{"title":"A contrastive analysis of English deverbal -er synthetic compounds and their Italian\n equivalents","authors":"Elisa Mattiello","doi":"10.1075/lic.23005.mat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This study deals with English synthetic compounds ending in -er, such as heartbreaker,\n time-killer, and bodybuilder, and their Italian equivalents. Synthetic compounds are very productive\n in Germanic languages (e.g. E. heartbreaker, G. Herzensbrecher, D.\n hartenbreker), but virtually absent in Romance languages, where various morphological forms and word-formation\n strategies are used to render the same concepts (cf. It. rubacuori, Sp. rompecorazones, Fr.\n tombeur). The analysis of English synthetic compounds still remains a controversial topic in morphological\n accounts, with a lively theoretical debate between two mutually exclusive hypotheses, i.e. whether synthetic compounds have to be\n analyzed as derivations (i.e. [[heart break] [-er]]) or as compounds (i.e.\n [[heart] [break-er]]). In word-formation, they are part of transitional morphology, i.e.\n they have an ambivalent status between derivation and compounding. This study explores a collection of about 100 English synthetic\n compounds drawn from the English Lexicon Project database and compares them with their possible Italian\n renditions. The contrastive analysis mainly aims at highlighting differences between the two morphological systems (cf. E.\n time-killer/It. passatempo). Moreover, the study examines the translation procedures used to\n render English synthetic compounds in OPUS2 Italian. Corpus-based results confirm that English and Italian display\n language-specific constructions which may result in mis- or under-translation.","PeriodicalId":43502,"journal":{"name":"Languages in Contrast","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Languages in Contrast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/lic.23005.mat","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study deals with English synthetic compounds ending in -er, such as heartbreaker,
time-killer, and bodybuilder, and their Italian equivalents. Synthetic compounds are very productive
in Germanic languages (e.g. E. heartbreaker, G. Herzensbrecher, D.
hartenbreker), but virtually absent in Romance languages, where various morphological forms and word-formation
strategies are used to render the same concepts (cf. It. rubacuori, Sp. rompecorazones, Fr.
tombeur). The analysis of English synthetic compounds still remains a controversial topic in morphological
accounts, with a lively theoretical debate between two mutually exclusive hypotheses, i.e. whether synthetic compounds have to be
analyzed as derivations (i.e. [[heart break] [-er]]) or as compounds (i.e.
[[heart] [break-er]]). In word-formation, they are part of transitional morphology, i.e.
they have an ambivalent status between derivation and compounding. This study explores a collection of about 100 English synthetic
compounds drawn from the English Lexicon Project database and compares them with their possible Italian
renditions. The contrastive analysis mainly aims at highlighting differences between the two morphological systems (cf. E.
time-killer/It. passatempo). Moreover, the study examines the translation procedures used to
render English synthetic compounds in OPUS2 Italian. Corpus-based results confirm that English and Italian display
language-specific constructions which may result in mis- or under-translation.
期刊介绍:
Languages in Contrast aims to publish contrastive studies of two or more languages. Any aspect of language may be covered, including vocabulary, phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, text and discourse, stylistics, sociolinguistics and psycholinguistics. Languages in Contrast welcomes interdisciplinary studies, particularly those that make links between contrastive linguistics and translation, lexicography, computational linguistics, language teaching, literary and linguistic computing, literary studies and cultural studies.