The analysis of variables affecting patient satisfaction and its level in a hospital emergency department based on a selected emergency unit

A. Lisowska, Katarzyna Szwamel, Arkadiusz Wilczek
{"title":"The analysis of variables affecting patient satisfaction and its level in a hospital emergency department based on a selected emergency unit","authors":"A. Lisowska, Katarzyna Szwamel, Arkadiusz Wilczek","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0054.3354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Patient satisfaction is perceived as one of the major criterium while evaluating the quality in the field of medical services.Aim of the study. Analysing and evaluating the level of satisfaction with the services provided by medical and nursing staff among patients of a selected Emergency Department (ED).Material and methods. The observational study was conducted from September to December 2022. The research was based on the data collected from 122 patients of the ED. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and self- prepared questionnaire were used.Results. Using an 11-grade scale from 0 – 10 (0 – the worst of all possible hospitals, 10 – the best of all possible hospitals), only 15.83% (19) evaluated the researched hospital as ‘the best’. Most of the respondents - 23.33% (28) gave the hospital an 8 or 9 - point rate - 18.33% (22). While patients’ asked how often they were treated with respect and kindness by the nursing staff, the respondents most frequently answered ‘always’ - 70.83% (85) or ‘usually’ - 27.50% (33). While asked how often the doctors treated them with respect and kindness, most frequently answered ‘always’ - 61.67% (74) or ‘usually’ - 26.67% (32). Age and gender of patients did not significantly affect the level of satisfaction with care (p>0.005). However, the higher the level of education, the lower the willingness to recommend the hospital to family or friends (p=0.027). Conclusions. General satisfaction with hospitalization was at a high level. The more educated the patients were, the lower the readiness to recommend the hospital to family or friends. The ED staff should take into consideration this fact while planning care in hospital emergency departments.","PeriodicalId":32604,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science Pulse","volume":"71 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science Pulse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0054.3354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Patient satisfaction is perceived as one of the major criterium while evaluating the quality in the field of medical services.Aim of the study. Analysing and evaluating the level of satisfaction with the services provided by medical and nursing staff among patients of a selected Emergency Department (ED).Material and methods. The observational study was conducted from September to December 2022. The research was based on the data collected from 122 patients of the ED. The Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire and self- prepared questionnaire were used.Results. Using an 11-grade scale from 0 – 10 (0 – the worst of all possible hospitals, 10 – the best of all possible hospitals), only 15.83% (19) evaluated the researched hospital as ‘the best’. Most of the respondents - 23.33% (28) gave the hospital an 8 or 9 - point rate - 18.33% (22). While patients’ asked how often they were treated with respect and kindness by the nursing staff, the respondents most frequently answered ‘always’ - 70.83% (85) or ‘usually’ - 27.50% (33). While asked how often the doctors treated them with respect and kindness, most frequently answered ‘always’ - 61.67% (74) or ‘usually’ - 26.67% (32). Age and gender of patients did not significantly affect the level of satisfaction with care (p>0.005). However, the higher the level of education, the lower the willingness to recommend the hospital to family or friends (p=0.027). Conclusions. General satisfaction with hospitalization was at a high level. The more educated the patients were, the lower the readiness to recommend the hospital to family or friends. The ED staff should take into consideration this fact while planning care in hospital emergency departments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据选定的急诊科分析影响医院急诊科患者满意度的变量及其水平
引言患者满意度是评价医疗服务质量的主要标准之一。分析和评估选定急诊科(ED)患者对医护人员服务的满意度。观察研究于 2022 年 9 月至 12 月进行。研究基于从该急诊科 122 名患者收集到的数据。研究使用了患者满意度问卷和自拟问卷。采用 0-10 分的 11 级评分法(0 分--所有可能的医院中最差的,10 分--所有可能的医院中最好的),只有 15.83%(19 人)将所研究的医院评为 "最好的"。大多数受访者--23.33%(28 人)--给医院打了 8 分或 9 分,占 18.33%(22 人)。当病人被问及护理人员给予他们尊重和友善对待的频率时,受访者最常回答的是 "总是" - 70.83% (85 人)或 "通常" - 27.50% (33 人)。当被问及医生对他们的态度如何时,回答 "总是 "或 "通常 "的最多,分别占 61.67%(74 人)和 26.67%(32 人)。患者的年龄和性别对护理满意度的影响不大(P>0.005)。然而,受教育程度越高,向家人或朋友推荐医院的意愿越低(p=0.027)。结论住院治疗的总体满意度较高。患者受教育程度越高,向家人或朋友推荐医院的意愿越低。急诊科工作人员在制定医院急诊科护理计划时应考虑到这一事实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical trials of new therapies for mucopolysaccharidoses Implementation of telemedicine solutions in the field of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: risk management and remedial actions Does the use of hirudotherapy reduce pain? A narrative review 1st International Conference MRTBS 2024 Modern research trends in biomedical sciences: a holistic approach to health care BOOK OF ABSTRACTS SUPPLEMENT 3 The role of mivacurium in contemporary anesthesiology: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1