Registration system reform and initial public offering ownership preference: Evidence from China

IF 1.9 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE China Journal of Accounting Research Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100343
Xihao Wu, Di Zhang, Zhongxin Wu
{"title":"Registration system reform and initial public offering ownership preference: Evidence from China","authors":"Xihao Wu,&nbsp;Di Zhang,&nbsp;Zhongxin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether registration system reform (RSR) can curb administrative intervention and create a fair market environment has long been a concern in China. We explore this issue from the perspective of the initial public offering (IPO) preference based on the entropy balancing method, and findings are as follows. First, an IPO ownership preference exists under approval system. That is, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely than private enterprises to obtain IPO approval. However, RSR significantly changes this preference, especially for non-politically connected private enterprises. Second, the post-IPO market performance of SOEs is inferior to that of private enterprises under approval system, thus excluding the view that approval is prioritized for SOEs because of superior performance. Third, compared with SOEs, private enterprises are more likely to switch the issuance system from approval system to registration system; this change makes it easier for them to obtain IPO approval, indicating that private enterprise owners perceive the registration channel to be fairer. Fourth, the effect of RSR on IPO ownership preference mainly occurs in companies in three major urban agglomerations in China—the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region—and in technology-intensive industries. Collectively, our findings reveal that RSR cultivates a fairer IPO approval process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 100343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000017/pdfft?md5=206ee3a0142a6dcb11181209ef4c1871&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whether registration system reform (RSR) can curb administrative intervention and create a fair market environment has long been a concern in China. We explore this issue from the perspective of the initial public offering (IPO) preference based on the entropy balancing method, and findings are as follows. First, an IPO ownership preference exists under approval system. That is, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely than private enterprises to obtain IPO approval. However, RSR significantly changes this preference, especially for non-politically connected private enterprises. Second, the post-IPO market performance of SOEs is inferior to that of private enterprises under approval system, thus excluding the view that approval is prioritized for SOEs because of superior performance. Third, compared with SOEs, private enterprises are more likely to switch the issuance system from approval system to registration system; this change makes it easier for them to obtain IPO approval, indicating that private enterprise owners perceive the registration channel to be fairer. Fourth, the effect of RSR on IPO ownership preference mainly occurs in companies in three major urban agglomerations in China—the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region—and in technology-intensive industries. Collectively, our findings reveal that RSR cultivates a fairer IPO approval process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注册制改革与首次公开募股所有权偏好:来自中国的证据
注册制改革(RSR)能否抑制行政干预、创造公平的市场环境一直是中国关注的焦点。我们基于熵平衡法,从首次公开发行(IPO)偏好的角度对这一问题进行了探讨,结论如下。首先,审批制下存在 IPO 所有权偏好。也就是说,国有企业比私营企业更有可能获得 IPO 批准。然而,RSR 显著改变了这种偏好,尤其是对非政治性关联的私营企业而言。其次,在核准制下,国有企业上市后的市场表现不如民营企业,因此排除了国有企业因业绩优异而优先获得核准的观点。第三,与国有企业相比,民营企业更倾向于将发行制度从核准制转为注册制,这种转变使民营企业更容易获得 IPO 审批,表明民营企业主认为注册制渠道更为公平。第四,注册制对 IPO 所有权偏好的影响主要发生在中国三大城市群--珠江三角洲、长江三角洲和京津冀地区的企业,以及技术密集型行业。总之,我们的研究结果表明,RSR 促进了 IPO 审批过程的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
295
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Coping strategy of independent directors for job-fulfillment risk under different ownership types and enforced legal environments How does digital transformation affect corporate accounting employees? ESG performance and cost of debt Personal data security and stock crash risk: Evidence from China’s Cybersecurity Law
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1