World-making technology entangled with coloniality, race and gender: Ecomodernist and degrowth perspectives

IF 2.2 2区 哲学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environmental Values Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1177/09632719231209741
Susan Paulson
{"title":"World-making technology entangled with coloniality, race and gender: Ecomodernist and degrowth perspectives","authors":"Susan Paulson","doi":"10.1177/09632719231209741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impelled by the intertwined expansion of capitalist institutions and fossil-fueled industry, human activity has made devastating impacts on ecosystems and earth systems. The colonial, class, racial, and gender systems that coevolved with these historical processes have long been critiqued for engineering exploitation and inequality. Yet the technologies with which these systems interact are widely portrayed as neutral and nonpartisan. This paper interrogates the purported independence of technology on two fronts. First, it uses a political ecology lens to illuminate some ways in which the generation and application of technology have been historically entangled with colonial, racial, and gender systems. Second, it considers how those entanglements have been variously obscured, acknowledged, depoliticized, and/or politicized in two realms of thought and practice: ecomodernism and degrowth. Conclusions call for bringing creative innovation of ecomodernism together with degrowth commitment to just social–ecological transformation.","PeriodicalId":47200,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Values","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Values","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09632719231209741","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Impelled by the intertwined expansion of capitalist institutions and fossil-fueled industry, human activity has made devastating impacts on ecosystems and earth systems. The colonial, class, racial, and gender systems that coevolved with these historical processes have long been critiqued for engineering exploitation and inequality. Yet the technologies with which these systems interact are widely portrayed as neutral and nonpartisan. This paper interrogates the purported independence of technology on two fronts. First, it uses a political ecology lens to illuminate some ways in which the generation and application of technology have been historically entangled with colonial, racial, and gender systems. Second, it considers how those entanglements have been variously obscured, acknowledged, depoliticized, and/or politicized in two realms of thought and practice: ecomodernism and degrowth. Conclusions call for bringing creative innovation of ecomodernism together with degrowth commitment to just social–ecological transformation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
与殖民主义、种族和性别纠缠在一起的创造世界的技术:生态现代主义和脱增长视角
在资本主义制度和化石燃料工业相互交织的扩张推动下,人类活动对生态系统和地球系统造成了破坏性影响。长期以来,与这些历史进程共同发展的殖民、阶级、种族和性别制度一直受到批评,被认为是剥削和不平等的产物。然而,与这些系统相互作用的技术却被广泛描绘成中立和无党派的。本文从两个方面对所谓的技术独立性进行了质疑。首先,它使用政治生态学的视角来揭示技术的产生和应用在历史上与殖民、种族和性别体系纠缠在一起的一些方式。其次,它考虑了这些纠葛如何在两个思想和实践领域中被不同程度地掩盖、承认、非政治化和/或政治化,这两个领域就是:生态现代主义(ecomodernism)和去增长(degrowth)。结论呼吁将生态现代主义的创造性创新与脱增长承诺结合起来,以实现公正的社会生态转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
36.40%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Environmental Values is an international peer-reviewed journal that brings together contributions from philosophy, economics, politics, sociology, geography, anthropology, ecology and other disciplines, which relate to the present and future environment of human beings and other species. In doing so we aim to clarify the relationship between practical policy issues and more fundamental underlying principles or assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Disrupted coping and skills for sustainability: A pluralist Heideggerian perspective Environmental orientations at work: Scientific and embodied environmental knowledge Introducing geological wonder: Planetary thinking as a disruption of narcissism Book Review: Ecological Justice and the Extinction Crisis: Giving Living Beings their Due Michael Hammond: An appreciation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1