An assessment of the role of geophysics in future U.S. geologic carbon storage projects

David L. Alumbaugh, Julia Correa, Preston Jordan, Brigitte Petras, Sahchit Chundur, William Abriel
{"title":"An assessment of the role of geophysics in future U.S. geologic carbon storage projects","authors":"David L. Alumbaugh, Julia Correa, Preston Jordan, Brigitte Petras, Sahchit Chundur, William Abriel","doi":"10.1190/tle43020072.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geologic carbon storage (GCS) is ramping up worldwide as a viable component of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) projects aimed at reducing greenhouse pollution to limit climate change. GCS may be a growth opportunity for the application of geophysics in reservoir characterization and monitoring. Federal and state government financial incentives are the economic motivators of the CCUS business in the United States, and recent increases in these incentives have triggered a large number of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Class VI permit applications to inject CO2 for GCS. The applications indicate that almost all such projects propose using geophysical technology for monitoring. We assessed the GCS geophysical market in the United States based on an intensive analysis of recently filed Class VI permit applications. The analysis shows that reprocessing of existing seismic data will be the primary geophysical activity for reservoir characterization prior to CO2 injection. For monitoring, verification, and recording of CO2 injection, time-lapse vertical seismic profiling and 3D seismic imaging will be the dominant technologies followed by 2D time-lapse seismic imaging and some nonseismic methods. Passive seismic monitoring is planned for the majority of CCUS projects to reduce the risk of induced seismicity. If assumptions related to the United States meeting its current climate goals by 2050 are met, then geophysical activity will increase over the next 30 years. An estimate of the seismic crew count needed to support the projects suggests that the scale of GCS-related seismic acquisition by 2050 may reach the current level of onshore oil and gas geophysics crews in the United States. While the economic incentives of a regulation-driven market will press for the minimization of geophysical sensing in GCS, there is also the potential for growth in geophysical activity with the development of advanced processing and analysis tools, multiphysics data interpretation, and cost-effective continuous monitoring.","PeriodicalId":507626,"journal":{"name":"The Leading Edge","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Leading Edge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1190/tle43020072.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geologic carbon storage (GCS) is ramping up worldwide as a viable component of carbon capture, utilization, and storage (CCUS) projects aimed at reducing greenhouse pollution to limit climate change. GCS may be a growth opportunity for the application of geophysics in reservoir characterization and monitoring. Federal and state government financial incentives are the economic motivators of the CCUS business in the United States, and recent increases in these incentives have triggered a large number of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Class VI permit applications to inject CO2 for GCS. The applications indicate that almost all such projects propose using geophysical technology for monitoring. We assessed the GCS geophysical market in the United States based on an intensive analysis of recently filed Class VI permit applications. The analysis shows that reprocessing of existing seismic data will be the primary geophysical activity for reservoir characterization prior to CO2 injection. For monitoring, verification, and recording of CO2 injection, time-lapse vertical seismic profiling and 3D seismic imaging will be the dominant technologies followed by 2D time-lapse seismic imaging and some nonseismic methods. Passive seismic monitoring is planned for the majority of CCUS projects to reduce the risk of induced seismicity. If assumptions related to the United States meeting its current climate goals by 2050 are met, then geophysical activity will increase over the next 30 years. An estimate of the seismic crew count needed to support the projects suggests that the scale of GCS-related seismic acquisition by 2050 may reach the current level of onshore oil and gas geophysics crews in the United States. While the economic incentives of a regulation-driven market will press for the minimization of geophysical sensing in GCS, there is also the potential for growth in geophysical activity with the development of advanced processing and analysis tools, multiphysics data interpretation, and cost-effective continuous monitoring.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估地球物理学在未来美国地质碳储存项目中的作用
地质碳封存(GCS)作为碳捕获、利用和封存(CCUS)项目的一个可行组成部分,正在全球范围内加速发展,旨在减少温室污染,限制气候变化。地质碳封存可能是地球物理学应用于储层特征描述和监测的一个发展机遇。联邦政府和州政府的财政激励措施是美国 CCUS 业务的经济动力,最近这些激励措施的增加引发了大量美国环境保护局第六类许可申请,以注入二氧化碳进行 GCS。这些申请表明,几乎所有此类项目都建议使用地球物理技术进行监测。我们根据对最近提交的 VI 类许可申请的深入分析,评估了美国的 GCS 地球物理市场。分析表明,在注入二氧化碳之前,对现有地震数据进行再处理将是确定储层特征的主要地球物理活动。对于二氧化碳注入的监测、验证和记录,延时垂直地震剖面和三维地震成像将是主要技术,其次是二维延时地震成像和一些非地震方法。计划对大多数 CCUS 项目进行被动地震监测,以降低诱发地震的风险。如果美国在 2050 年前实现当前气候目标的假设得以实现,那么地球物理活动将在未来 30 年内增加。对支持这些项目所需的地震工作人员数量的估算表明,到 2050 年,与全球大陆架系统相关的地震采集规模可能会达到美国陆上石油和天然气地球物理工作人员的现有水平。虽然由法规驱动的市场经济激励机制将促使全球地质监视系统中的地球物理探测工作降到最低,但随着先进的处理和分析工具、多物理场数据解释以及具有成本效益的连续监测技术的发展,地球物理活动也有可能增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Steckman Ridge: A naturally fractured underground gas storage field SEG Summer Field Camp: Multigeophysical imaging of an aquifer in the Astara region of Azerbaijan IMAGE Preview: Experience the geosciences around the world at IMAGE '24 Introduction to this special section: General submissions Seismic modeling using pseudo-impedance derived from physical models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1