Using Darwin’s Pangenesis Correspondences to Examine Science as a Human Endeavor

Anthony W. Lorsbach, Allison Antink Meyer
{"title":"Using Darwin’s Pangenesis Correspondences to Examine Science as a Human Endeavor","authors":"Anthony W. Lorsbach, Allison Antink Meyer","doi":"10.1525/abt.2024.86.2.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This lesson used the correspondence of Charles Darwin as an exploration of nature of science (NOS) in a historical context. Specifically, we used his original correspondence about his “provisional hypothesis” of pangenesis as a novel way to explore a scientist’s social community. Darwin’s community of friends and colleagues in the natural sciences at the time of his writing of his 1868 book Variations formed the basis of this lesson. One basic descriptor of NOS, science as a human endeavor, was used to drive explicit reflection. These letters were rich in detail regarding the idea of science as a community of practice. Our elementary education students’ responses indicate the letters surprised them in how personal the correspondents were with one another and how reliant Darwin was on his friends and colleagues for input on his work. Darwin became human as students imagined Darwin’s mental state and how he wrestled with his idea and made it public. Students learned that despite Darwin’s fame, his idea of pangenesis lacked empirical evidence and thus received little support. They discovered an eminent scientist who was insecure and nervous and who worked hard to develop, study, and publicize his novel idea. This contrasts with popular views of major scientific figures as natural geniuses rather than their success resulting from labor and perseverance.","PeriodicalId":513114,"journal":{"name":"The American Biology Teacher","volume":"17 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Biology Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2024.86.2.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This lesson used the correspondence of Charles Darwin as an exploration of nature of science (NOS) in a historical context. Specifically, we used his original correspondence about his “provisional hypothesis” of pangenesis as a novel way to explore a scientist’s social community. Darwin’s community of friends and colleagues in the natural sciences at the time of his writing of his 1868 book Variations formed the basis of this lesson. One basic descriptor of NOS, science as a human endeavor, was used to drive explicit reflection. These letters were rich in detail regarding the idea of science as a community of practice. Our elementary education students’ responses indicate the letters surprised them in how personal the correspondents were with one another and how reliant Darwin was on his friends and colleagues for input on his work. Darwin became human as students imagined Darwin’s mental state and how he wrestled with his idea and made it public. Students learned that despite Darwin’s fame, his idea of pangenesis lacked empirical evidence and thus received little support. They discovered an eminent scientist who was insecure and nervous and who worked hard to develop, study, and publicize his novel idea. This contrasts with popular views of major scientific figures as natural geniuses rather than their success resulting from labor and perseverance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用达尔文的庞加莱对应关系将科学视为人类的一项事业
本课利用查尔斯-达尔文的通信,在历史背景下探索科学的本质(NOS)。具体来说,我们使用了他关于庞加莱 "临时假说 "的原始书信,以一种新颖的方式来探索科学家的社会群体。达尔文在 1868 年撰写《变异》一书时,他在自然科学领域的朋友和同事构成了本课的基础。国家观测系统的一个基本描述--科学是人类的事业--被用来推动明确的思考。这些信件详细阐述了科学作为实践社区的理念。初等教育专业学生的回答表明,这些信件让他们感到惊讶的是,通信者之间的关系是如此亲密,达尔文是多么依赖他的朋友和同事为他的工作提供意见。当学生们想象达尔文的精神状态以及他如何与自己的想法搏斗并将其公之于众时,达尔文变得人性化了。学生们了解到,尽管达尔文声名显赫,但他的 "泛生论 "思想缺乏经验证据,因此几乎得不到支持。他们发现这位杰出的科学家缺乏安全感,精神紧张,他努力地发展、研究和宣传他的新想法。这与人们普遍认为主要科学人物是天生的天才,而不是他们的成功源于劳动和毅力的观点形成了鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Visualizing Genomic Medicine An Investigation of the Impact of Online and In-Person Delivery of Undergraduate Biology Instruction Tactile Trees An Apple a Day Keeps the Gray Mold Away Utilizing the Power of Cooperative Learning to Teach Controversial Topics such as Genetically Modified Organisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1