Parameterization of Height–Diameter and Crown Radius–Diameter Relationships Across the Globe

Xiang Song, Jinxu Li, Xiaodong Zeng
{"title":"Parameterization of Height–Diameter and Crown Radius–Diameter Relationships Across the Globe","authors":"Xiang Song, Jinxu Li, Xiaodong Zeng","doi":"10.1093/jpe/rtae005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The tree height–diameter at breast height (H–DBH) and crown radius–DBH (CR–DBH) relationships are key for forest carbon/biomass estimation, parameterization in vegetation models and vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Although the H–DBH relationship has been widely investigated on site or regional scales, and a small amount of studies have involved CR–DBH relationships based on plot-level data, few studies have quantitatively verified the universality of these two relationships on a global scale. Accordingly, this study first evaluated the ability of 29 functions to fit the H–DBH and CR–DBH relationships for six different plant functional types (PFTs) on a global scale, based on a global plant trait database. Results showed that most functions were able to capture the H–DBH relationship for tropical PFTs and boreal needleleaf trees relatively accurately, but slightly less so for temperate PFTs and boreal broadleaf trees. For boreal PFTs, the S-shaped Logistic function fitted the H–DBH relationship best, while for temperate PFTs the Chapman–Richards function performed well. For tropical needleleaf trees, the fractional function of DBH could satisfactorily capture the H–DBH relationship, while for tropical broadleaf trees, the Weibull function and a composite function of fractions were the best choices. For CR–DBH, the fitting capabilities of all the functions were comparable for all PFTs except boreal broadleaf trees. The Logistic function performed best for two boreal PFTs and temperate broadleaf trees, but for temperate needleleaf trees and two tropical PFTs, some exponential functions demonstrated higher skill. This work provides a valuable foundation for parameterization improvements in vegetation models, and some clues to forest field investigations.","PeriodicalId":503671,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Ecology","volume":"1 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpe/rtae005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The tree height–diameter at breast height (H–DBH) and crown radius–DBH (CR–DBH) relationships are key for forest carbon/biomass estimation, parameterization in vegetation models and vegetation–atmosphere interactions. Although the H–DBH relationship has been widely investigated on site or regional scales, and a small amount of studies have involved CR–DBH relationships based on plot-level data, few studies have quantitatively verified the universality of these two relationships on a global scale. Accordingly, this study first evaluated the ability of 29 functions to fit the H–DBH and CR–DBH relationships for six different plant functional types (PFTs) on a global scale, based on a global plant trait database. Results showed that most functions were able to capture the H–DBH relationship for tropical PFTs and boreal needleleaf trees relatively accurately, but slightly less so for temperate PFTs and boreal broadleaf trees. For boreal PFTs, the S-shaped Logistic function fitted the H–DBH relationship best, while for temperate PFTs the Chapman–Richards function performed well. For tropical needleleaf trees, the fractional function of DBH could satisfactorily capture the H–DBH relationship, while for tropical broadleaf trees, the Weibull function and a composite function of fractions were the best choices. For CR–DBH, the fitting capabilities of all the functions were comparable for all PFTs except boreal broadleaf trees. The Logistic function performed best for two boreal PFTs and temperate broadleaf trees, but for temperate needleleaf trees and two tropical PFTs, some exponential functions demonstrated higher skill. This work provides a valuable foundation for parameterization improvements in vegetation models, and some clues to forest field investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球高度-直径和树冠半径-直径关系的参数化
树高-胸径(H-DBH)和树冠半径-DBH(CR-DBH)关系是森林碳/生物量估算、植被模型参数化以及植被-大气相互作用的关键。虽然 H-DBH 关系已在地点或区域尺度上得到广泛研究,也有少量研究涉及基于地块级数据的 CR-DBH 关系,但很少有研究在全球尺度上定量验证这两种关系的普遍性。因此,本研究以全球植物性状数据库为基础,首先评估了 29 个函数在全球范围内拟合六种不同植物功能类型(PFTs)的 H-DBH 和 CR-DBH 关系的能力。结果表明,大多数函数都能相对准确地捕捉热带植物功能类型和北方针叶树的 H-DBH 关系,但温带植物功能类型和北方阔叶树的 H-DBH 关系则稍差。对于北方针叶树,S 型 Logistic 函数最适合 H-DBH 关系,而对于温带针叶树,Chapman-Richards 函数表现良好。对于热带针叶树,DBH 的分数函数可以令人满意地捕捉 H-DBH 关系,而对于热带阔叶树,Weibull 函数和分数的复合函数是最佳选择。对于 CR-DBH,除北方阔叶树外,所有 PFT 的所有函数的拟合能力都相当。Logistic 函数对两种北方阔叶树和温带阔叶树的拟合效果最好,但对于温带针叶树和两种热带阔叶树,一些指数函数的拟合效果更好。这项工作为改进植被模型的参数化提供了宝贵的基础,并为森林实地调查提供了一些线索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Manipulated Microtopography Alters Plant Community Development in Fragile Farm-Pastoral Transition Zone Increasing biochar diversity promotes impacts of plant diversity on remediating cadmium in the soil Effects of leguminous green manure-crop rotation on soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry Sex-specific phosphorus (P)-use and -acquisition in dioecious Populus euphratica as affected by soil moisture levels Differential phenological responses to temperature among different stages of spring vegetation green-up
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1