Public preferences for vaccination campaigns in the COVID-19 endemic phase: insights from the VaxPref database

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100849
Marcello Antonini , Mesfin G. Genie , Arthur E. Attema , Katie Attwell , Zsolt J. Balogh , Daiga Behmane , Chiara Berardi , Shuli Brammli-Greenberg , Andrew Greenland , Terje P. Hagen , Madeleine Hinwood , Carole James , Adrian Kellner , Brian Kelly , Liubovė Murauskienė , Neil McGregor , Alessia Melegaro , Naomi Moy , Ana Rita Sequeira , Renu Singh , Francesco Paolucci
{"title":"Public preferences for vaccination campaigns in the COVID-19 endemic phase: insights from the VaxPref database","authors":"Marcello Antonini ,&nbsp;Mesfin G. Genie ,&nbsp;Arthur E. Attema ,&nbsp;Katie Attwell ,&nbsp;Zsolt J. Balogh ,&nbsp;Daiga Behmane ,&nbsp;Chiara Berardi ,&nbsp;Shuli Brammli-Greenberg ,&nbsp;Andrew Greenland ,&nbsp;Terje P. Hagen ,&nbsp;Madeleine Hinwood ,&nbsp;Carole James ,&nbsp;Adrian Kellner ,&nbsp;Brian Kelly ,&nbsp;Liubovė Murauskienė ,&nbsp;Neil McGregor ,&nbsp;Alessia Melegaro ,&nbsp;Naomi Moy ,&nbsp;Ana Rita Sequeira ,&nbsp;Renu Singh ,&nbsp;Francesco Paolucci","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Despite widespread perceptions that SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is no longer a significant threat, the virus continues to loom, and new variants may require renewed efforts to control its spread. Understanding how individual preferences and attitudes influence vaccination behaviour and policy compliance in light of the endemic phase is crucial in preparation for this scenario.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>This paper presents descriptive data from a global stated choice survey conducted in 22 countries across 6 different continents between July 2022 and August 2023, and reports the methodological work developed to address the need for comparable data.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>This study included 50,242 respondents. Findings indicated significant heterogeneity across countries in terms of vaccination status and willingness to accept boosters. Vaccine hesitancy and refusal were driven by lower trust in public health bodies, younger age, and lower educational levels. Refusers and hesitant people reported lower willingness to take risks compared to those fully vaccinated (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05). Lower mental health levels were found for the hesitant cohort (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Insights from this database can help public health authorities to gain a new understanding of the vaccine hesitancy phenomenon, support them in managing the transition from the pandemic to the endemic phase, and favour a new stream of research to maximise behavioural response to vaccination programs in preparation of future pandemics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 1","pages":"Article 100849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000121/pdfft?md5=d967c5b8e8fa95ed709179851ee893c3&pid=1-s2.0-S2211883724000121-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Despite widespread perceptions that SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is no longer a significant threat, the virus continues to loom, and new variants may require renewed efforts to control its spread. Understanding how individual preferences and attitudes influence vaccination behaviour and policy compliance in light of the endemic phase is crucial in preparation for this scenario.

Method

This paper presents descriptive data from a global stated choice survey conducted in 22 countries across 6 different continents between July 2022 and August 2023, and reports the methodological work developed to address the need for comparable data.

Results

This study included 50,242 respondents. Findings indicated significant heterogeneity across countries in terms of vaccination status and willingness to accept boosters. Vaccine hesitancy and refusal were driven by lower trust in public health bodies, younger age, and lower educational levels. Refusers and hesitant people reported lower willingness to take risks compared to those fully vaccinated (p<0.05). Lower mental health levels were found for the hesitant cohort (p<0.05).

Conclusions

Insights from this database can help public health authorities to gain a new understanding of the vaccine hesitancy phenomenon, support them in managing the transition from the pandemic to the endemic phase, and favour a new stream of research to maximise behavioural response to vaccination programs in preparation of future pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 流行阶段公众对疫苗接种活动的偏好:从 VaxPref 数据库中获得的启示
尽管人们普遍认为 SARS-CoV-2(COVID-19)已不再是一个重大威胁,但该病毒仍在继续蔓延,而且新的变种可能需要重新努力控制其传播。本文介绍了 2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 8 月期间在 6 个不同大洲的 22 个国家进行的全球陈述选择调查的描述性数据,并报告了为满足对可比数据的需求而开发的方法。研究结果表明,各国在疫苗接种状况和接受强化免疫的意愿方面存在很大差异。对公共卫生机构的信任度较低、年龄较小和受教育程度较低是导致犹豫不决和拒绝接种疫苗的原因。与完全接种者相比,拒绝接种者和犹豫不决者承担风险的意愿较低(p<0.05)。结论从该数据库中获得的信息有助于公共卫生机构对疫苗犹豫现象有一个新的认识,支持他们管理从流行病阶段到地方病阶段的过渡,并有利于开展新的研究,最大限度地提高对疫苗接种计划的行为反应,为未来的流行病做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1