A221 AZATHIOPRINE DOSING THRESHOLD IN ANTI-TNF COMBINATION THERAPY FOR MINIMIZING IMMUNOGENICITY AND OPTIMIZING TREATMENT EFFICACY FOR PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE. A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY

N. Alajeel, J. Choi, R. Khanna, A Wilson
{"title":"A221 AZATHIOPRINE DOSING THRESHOLD IN ANTI-TNF COMBINATION THERAPY FOR MINIMIZING IMMUNOGENICITY AND OPTIMIZING TREATMENT EFFICACY FOR PATIENTS WITH INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE. A RETROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY","authors":"N. Alajeel, J. Choi, R. Khanna, A Wilson","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwad061.221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Reported rates of anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation to tumor necrosis factor-a antagonists (anti-TNF) range from 20-75%. One way to reduce the risk of ADA formation is to combine a second immune-suppressing agent such as azathioprine (AZA) with the anti-TNF agent, known as combination therapy. However, it is unknown if the risk of combination therapy, including the additive risk of AZA and anti-TNF side effects, could be reduced by exposing individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to the lowest dose of azathioprine while still maintaining the beneficial effect of ADA prevention. Aims To identify the minimum dose of AZA needed to prevent ADA formation to anti-TNF agents in individuals with IBD receiving combination therapy. We also assessed the occurrence of adverse drug events, treatment loss of response, treatment discontinuation and the need for treatment dose escalation. Methods A retrospective cohort study is ongoing in adult participants with IBDreceiving either infliximab or adalimumab in combination with AZA. Patients are divided based on their AZA dosage (low dose group, AZA ampersand:003C2mg/kg/day versus standard dose group, AZA 2mg/kg/day). All participants will be followed for 1 year and observed for the occurrence of ADA formation, adverse drug events, treatment loss of response, treatment discontinuation and the need for treatment dose escalation. Results To date, 48 participants are currently included (low dose, n=29; standard dose, n=19). 42 are on Infliximab and 6 are on Adalimumab. The occurrence of ADA was 17.4% in the low dose group and 20% in the standard dose group (pampersand:003E0.99). More participants lost response to treatment and discontinued anti-TNF therapy in the standard dose group (n=7/19, 36.8%) versus the low-dose group (n=8/29, 27.6%, p=0.54). More participants in the low-dose group received anti-TNF dose escalation (n= 20/29,68.9%) compared to the standard dose group (n=6/19, 31.6%, p=0.017). Adverse events, to Anti-TNF was seen in (n=3/19, 15.7%) in the standard dose group, in comparison to (n=4/29, 13.79%, pampersand:003E0.99) in the low dose group. Adverse events to AZA were surprisingly higher in the low dose group (n=14/29, 48.3%) while in the standard dose, it was (n=5/19, 26.3%, p=0.14). Conclusions The preliminary result of the study suggests that there is no significant difference in anti-drug antibody formation between standard and low doses of azathioprine in combination with anti-TNF therapy, in addition, data showed significant lower rates of Anti-TNF discontinuation and loss of response to treatment in low Azathioprine dose group. Completion of the study will help further define if low-dose AZA can be used for ADA prevention in anti-TNF combination therapy without compromising important clinical outcomes. Funding Agencies None","PeriodicalId":508018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"547 ","pages":"176 - 177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwad061.221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Reported rates of anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation to tumor necrosis factor-a antagonists (anti-TNF) range from 20-75%. One way to reduce the risk of ADA formation is to combine a second immune-suppressing agent such as azathioprine (AZA) with the anti-TNF agent, known as combination therapy. However, it is unknown if the risk of combination therapy, including the additive risk of AZA and anti-TNF side effects, could be reduced by exposing individuals