Predicting repeat consumer bankruptcy: A survival analysis of business-related repeat filings in Australia 2007–2021

IF 0.5 3区 社会学 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE International Insolvency Review Pub Date : 2024-02-05 DOI:10.1002/iir.1527
Catherine Robinson, David Smith, Mark Wicht, Amanda Rice, Gavin McCosker, Ignatius McBride
{"title":"Predicting repeat consumer bankruptcy: A survival analysis of business-related repeat filings in Australia 2007–2021","authors":"Catherine Robinson,&nbsp;David Smith,&nbsp;Mark Wicht,&nbsp;Amanda Rice,&nbsp;Gavin McCosker,&nbsp;Ignatius McBride","doi":"10.1002/iir.1527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ongoing legislative responses to the impacts of the pandemic have prompted many countries to evaluate whether their bankruptcy systems remain fit for purpose. Moreover, the current climate highlights the importance of data-driven policy, which the literature identifies as a deficiency of bankruptcy regimes. In Australia, the 2015 reform proposals to reduce the default discharge period from 3 years to 1 year are currently being revised amidst stakeholder concern about potential abuse and repeat bankrupts. Although an extensive body of literature exists on ‘repeat filers’ in the USA, there has been no equivalent study in Australia. Using our data of 153,526 bankruptcies between 2007 and 2021, we conducted a novel application of survival analysis to predict the probability of a repeat bankruptcy comparing business and non-business groups. The results show that this probability peaked in both male and females with non-business-related administrations irrespective of client's age, employment and relationship status. These findings are important as they identify the prospects that certain bankrupt groups have higher rates of repeat bankruptcy, which can inform strategies to improve their survival rate. A significance of our study is the development of a high-quality longitudinal dataset that facilitates the extension of the data models and allows easy updates about targeted questions involving bankruptcy-related policy shifts and impacts on sub-populations. This methodological approach will enable regulators and insolvency experts to address concerns of repeat bankruptcy to guide policy, evaluate reform and extend the evidence base in other jurisdictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53971,"journal":{"name":"International Insolvency Review","volume":"33 2","pages":"159-181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iir.1527","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Insolvency Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iir.1527","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ongoing legislative responses to the impacts of the pandemic have prompted many countries to evaluate whether their bankruptcy systems remain fit for purpose. Moreover, the current climate highlights the importance of data-driven policy, which the literature identifies as a deficiency of bankruptcy regimes. In Australia, the 2015 reform proposals to reduce the default discharge period from 3 years to 1 year are currently being revised amidst stakeholder concern about potential abuse and repeat bankrupts. Although an extensive body of literature exists on ‘repeat filers’ in the USA, there has been no equivalent study in Australia. Using our data of 153,526 bankruptcies between 2007 and 2021, we conducted a novel application of survival analysis to predict the probability of a repeat bankruptcy comparing business and non-business groups. The results show that this probability peaked in both male and females with non-business-related administrations irrespective of client's age, employment and relationship status. These findings are important as they identify the prospects that certain bankrupt groups have higher rates of repeat bankruptcy, which can inform strategies to improve their survival rate. A significance of our study is the development of a high-quality longitudinal dataset that facilitates the extension of the data models and allows easy updates about targeted questions involving bankruptcy-related policy shifts and impacts on sub-populations. This methodological approach will enable regulators and insolvency experts to address concerns of repeat bankruptcy to guide policy, evaluate reform and extend the evidence base in other jurisdictions.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预测消费者重复破产:2007-2021 年澳大利亚与企业有关的重复申请存活分析
目前针对大流行病影响的立法对策促使许多国家评估其破产制度是否仍然适合目的。此外,当前的环境凸显了数据驱动政策的重要性,而文献指出这是破产制度的不足之处。在澳大利亚,2015 年提出的将违约解除期从 3 年缩短至 1 年的改革建议目前正在修订中,因为利益相关者担心潜在的滥用和重复破产。虽然在美国有大量关于 "重复申请者 "的文献,但在澳大利亚还没有类似的研究。利用 2007 年至 2021 年间 153,526 起破产案件的数据,我们采用新颖的生存分析方法,对企业和非企业群体重复破产的概率进行了预测。结果表明,无论客户的年龄、就业和关系状况如何,男性和女性在与企业无关的行政管理中重复破产的概率都达到了峰值。这些发现非常重要,因为它们确定了某些破产群体重复破产率较高的前景,这可以为提高其存活率的策略提供参考。我们这项研究的一个重要意义在于开发了一个高质量的纵向数据集,便于扩展数据模型,并可轻松更新涉及破产相关政策转变和对亚人群影响的目标问题。这种方法论将使监管机构和破产专家能够解决重复破产问题,以指导政策、评估改革并扩展其他司法管辖区的证据基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
33.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Navigating the evolving seas of cross-border insolvency: The shift towards COMI and the Model Law approach in Hong Kong; Re Global Brands Group Holding Ltd (In Liquidation) [2022] 3 HKLRD 316 (Coram Harris J) [case comment] The purpose of directors' duties in the insolvency context: A critical assessment based on empirical data from Austria and Netherlands Legislative developments in personal insolvency in China’s mainland: A comparative analysis of regional practices in China’s mainland, Hong Kong, and Taiwan Region Retail company voluntary arrangements: A dubious remedy?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1