Impact of Race on Classification of Atherosclerotic Risk Using a National Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Tool

Jarett R. Beaudoin MD, MPH , Jill Curran MS , G. Caleb Alexander MD, MS
{"title":"Impact of Race on Classification of Atherosclerotic Risk Using a National Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Tool","authors":"Jarett R. Beaudoin MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Jill Curran MS ,&nbsp;G. Caleb Alexander MD, MS","doi":"10.1016/j.focus.2024.100200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The use of race in clinical risk prediction tools may exacerbate racial disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. This study quantified the number of individuals reclassified for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease owing to a change in their race alone on the basis of a commonly used risk prediction tool.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This is a cross-sectional analysis of individuals aged 40–75 years without a history of cardiovascular events, diabetes, or other high-risk features using the 2005–2018 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. Authors compared atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk scores using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology equation recommended for White individuals or individuals of other races with that recommended for Black individuals.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 2,946 White individuals; 1,361 Black individuals; and 2,495 individuals of other races were included in the analysis. Using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology equation, the mean 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk was 5.80% (95% CI=5.54, 6.06) for White individuals, 7.04% (956% CI=6.69, 7.39) for Black individuals, and 4.93% (95% CI=4.61, 5.24) for individuals of other races. When using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology equation designated for the opposite race (White/other race versus Black), the mean atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score increased by 1.02% (95% CI=0.90, 1.13) for White individuals, decreased by 1.82% (95% CI= −1.67, −1.96) for Black individuals, and increased by 0.98% (95% CI=0.85, 1.10) for individuals of other races. When using clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease categories of &lt;7.5%, 7.5%–10%, and &gt;10%, 16.93% of all individuals were reclassified when using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology's equation designated for the opposite race.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Changing race within a commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction tool results in significant changes in risk classification among eligible White and Black individuals in the U.S.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72142,"journal":{"name":"AJPM focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000191/pdfft?md5=4d12b2f671069d41da5a93e6b075e7be&pid=1-s2.0-S2773065424000191-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJPM focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773065424000191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The use of race in clinical risk prediction tools may exacerbate racial disparities in healthcare access and outcomes. This study quantified the number of individuals reclassified for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease owing to a change in their race alone on the basis of a commonly used risk prediction tool.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional analysis of individuals aged 40–75 years without a history of cardiovascular events, diabetes, or other high-risk features using the 2005–2018 National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey. Authors compared atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk scores using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology equation recommended for White individuals or individuals of other races with that recommended for Black individuals.

Results

A total of 2,946 White individuals; 1,361 Black individuals; and 2,495 individuals of other races were included in the analysis. Using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology equation, the mean 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk was 5.80% (95% CI=5.54, 6.06) for White individuals, 7.04% (956% CI=6.69, 7.39) for Black individuals, and 4.93% (95% CI=4.61, 5.24) for individuals of other races. When using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology equation designated for the opposite race (White/other race versus Black), the mean atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score increased by 1.02% (95% CI=0.90, 1.13) for White individuals, decreased by 1.82% (95% CI= −1.67, −1.96) for Black individuals, and increased by 0.98% (95% CI=0.85, 1.10) for individuals of other races. When using clinical atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease categories of <7.5%, 7.5%–10%, and >10%, 16.93% of all individuals were reclassified when using the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology's equation designated for the opposite race.

Conclusions

Changing race within a commonly used cardiovascular risk prediction tool results in significant changes in risk classification among eligible White and Black individuals in the U.S.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种族对使用国家心血管风险预测工具进行动脉粥样硬化风险分类的影响
导言:在临床风险预测工具中使用种族可能会加剧医疗服务和结果中的种族差异。这项研究量化了在常用风险预测工具的基础上,仅因种族的改变而被重新划分为心血管疾病一级预防对象的人数。方法这是一项横断面分析,研究对象是年龄在 40-75 岁之间、无心血管事件史、糖尿病史或其他高风险特征的人,采用的是 2005-2018 年全国健康与营养调查。作者使用美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会推荐的白人或其他种族人群动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评分公式,与推荐的黑人动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险评分公式进行了比较。结果 共有 2,946 名白人、1,361 名黑人和 2,495 名其他种族人群纳入分析。使用美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会公式计算,白人 10 年平均动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险为 5.80% (95% CI=5.54, 6.06),黑人为 7.04% (956% CI=6.69, 7.39),其他种族为 4.93% (95% CI=4.61, 5.24)。如果使用美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会为相反种族(白人/其他种族与黑人)指定的公式,白人的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险平均值增加了 1.02% (95% CI=0.90, 1.13),黑人减少了 1.82% (95% CI= -1.67, -1.96) ,其他种族的人增加了 0.98% (95% CI=0.85, 1.10)。在使用美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会为相反种族指定的公式时,当使用临床动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病类别为<7.5%、7.5%-10%和>10%时,16.93%的人被重新分类。结论在常用的心血管风险预测工具中改变种族会导致美国符合条件的白人和黑人的风险分类发生显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJPM focus
AJPM focus Health, Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board and Journal Information Work-Related Factors Associated With Psychological Distress Among Grocery Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic Lifestyle Differences in the Metabolic Comorbidity Score of Adult Population From South Asian Countries: A Cross-Sectional Study Corrigendum: Associations of Historical Redlining With BMI and Waist Circumference in Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Physicians’ Self-Reported Knowledge and Behaviors Related to Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and Diagnosing Opioid Use Disorder, DocStyles, 2020
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1