Validity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

IF 1.4 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE EJVES Vascular Forum Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.02.003
Emilia Stegemann , Jana Larbig , Berthold Stegemann , Irene Portig , Hans Prescher , Thomas Bürger
{"title":"Validity of Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Arterial Thoracic Outlet Syndrome","authors":"Emilia Stegemann ,&nbsp;Jana Larbig ,&nbsp;Berthold Stegemann ,&nbsp;Irene Portig ,&nbsp;Hans Prescher ,&nbsp;Thomas Bürger","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare disorder mostly seen in younger individuals. Although patient wellbeing is relevantly impaired, it often takes a long time before the diagnosis is made. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is routinely used despite its radiation exposure, which is a major concern in this young patient population. Moreover, DSA offers limited opportunities for functional assessment. By contrast, ultrasonography is widely accessible without causing radiation exposure and allows for flexible functional assessment. The main goal of the study was to investigate whether ultrasound (US) was a viable alternative to DSA in diagnosing arterial TOS (aTOS).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients, referred to a tertiary centre for evaluation of suspected TOS, were recruited into the study. DSA was routinely performed with the patient's arms both in the raised (abducted) and neutral (adducted) position. Two vascular surgeons and two radiologists assessed the resulting images for the presence of aTOS. Additionally, two examiners performed US according to a standardised protocol. The reference for presence of aTOS was the DSA based interdisciplinary vascular conference consensus. Inter-rater agreement and latent class analysis (LCA) were performed between assessors and diagnostic methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Fifty one consecutive patients (two thirds female) aged 39.3 ± 13.0 years were included within 11 months. US agreement was excellent at 0.94 (0.841–0.980), DSA agreement for vascular surgeons was good at 0.779 (0.479–1.000), whereas it was moderate at 0.546 (0.046–1.000) for radiologists. Results suggest that DSA is untenable as the gold standard for aTOS diagnosis. In LCA, US was shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of aTOS.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>US examination is a valid test for the detection of haemodynamically relevant compression of arteries in the diagnostic work up of aTOS using a standardised protocol. The role of DSA as the gold standard should be reviewed and needs to be reconsidered.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36502,"journal":{"name":"EJVES Vascular Forum","volume":"61 ","pages":"Pages 92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24000741/pdfft?md5=4a8589826fa1be077c2e2cf259161e9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2666688X24000741-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJVES Vascular Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666688X24000741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is a rare disorder mostly seen in younger individuals. Although patient wellbeing is relevantly impaired, it often takes a long time before the diagnosis is made. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is routinely used despite its radiation exposure, which is a major concern in this young patient population. Moreover, DSA offers limited opportunities for functional assessment. By contrast, ultrasonography is widely accessible without causing radiation exposure and allows for flexible functional assessment. The main goal of the study was to investigate whether ultrasound (US) was a viable alternative to DSA in diagnosing arterial TOS (aTOS).

Methods

Patients, referred to a tertiary centre for evaluation of suspected TOS, were recruited into the study. DSA was routinely performed with the patient's arms both in the raised (abducted) and neutral (adducted) position. Two vascular surgeons and two radiologists assessed the resulting images for the presence of aTOS. Additionally, two examiners performed US according to a standardised protocol. The reference for presence of aTOS was the DSA based interdisciplinary vascular conference consensus. Inter-rater agreement and latent class analysis (LCA) were performed between assessors and diagnostic methods.

Results

Fifty one consecutive patients (two thirds female) aged 39.3 ± 13.0 years were included within 11 months. US agreement was excellent at 0.94 (0.841–0.980), DSA agreement for vascular surgeons was good at 0.779 (0.479–1.000), whereas it was moderate at 0.546 (0.046–1.000) for radiologists. Results suggest that DSA is untenable as the gold standard for aTOS diagnosis. In LCA, US was shown to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the detection of aTOS.

Conclusion

US examination is a valid test for the detection of haemodynamically relevant compression of arteries in the diagnostic work up of aTOS using a standardised protocol. The role of DSA as the gold standard should be reviewed and needs to be reconsidered.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波诊断胸廓出口动脉综合征的有效性
目的胸廓出口综合征(TOS)是一种罕见的疾病,多见于年轻人。虽然患者的健康会受到相关损害,但往往需要很长时间才能确诊。数字减影血管造影术(DSA)尽管会产生辐射,但仍被常规使用,这对年轻患者来说是一个主要问题。此外,DSA 提供的功能评估机会有限。相比之下,超声波造影术可广泛使用,且不会造成辐射,还能灵活地进行功能评估。该研究的主要目的是调查超声波(US)是否可以替代 DSA 诊断动脉 TOS(aTOS)。DSA常规在患者双臂上举(外展)和中立(内收)位时进行。两名血管外科医生和两名放射科医生对所得图像进行评估,以确定是否存在 TOS。此外,两名检查人员还根据标准化方案进行了 US 检查。是否存在 aTOS 的参考依据是基于跨学科血管会议共识的 DSA。在 11 个月内连续纳入了 51 名患者(三分之二为女性),年龄为 39.3 ± 13.0 岁。US 一致性极佳,为 0.94 (0.841-0.980),血管外科医生的 DSA 一致性良好,为 0.779 (0.479-1.000),而放射科医生的 DSA 一致性一般,为 0.546 (0.046-1.000)。结果表明,DSA 作为 aTOS 诊断的金标准是站不住脚的。在 LCA 中,US 被证明是检测 aTOS 的可靠诊断工具。DSA作为金标准的作用应该重新审视,需要重新考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EJVES Vascular Forum
EJVES Vascular Forum Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
102 days
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Board Editorial Board Immediate Carotid Artery Stenting or Deferred Treatment in Patients With Tandem Carotid Lesions Treated Endovascularly for Acute Ischaemic Stroke Critical Limb Ischaemia in Octogenarians: Treatment Outcomes Compared With Younger Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1