A97 INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENT AND STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY ROTATION

N. K. Klemm, S. Jayakumar
{"title":"A97 INTERNAL MEDICINE RESIDENT AND STAFF PERCEPTIONS OF GASTROENTEROLOGY ROTATION","authors":"N. K. Klemm, S. Jayakumar","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The choice of subspecialty by internal medicine residents is partially influenced by their experience with that service. Challenges exist between internal medicine and the high acuity, procedurally-heavy, gastroenterology (GI) service. Negative perceptions may limit the number of residents rotating through a gastroenterology elective, impacting knowledge and comfort managing common GI conditions. Aims To identify misperceptions of the GI service at a tertiary hospital, and evaluate resident and new staff comfort in managing common GI conditions. Methods Twenty-question survey sent to internal medicine residents during 2022-2023 and 13-question survey sent to staff that completed training from 2020-2022; both anonymous, and using Qualtrics software. Results The survey was completed by 18% (30/166) of residents and 20% (13/65) of staff. Most staff (62%) practiced in a community setting. Both cohorts cited overnight cross-coverage consults during (56%) and negative word-of mouth (38%), as reasons they avoided a GI elective. Most participants reported a little (33%) or moderate (47%) amount of GI teaching on medicine service and were unaware of formal lectures (79%) during a GI rotation. Residents and staff were most comfortable managing pancreatitis (98%) and ALF (74%). Staff wished for more experience managing pancreatic and liver masses and outpatient IBD flares; however both groups (86%) were unaware of the ambulatory week during the GI rotation. Conclusions Misperception and unawareness of a GI elective persist amongst internal medicine residents and has implications for new staff managing GI conditions. This study has led to action items that address these concerns. Table 1: Resident & staff awareness, perceptions & knowledge of GI Resident Staff Reasons for not completing a GI rotation n=30 (%) n=9 (%) I had adequate experience completing GI consults overnight as Cross-Coverage 15 (50) 7 (78) GI service was too busy during the day 10 (33) 1 (11) I heard from other residents that is was not a good rotation 10 (33) 5 (56) I had not had a good experience with GI when on medicine service 7 (23) 2 (22) Aware of ambulatory week n=30 (%) n=12 (%) No 25 (83) 11 (92) Aware of formal lectures n=30 (%) n=12 (%) No 24 (80) 9 (75) Amount of teaching on GI conditions during medicine service n=30 (%) n=13 (%) None at all 2 (7) 0 A little 12 (40) 2 (15) A moderate amount 10 (33) 10 (77) A lot 6 (20) 0 A great deal 0 1 (8) During my first year as staff, I felt residency prepared me to manage the following GI issues n=13 (%) ALF or ACLF 11 (84) Liver Mass 5 (38) IBD flare - inpatient 3 (23) IBD flare - outpatient 0 Pancreatic mass 6 (46) Pancreatitis & complications 11 (84) Funding Agencies None","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"222 ","pages":"69 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The choice of subspecialty by internal medicine residents is partially influenced by their experience with that service. Challenges exist between internal medicine and the high acuity, procedurally-heavy, gastroenterology (GI) service. Negative perceptions may limit the number of residents rotating through a gastroenterology elective, impacting knowledge and comfort managing common GI conditions. Aims To identify misperceptions of the GI service at a tertiary hospital, and evaluate resident and new staff comfort in managing common GI conditions. Methods Twenty-question survey sent to internal medicine residents during 2022-2023 and 13-question survey