Co-RISK: a tool to co-create impactful university–industry projects for natural hazard risk mitigation

Q2 Social Sciences Geoscience Communication Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.5194/gc-7-35-2024
J. Hillier, Michiel van Meeteren
{"title":"Co-RISK: a tool to co-create impactful university–industry projects for natural hazard risk mitigation","authors":"J. Hillier, Michiel van Meeteren","doi":"10.5194/gc-7-35-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Translation of geoscience research into tangible changes, such as modified decisions, processes, or policy, in the wider world is an important yet notably difficult process. Illustratively, university-based scientists and professionals work on different timescales, seek different insights, and may have a substantial cognitive distance between them. The work on Co-RISK reported in this paper is motivated by an ongoing need for mechanisms to aid this translation process. Co-RISK is an accessible (i.e. open access, paper based, zero cost) toolkit for use by stakeholder groups within workshops. Co-RISK has been developed to aid the co-creation of collaborative inter-organisational projects to translate risk-related science into modified actions. It is shaped to avoid adding to a proliferation in increasingly complex frameworks for assessing natural hazard risk and is given a robust basis by incorporating paradox theory from organisation studies, which deal with navigating the genuine tensions between industry and research organisations that stem from their differing roles. Specifically designed to ameliorate the organisational paradox, a Co-RISK workshop draws up “maps” including key stakeholders (e.g. regulator, insurer, university) and their positionality (e.g. barriers, concerns, motivations) and identifies exactly the points where science might modify actions. Ultimately a Co-RISK workshop drafts simple and tailored project-specific frameworks that span from climate to hazard, to risk, to implications of that risk (e.g. solvency). The action research approach used to design Co-RISK, its implementation in a trial session for the insurance sector, and its intellectual contribution are described and evaluated. The initial Co-RISK workshop was well received so it is envisaged to be applicable to other sectors (i.e. transport infrastructure, utilities, government). Joint endeavours enabled by Co-RISK could fulfil the genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies.\n","PeriodicalId":52877,"journal":{"name":"Geoscience Communication","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoscience Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-7-35-2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Translation of geoscience research into tangible changes, such as modified decisions, processes, or policy, in the wider world is an important yet notably difficult process. Illustratively, university-based scientists and professionals work on different timescales, seek different insights, and may have a substantial cognitive distance between them. The work on Co-RISK reported in this paper is motivated by an ongoing need for mechanisms to aid this translation process. Co-RISK is an accessible (i.e. open access, paper based, zero cost) toolkit for use by stakeholder groups within workshops. Co-RISK has been developed to aid the co-creation of collaborative inter-organisational projects to translate risk-related science into modified actions. It is shaped to avoid adding to a proliferation in increasingly complex frameworks for assessing natural hazard risk and is given a robust basis by incorporating paradox theory from organisation studies, which deal with navigating the genuine tensions between industry and research organisations that stem from their differing roles. Specifically designed to ameliorate the organisational paradox, a Co-RISK workshop draws up “maps” including key stakeholders (e.g. regulator, insurer, university) and their positionality (e.g. barriers, concerns, motivations) and identifies exactly the points where science might modify actions. Ultimately a Co-RISK workshop drafts simple and tailored project-specific frameworks that span from climate to hazard, to risk, to implications of that risk (e.g. solvency). The action research approach used to design Co-RISK, its implementation in a trial session for the insurance sector, and its intellectual contribution are described and evaluated. The initial Co-RISK workshop was well received so it is envisaged to be applicable to other sectors (i.e. transport infrastructure, utilities, government). Joint endeavours enabled by Co-RISK could fulfil the genuine need to quickly convert the latest insights from environmental research into real-world climate change adaptation strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Co-RISK:共同创建有影响力的大学-产业项目以减轻自然灾害风险的工具
摘要。将地球科学研究转化为更广阔世界中的实际变化,如修改决策、流程或政策,是一个重要而又明显困难的过程。举例来说,大学科学家和专业人员的工作时间尺度不同,寻求的见解也不同,他们之间可能存在很大的认知距离。本文所报告的 Co-RISK 工作是出于对帮助这一翻译过程的机制的持续需求。Co-RISK 是一个可供利益相关群体在研讨会中使用的工具包(即开放存取、基于纸张、零成本)。开发 Co-RISK 的目的是帮助共同创建组织间合作项目,将与风险相关的科学转化为修改后的行动。设计该工具包的目的是为了避免自然灾害风险评估框架变得越来越复杂,并通过结合组织研究中的悖论理论为其奠定坚实的基础,该理论涉及如何处理工业界与研究机构之间因角色不同而产生的真正紧张关系。为改善组织悖论,Co-RISK 研讨班专门绘制了 "地图",其中包括主要利益相关者(如监管机构、保险公司、大学)及其立场(如障碍、担忧、动机),并准确识别出科学可能改变行动的要点。最终,Co-RISK 研讨班起草了针对具体项目的简单而有针对性的框架,从气候到危害、风险,再到风险的影响(如偿付能力)。本文介绍并评估了设计 Co-RISK 所采用的行动研究方法、其在保险行业试验会议中的实施情况及其智力贡献。最初的 Co-RISK 研讨会广受好评,因此预计它也适用于其他部门(如交通基础设施、公用事业、政府)。Co-RISK 所促成的共同努力可以满足将环境研究的最新见解迅速转化为现实世界气候变化适应战略的真正需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoscience Communication
Geoscience Communication Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
A collaborative adaptation game for promoting climate action: Minions of Disruptions™ Air pollution walk as an impact education tool for air quality sensitization: a pilot from an Indian megacity Quantifying and communicating uncertain climate change hazards in participatory climate change adaptation processes Rocks Really Rock: electronic field trips via Web Google Earth can generate positive impacts in attitudes toward Earth sciences in middle- and high-school students Evaluating the impact of climate communication activities by scientists: what is known and necessary?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1