austria and Netherlands Legislative developments in personal insolvency in China’s mainland: A comparative analysis of regional practices in China’s mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan Region Retail company voluntary arrangements: A dubious remedy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1