sent to staff that completed training from 2020-2022; both anonymous, and using Qualtrics software. Results The survey was completed by 18% (30/166) of residents and 20% (13/65) of staff. Most staff (62%) practiced in a community setting. Both cohorts cited overnight cross-coverage consults during (56%) and negative word-of mouth (38%), as reasons they avoided a GI elective. Most participants reported a little (33%) or moderate (47%) amount of GI teaching on medicine service and were unaware of formal lectures (79%) during a GI rotation. Residents and staff were most comfortable managing pancreatitis (98%) and ALF (74%). Staff wished for more experience managing pancreatic and liver masses and outpatient IBD flares; however both groups (86%) were unaware of the ambulatory week during the GI rotation. Conclusions Misperception and unawareness of a GI elective persist amongst internal medicine residents and has implications for new staff managing GI conditions. This study has led to action items that address these concerns. Table 1: Resident & staff awareness, perceptions & knowledge of GI Resident Staff Reasons for not completing a GI rotation n=30 (%) n=9 (%) I had adequate experience completing GI consults overnight as Cross-Coverage 15 (50) 7 (78) GI service was too busy during the day 10 (33) 1 (11) I heard from other residents that is was not a good rotation 10 (33) 5 (56) I had not had a good experience with GI when on medicine service 7 (23) 2 (22) Aware of ambulatory week n=30 (%) n=12 (%) No 25 (83) 11 (92) Aware of formal lectures n=30 (%) n=12 (%) No 24 (80) 9 (75) Amount of teaching on GI conditions during medicine service n=30 (%) n=13 (%) None at all 2 (7) 0 A little 12 (40) 2 (15) A moderate amount 10 (33) 10 (77) A lot 6 (20) 0 A great deal 0 1 (8) During my first year as staff, I felt residency prepared me to manage the following GI issues n=13 (%) ALF or ACLF 11 (84) Liver Mass 5 (38) IBD flare - inpatient 3 (23) IBD flare - outpatient 0 Pancreatic mass 6 (46) Pancreatitis & complications 11 (84) Funding Agencies None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A97 内科住院医师和员工对胃肠病学轮转的看法
摘要 背景 内科住院医师对亚专科的选择部分受其服务经验的影响。内科与急诊量大、程序繁重的胃肠病学(GI)服务之间存在挑战。负面看法可能会限制通过消化内科选修课轮转的住院医师人数,影响他们对常见消化内科疾病的了解和管理舒适度。目的 找出对一家三级医院消化内科服务的误解,并评估住院医师和新员工在处理常见消化内科疾病时的舒适度。方法 对 2022-2023 年期间的内科住院医师进行 20 个问题的调查,对 2020-2022 年期间完成培训的员工进行 13 个问题的调查;调查均采用 Qualtrics 软件匿名进行。结果 18%的住院医师(30/166)和 20%的员工(13/65)完成了调查。大多数员工(62%)在社区环境中工作。两组人都认为,隔夜交叉会诊(56%)和负面口碑(38%)是他们避免选择消化内科手术的原因。大多数参与者表示,他们在医疗服务中接受了少量(33%)或中等量(47%)的消化内科教学,但并不知道在消化内科轮转期间有正式讲座(79%)。住院医师和员工在处理胰腺炎(98%)和 ALF(74%)时最得心应手。工作人员希望获得更多管理胰腺和肝脏肿块以及门诊 IBD 复发的经验;但两组人员(86%)都不知道在消化科轮转期间有门诊周。结论 内科住院医师对消化内科选修课的误解和不了解依然存在,这对管理消化内科疾病的新员工有一定影响。本研究提出了解决这些问题的行动项目。表 1:住院医师和医务人员的认识、表 1:住院医师和医务人员对消化内科的认识、看法和知识 住院医师 医务人员 不完成消化内科轮转的原因 n=30 (%) n=9 (%) 我有足够的经验在一夜之间完成消化内科会诊,作为交叉15 (50) 7 (78) 消化内科服务白天太忙 10 (33) 1 (11) 我听其他住院医师说这不是一个好的轮转 10 (33) 5 (56) 我在内科服务时没有很好的消化内科经验 7 (23) 2 (22) 了解门诊周 n=30 (%) n=12 (%) 否 25 (83) 11(92) 了解正式讲座 n=30 (%) n=12 (%) 否 24 (80) 9 (75) 内科服务期间消化道疾病的教学数量 n=30 (%) n=13 (%) 完全没有 2 (7) 0 少量 12 (40) 2 (15) 适量 10 (33) 10 (77) 大量 6 (20) 0 非常多 0 1 (8) 在我作为员工的第一年、我觉得住院医师培训使我能够处理以下消化道问题 n=13 (%) ALF 或 ACLF 11 (84) 肝包块 5 (38) IBD 爆发--住院病人 3 (23) IBD 爆发--门诊病人 0 胰腺包块 6 (46) 胰腺炎及并发症 11 (84) 资助机构 无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: understanding risk factors and surveillance strategies Identification and prioritization of patient-centred strategies to enhance IBD-related care for older adults: a modified Delphi approach Rectal varices treated by retrograde transvenous obliteration Canadian colorectal cancer screening programs: How do they measure up using the International Agency for Research on Cancer criteria for organized screening? A78 VALIDITY EVIDENCE FOR OBSERVATIONAL EUS COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1