Thresholds for dis/trust: exploring the impact of standards-based reforms on the process of being and becoming a VET teacher in England and Austria

Christina Donovan, Hannes Hautz
{"title":"Thresholds for dis/trust: exploring the impact of standards-based reforms on the process of being and becoming a VET teacher in England and Austria","authors":"Christina Donovan, Hannes Hautz","doi":"10.1108/et-09-2023-0386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis paper seeks to illustrate how interventionist education reforms shape dis/trust-building processes and their impact on teacher professionalism in vocational education and training (VET) across national contexts. Using trust as the object of analysis, we discuss the affective mechanisms of becoming a professional in a standards-based neoliberal environment.Design/methodology/approachThrough an analysis of VET teacher narratives in England and Austria, the paper draws attention to the ways in which policy instrumentalism has created a culture of distrust in VET. Drawing upon foundational work on system trust developed by Niklas Luhmann, we illustrate how conditions for trust sit at symbolic thresholds, which set the conditions for professional recognition within VET.FindingsOur analysis revealed that attempts to standardise VET strategy are fuelled by the need for existential security and predictability, leading to tensions in the cultivation of system trust. Conditions for professional recognition across both contexts were based on practices of documentation and subordination, narrowly defining modes of legitimate self-expression in organisations. This constitutes a crisis of trust in VET teacher professionalism, which undermines pedagogical autonomy and integrity.Practical implicationsWe seek to highlight the impact that reduced trust in the governance of VET can have on issues associated with teacher motivation, well-being and retention. The consideration of trust is therefore essential both for policy design and implementation in VET organisations.Originality/valueThe application of trust theory offers a distinctive lens through which to understand the impact of accountability, performativity and governance processes upon teacher subjectivity within VET across national contexts.","PeriodicalId":503966,"journal":{"name":"Education + Training","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education + Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/et-09-2023-0386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis paper seeks to illustrate how interventionist education reforms shape dis/trust-building processes and their impact on teacher professionalism in vocational education and training (VET) across national contexts. Using trust as the object of analysis, we discuss the affective mechanisms of becoming a professional in a standards-based neoliberal environment.Design/methodology/approachThrough an analysis of VET teacher narratives in England and Austria, the paper draws attention to the ways in which policy instrumentalism has created a culture of distrust in VET. Drawing upon foundational work on system trust developed by Niklas Luhmann, we illustrate how conditions for trust sit at symbolic thresholds, which set the conditions for professional recognition within VET.FindingsOur analysis revealed that attempts to standardise VET strategy are fuelled by the need for existential security and predictability, leading to tensions in the cultivation of system trust. Conditions for professional recognition across both contexts were based on practices of documentation and subordination, narrowly defining modes of legitimate self-expression in organisations. This constitutes a crisis of trust in VET teacher professionalism, which undermines pedagogical autonomy and integrity.Practical implicationsWe seek to highlight the impact that reduced trust in the governance of VET can have on issues associated with teacher motivation, well-being and retention. The consideration of trust is therefore essential both for policy design and implementation in VET organisations.Originality/valueThe application of trust theory offers a distinctive lens through which to understand the impact of accountability, performativity and governance processes upon teacher subjectivity within VET across national contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不信任/不信任的门槛:探讨基于标准的改革对英格兰和奥地利职业教育与培训教师的产生和发展过程的影响
本文旨在说明干预性教育改革如何形成不信任/信任的建立过程及其对各国职业教育与培训(VET)中教师专业性的影响。本文以信任为分析对象,讨论了在基于标准的新自由主义环境中成为专业人员的情感机制。通过分析英格兰和奥地利的职业教育与培训教师的叙述,本文提请人们注意政策工具主义在职业教育与培训中创造不信任文化的方式。根据尼克拉斯-卢曼(Niklas Luhmann)关于系统信任的基础研究,我们说明了信任的条件如何处于象征性的临界点,而这些临界点为职业教育与培训中的专业认可创造了条件。研究结果我们的分析表明,职业教育与培训战略标准化的尝试受到了对生存安全和可预测性的需求的推动,从而导致了系统信任培养过程中的紧张关系。在这两种情况下,专业认可的条件都建立在文件和从属关系的实践基础上,狭隘地界定了组织中合法的自我表达方式。我们试图强调对职业教育与培训管理的信任度降低可能对教师的积极性、福利和留任产生的影响。原创性/价值信任理论的应用提供了一个独特的视角,通过这一视角,我们可以了解各国职教中的问责制、表演性和管理过程对教师主体性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovation and sustainability from the perspective of entrepreneurial intention: a cross-cultural approach Innovation and sustainability from the perspective of entrepreneurial intention: a cross-cultural approach Students’ first professional placement: unravelling expectations and realities Variety of entrepreneurial skills measured in the entrepreneurship education literature The role of training in the “school-to-work” transition in the Russian labour market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1