Student Achievement Spectrum: Investigating Pedagogical Diversity and Teacher Methodology Perceptions

Mukaram Azhar, Ms Sumeera, Ghulam Mustafa Shaikh, Muhammad Ilyas, Muhsin Khan, Rabil Hadi
{"title":"Student Achievement Spectrum: Investigating Pedagogical Diversity and Teacher Methodology Perceptions","authors":"Mukaram Azhar, Ms Sumeera, Ghulam Mustafa Shaikh, Muhammad Ilyas, Muhsin Khan, Rabil Hadi","doi":"10.52223/jess.2024.5103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined the relationship between teachers' teaching methods and the academic performance of 150 undergraduate and Master's students from various fields of study. It contains a structural sample strategy to ensure the inclusion of individuals from various fields. A quantitative research methodology was used to administer a structured survey questionnaire, which was designed through a systematic literature review, in order to analyze students' diverse perspectives on teaching methods, academic performance, and demographic information. The independent variables consisted of perceptions of Teaching Methodologies and different pedagogical approaches, whereas the academic performance of students was the dependent variable. The statistical studies performed using SPSS software encompassed descriptive, regression, and factor analyses, revealing the connections between teaching approaches and academic success. The results emphasized the crucial significance of interactive, learner-focused instructional approaches in promoting enhanced academic performance. The active participation of students and the use of diverse teaching methods had a substantial impact on student achievement, emphasizing the importance of flexible instructional strategies. Nevertheless, traditional teacher-centered approaches demonstrated restricted influence. Although this study has limitations in terms of sample size and reliance on self-reported data, it highlights the need for an adaptable educational approach that incorporates evolving teaching methods to improve student outcomes. The research provides useful insights into effective pedagogical methods, advocating for a versatile and learner-centered educational environment. The study highlights the need for a better understanding of teaching methods' impact on academic performance to improve educational outcomes, resource allocation, curriculum development, and policy formulation.","PeriodicalId":507378,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Social Studies","volume":"62 20","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52223/jess.2024.5103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study examined the relationship between teachers' teaching methods and the academic performance of 150 undergraduate and Master's students from various fields of study. It contains a structural sample strategy to ensure the inclusion of individuals from various fields. A quantitative research methodology was used to administer a structured survey questionnaire, which was designed through a systematic literature review, in order to analyze students' diverse perspectives on teaching methods, academic performance, and demographic information. The independent variables consisted of perceptions of Teaching Methodologies and different pedagogical approaches, whereas the academic performance of students was the dependent variable. The statistical studies performed using SPSS software encompassed descriptive, regression, and factor analyses, revealing the connections between teaching approaches and academic success. The results emphasized the crucial significance of interactive, learner-focused instructional approaches in promoting enhanced academic performance. The active participation of students and the use of diverse teaching methods had a substantial impact on student achievement, emphasizing the importance of flexible instructional strategies. Nevertheless, traditional teacher-centered approaches demonstrated restricted influence. Although this study has limitations in terms of sample size and reliance on self-reported data, it highlights the need for an adaptable educational approach that incorporates evolving teaching methods to improve student outcomes. The research provides useful insights into effective pedagogical methods, advocating for a versatile and learner-centered educational environment. The study highlights the need for a better understanding of teaching methods' impact on academic performance to improve educational outcomes, resource allocation, curriculum development, and policy formulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生成绩频谱:调查教学法多样性和教师方法认知
本研究探讨了教师的教学方法与 150 名来自不同研究领域的本科生和硕士生的学习成绩之间的关系。研究采用了结构性样本策略,以确保纳入来自不同领域的个人。研究采用定量研究方法,通过系统的文献回顾设计了一份结构化调查问卷,以分析学生对教学方法、学习成绩和人口统计学信息的不同看法。自变量包括对教学方法和不同教学方法的看法,而学生的学业成绩则是因变量。使用 SPSS 软件进行的统计研究包括描述性分析、回归分析和因素分析,揭示了教学方法与学业成绩之间的联系。研究结果强调了互动式、以学习者为中心的教学方法在促进提高学习成绩方面的重要意义。学生的积极参与和多样化教学方法的使用对学生的学习成绩产生了重大影响,强调了灵活教学策略的重要性。然而,传统的以教师为中心的教学方法的影响有限。虽然这项研究在样本量和依赖自我报告数据方面存在局限性,但它强调了采用不断发展的教学方法来提高学生成绩的适应性教育方法的必要性。研究为有效的教学方法提供了有益的启示,倡导以学习者为中心的多功能教育环境。研究强调,需要更好地了解教学方法对学习成绩的影响,以改善教育成果、资源分配、课程开发和政策制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and the Environmental Degradation in Asian Countries Exploring the Levels of Undergraduate University Students' Study Skills The Impact of ChatGPT on Language Evolution: A Linguistic Analysis Jinnah's Vision for Minorities in Pakistan: A Critical Analysis The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Shaping the Future of Education at Higher Secondary Level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1