{"title":"Registration system reform and initial public offering ownership preference: Evidence from China","authors":"Xihao Wu, Di Zhang, Zhongxin Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.cjar.2024.100343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether registration system reform (RSR) can curb administrative intervention and create a fair market environment has long been a concern in China. We explore this issue from the perspective of the initial public offering (IPO) preference based on the entropy balancing method, and findings are as follows. First, an IPO ownership preference exists under approval system. That is, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely than private enterprises to obtain IPO approval. However, RSR significantly changes this preference, especially for non-politically connected private enterprises. Second, the post-IPO market performance of SOEs is inferior to that of private enterprises under approval system, thus excluding the view that approval is prioritized for SOEs because of superior performance. Third, compared with SOEs, private enterprises are more likely to switch the issuance system from approval system to registration system; this change makes it easier for them to obtain IPO approval, indicating that private enterprise owners perceive the registration channel to be fairer. Fourth, the effect of RSR on IPO ownership preference mainly occurs in companies in three major urban agglomerations in China—the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region—and in technology-intensive industries. Collectively, our findings reveal that RSR cultivates a fairer IPO approval process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45688,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Accounting Research","volume":"17 1","pages":"Article 100343"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000017/pdfft?md5=206ee3a0142a6dcb11181209ef4c1871&pid=1-s2.0-S1755309124000017-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Accounting Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755309124000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Whether registration system reform (RSR) can curb administrative intervention and create a fair market environment has long been a concern in China. We explore this issue from the perspective of the initial public offering (IPO) preference based on the entropy balancing method, and findings are as follows. First, an IPO ownership preference exists under approval system. That is, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are more likely than private enterprises to obtain IPO approval. However, RSR significantly changes this preference, especially for non-politically connected private enterprises. Second, the post-IPO market performance of SOEs is inferior to that of private enterprises under approval system, thus excluding the view that approval is prioritized for SOEs because of superior performance. Third, compared with SOEs, private enterprises are more likely to switch the issuance system from approval system to registration system; this change makes it easier for them to obtain IPO approval, indicating that private enterprise owners perceive the registration channel to be fairer. Fourth, the effect of RSR on IPO ownership preference mainly occurs in companies in three major urban agglomerations in China—the Pearl River Delta, the Yangtze River Delta, and the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei region—and in technology-intensive industries. Collectively, our findings reveal that RSR cultivates a fairer IPO approval process.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the China Journal of Accounting Research is to publish theoretical and empirical research papers that use contemporary research methodologies to investigate issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance in the Greater China region, countries related to the Belt and Road Initiative, and other emerging and developed markets. The Journal encourages the applications of economic and sociological theories to analyze and explain accounting issues within the legal and institutional framework, and to explore accounting issues under different capital markets accurately and succinctly. The published research articles of the Journal will enable scholars to extract relevant issues about accounting, corporate finance, auditing and corporate governance related to the capital markets and institutional environment.