with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) to the lowest dose of azathioprine while still maintaining the beneficial effect of ADA prevention. Aims To identify the minimum dose of AZA needed to prevent ADA formation to anti-TNF agents in individuals with IBD receiving combination therapy. We also assessed the occurrence of adverse drug events, treatment loss of response, treatment discontinuation and the need for treatment dose escalation. Methods A retrospective cohort study is ongoing in adult participants with IBDreceiving either infliximab or adalimumab in combination with AZA. Patients are divided based on their AZA dosage (low dose group, AZA ampersand:003C2mg/kg/day versus standard dose group, AZA 2mg/kg/day). All participants will be followed for 1 year and observed for the occurrence of ADA formation, adverse drug events, treatment loss of response, treatment discontinuation and the need for treatment dose escalation. Results To date, 48 participants are currently included (low dose, n=29; standard dose, n=19). 42 are on Infliximab and 6 are on Adalimumab. The occurrence of ADA was 17.4% in the low dose group and 20% in the standard dose group (pampersand:003E0.99). More participants lost response to treatment and discontinued anti-TNF therapy in the standard dose group (n=7/19, 36.8%) versus the low-dose group (n=8/29, 27.6%, p=0.54). More participants in the low-dose group received anti-TNF dose escalation (n= 20/29,68.9%) compared to the standard dose group (n=6/19, 31.6%, p=0.017). Adverse events, to Anti-TNF was seen in (n=3/19, 15.7%) in the standard dose group, in comparison to (n=4/29, 13.79%, pampersand:003E0.99) in the low dose group. Adverse events to AZA were surprisingly higher in the low dose group (n=14/29, 48.3%) while in the standard dose, it was (n=5/19, 26.3%, p=0.14). Conclusions The preliminary result of the study suggests that there is no significant difference in anti-drug antibody formation between standard and low doses of azathioprine in combination with anti-TNF therapy, in addition, data showed significant lower rates of Anti-TNF discontinuation and loss of response to treatment in low Azathioprine dose group. Completion of the study will help further define if low-dose AZA can be used for ADA prevention in anti-TNF combination therapy without compromising important clinical outcomes. Funding Agencies None
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A221 在抗肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)联合疗法中使用硫唑嘌呤剂量阈值,以尽量减少炎症性肠病患者的免疫原性并优化疗效。回顾性队列研究
摘要 背景 据报道,肿瘤坏死因子-a 拮抗剂(抗肿瘤坏死因子)的抗药物抗体(ADA)形成率为 20-75%。降低ADA形成风险的一种方法是将硫唑嘌呤(AZA)等第二种免疫抑制药与抗肿瘤坏死因子药联合使用,即所谓的联合疗法。然而,让炎症性肠病(IBD)患者接受最低剂量的硫唑嘌呤治疗是否能降低联合治疗的风险(包括 AZA 和抗肿瘤坏死因子副作用的叠加风险),同时仍能保持预防 ADA 的有益效果,目前尚不得而知。目的 确定在接受联合疗法的 IBD 患者中,为预防抗肿瘤坏死因子药物的 ADA 形成所需的最低 AZA 剂量。我们还评估了药物不良事件的发生率、治疗失效、治疗中断以及治疗剂量升级的必要性。方法 目前正在对接受英夫利西单抗或阿达木单抗与 AZA 联合治疗的成年 IBD 患者进行一项回顾性队列研究。患者根据AZA剂量进行分组(低剂量组,AZA安培:003C2mg/kg/天;标准剂量组,AZA 2mg/kg/天)。所有参与者都将接受为期 1 年的随访,观察是否出现 ADA 形成、药物不良事件、治疗无效、治疗中断以及是否需要增加治疗剂量。结果 目前共有 48 名参与者(低剂量,29 人;标准剂量,19 人)。42人使用英夫利西单抗,6人使用阿达木单抗。低剂量组的ADA发生率为17.4%,标准剂量组为20%(pampersand:003E0.99)。与低剂量组(8/29,27.6%,P=0.54)相比,标准剂量组(7/19,36.8%)有更多患者对治疗失去反应并停止了抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗。与标准剂量组(6/19,31.6%,P=0.017)相比,低剂量组接受抗肿瘤坏死因子剂量升级的参与者更多(20/29,68.9%)。标准剂量组(n=3/19,15.7%)与低剂量组(n=4/29,13.79%,pampersand:003E0.99)相比,出现了抗肿瘤坏死因子的不良反应。令人惊讶的是,低剂量组对 AZA 的不良反应更高(n=14/29,48.3%),而标准剂量组为(n=5/19,26.3%,p=0.14)。结论 该研究的初步结果表明,标准剂量和低剂量硫唑嘌呤联合抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗在抗药物抗体形成方面没有显著差异,此外,数据显示低剂量硫唑嘌呤组的抗肿瘤坏死因子停药率和治疗反应消失率显著降低。该研究的完成将有助于进一步确定低剂量硫唑嘌呤是否可用于在抗肿瘤坏死因子联合疗法中预防ADA,同时又不影响重要的临床结果。资助机构 无
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Contemporary epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma: understanding risk factors and surveillance strategies Identification and prioritization of patient-centred strategies to enhance IBD-related care for older adults: a modified Delphi approach Rectal varices treated by retrograde transvenous obliteration Canadian colorectal cancer screening programs: How do they measure up using the International Agency for Research on Cancer criteria for organized screening? A78 VALIDITY EVIDENCE FOR OBSERVATIONAL EUS COMPETENCY ASSESSMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1