COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A survey of unvaccinated adults

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health SA Gesondheid Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2468
T. Gengiah, Donavan C. Naidoo, Nomcebo Maduma, Saien Govender, Sherishka Dhindayal, Lara Lewis
{"title":"COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A survey of unvaccinated adults","authors":"T. Gengiah, Donavan C. Naidoo, Nomcebo Maduma, Saien Govender, Sherishka Dhindayal, Lara Lewis","doi":"10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Concerns and misconceptions surrounding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may account for vaccine hesitancy and low uptake.Aim: To determine prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, vaccine-related misconceptions, and predictors of vaccine hesitancy among South Africans.Setting: Community setting in five districts in KwaZulu- Natal province.Methods: Between August 20, 2021, and September 27, 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey, interviewing 300 unvaccinated adults amid the national vaccination campaign. Predictors of hesitancy were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: Participants had a median age of 29 years (IQR: 23–39), 86.7% were Black African, 63.2% were male, 53.3% resided in rural communities, and 59.3% (95% CI: 53.8% – 64.9%) were classified as vaccine hesitant. The primary reason for not vaccinating was a lack of trust in the vaccine (62.1%). Factors associated with reduced vaccine hesitancy included age (participants aged 35–49 years: OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18–0.64, p = 0.003; participants over 50 years: OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.47, p = 0.0004), previous COVID-19 infection (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.87, p = 0.03), and receiving vaccine information from healthcare workers (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.10–1.0, p = 0.05). Unemployed (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.1–4.2, p = 0.03) and self-employed individuals (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.27–7.02, p = 0.01) were more likely to be vaccine hesitant.Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rates are high in KwaZulu-Natal. Uptake could be enhanced by healthcare workers leading information campaigns with messages targeting younger individuals, the unemployed, and the self-employed.Contribution: This survey provides evidence to improve COVID-19 vaccination uptake in South Africa.","PeriodicalId":45721,"journal":{"name":"Health SA Gesondheid","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health SA Gesondheid","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/hsag.v29i0.2468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Concerns and misconceptions surrounding coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines may account for vaccine hesitancy and low uptake.Aim: To determine prevalence of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, vaccine-related misconceptions, and predictors of vaccine hesitancy among South Africans.Setting: Community setting in five districts in KwaZulu- Natal province.Methods: Between August 20, 2021, and September 27, 2021, we conducted a cross-sectional survey, interviewing 300 unvaccinated adults amid the national vaccination campaign. Predictors of hesitancy were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis.Results: Participants had a median age of 29 years (IQR: 23–39), 86.7% were Black African, 63.2% were male, 53.3% resided in rural communities, and 59.3% (95% CI: 53.8% – 64.9%) were classified as vaccine hesitant. The primary reason for not vaccinating was a lack of trust in the vaccine (62.1%). Factors associated with reduced vaccine hesitancy included age (participants aged 35–49 years: OR: 0.28, 95% CI: 0.18–0.64, p = 0.003; participants over 50 years: OR: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.07–0.47, p = 0.0004), previous COVID-19 infection (OR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11–0.87, p = 0.03), and receiving vaccine information from healthcare workers (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.10–1.0, p = 0.05). Unemployed (OR: 2.14, 95% CI: 1.1–4.2, p = 0.03) and self-employed individuals (OR: 2.98, 95% CI: 1.27–7.02, p = 0.01) were more likely to be vaccine hesitant.Conclusion: COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy rates are high in KwaZulu-Natal. Uptake could be enhanced by healthcare workers leading information campaigns with messages targeting younger individuals, the unemployed, and the self-employed.Contribution: This survey provides evidence to improve COVID-19 vaccination uptake in South Africa.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫态度:对未接种疫苗成年人的调查
背景:目的:确定南非人对2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)疫苗犹豫不决的普遍程度、与疫苗相关的误解以及疫苗犹豫不决的预测因素:环境:夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省五个地区的社区环境:2021年8月20日至2021年9月27日期间,我们进行了一次横断面调查,在全国疫苗接种活动中采访了300名未接种疫苗的成年人。通过多变量逻辑回归分析确定了犹豫不决的预测因素:参与者的年龄中位数为 29 岁(IQR:23-39),86.7% 为非洲黑人,63.2% 为男性,53.3% 居住在农村社区,59.3%(95% CI:53.8% - 64.9%)被归类为疫苗犹豫不决者。不接种的主要原因是对疫苗缺乏信任(62.1%)。与疫苗接种犹豫减少相关的因素包括年龄(35-49 岁的参与者:OR:0.28,95% CI:0.18-0.64,p = 0.003;50 岁以上的参与者:OR:0.18,95% CI:0.07-0.47,p = 0.0004),曾感染 COVID-19(OR:0.31,95% CI:0.11-0.87,p = 0.03),从医护人员处获得疫苗信息(OR:0.32,95% CI:0.10-1.0,p = 0.05)。失业者(OR:2.14,95% CI:1.1-4.2,p = 0.03)和自营职业者(OR:2.98,95% CI:1.27-7.02,p = 0.01)更有可能对疫苗犹豫不决:结论:COVID-19疫苗在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的犹豫率很高。医护人员可以针对年轻人、失业者和自营职业者开展宣传活动,从而提高疫苗的接种率:贡献:这项调查为提高南非的 COVID-19 疫苗接种率提供了证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health SA Gesondheid
Health SA Gesondheid HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
77
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges related to the implementation of the CCMDD programme in Sekhukhune clinics. Perceptions of the MDT towards the health needs and support for grandparents caring for AIDS orphans. Professional nurses' perspectives of an ideal performance management process. Adolescent girls' sexual and reproductive health information needs and barriers in Cape Town. Experiences of nurses studying towards post-basic qualifications during COVID-19 in KwaZulu-Natal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1