Epistemic outsiders: Unpacking and utilising the epistemic dimension of disruptive agency in sustainability transformations

Sergiu Spatan, Daniel Peter, Gundula Thiele, Marc Wolfram, Franziska Ehnert, Stefan Scherbaum, Moritz Schulz, Caroline Surrey
{"title":"Epistemic outsiders: Unpacking and utilising the epistemic dimension of disruptive agency in sustainability transformations","authors":"Sergiu Spatan, Daniel Peter, Gundula Thiele, Marc Wolfram, Franziska Ehnert, Stefan Scherbaum, Moritz Schulz, Caroline Surrey","doi":"10.1371/journal.pstr.0000097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Disruptions (systemic disturbances) are crucial to initiate and accelerate sustainability transformations of large-scale social systems (be they socio-ecological, socio-technical, or socio-institutional). Their emergence, characteristics and effects strongly relate to the role of agents who aim to disrupt and transform the status quo, and which thus possess what we call disruptive agency. In this paper, we highlight the epistemic dimension of disruptive agency in social transformations, first by conceptualizing disruptive agents as epistemic outsiders with respect to the social system that they intend to disrupt and transform, and second by connecting this conceptualization to notions of belief, social practices, social networks, discourses, or institutions. We identify five advantages of this approach. Firstly, it informs and conceptually enables various promising interdisciplinary avenues to explore and potentially influence transformative change towards sustainability. Secondly, an epistemic conception of disruptive agency offers a key for an integrated analysis of the individual and collective levels of agency involved in sustainability transformations. Thirdly, the notion of epistemic outsiders conceptually connects agent positions across system boundaries that are understood to be of crucial importance for sustainability transformations respectively (e.g., “niche innovators” or “regime intermediaries”) but which lack an integrated understanding. Fourthly, an epistemic perspective additionally highlights the changing requirements and challenges resulting in two principal stages of transformations unfolding over time, namely before/after a new epistemic layout is shared by a majority of agents. Finally, the above features allow to derive and conceive of new intervention formats and strategies.","PeriodicalId":384293,"journal":{"name":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","volume":"93 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS Sustainability and Transformation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pstr.0000097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disruptions (systemic disturbances) are crucial to initiate and accelerate sustainability transformations of large-scale social systems (be they socio-ecological, socio-technical, or socio-institutional). Their emergence, characteristics and effects strongly relate to the role of agents who aim to disrupt and transform the status quo, and which thus possess what we call disruptive agency. In this paper, we highlight the epistemic dimension of disruptive agency in social transformations, first by conceptualizing disruptive agents as epistemic outsiders with respect to the social system that they intend to disrupt and transform, and second by connecting this conceptualization to notions of belief, social practices, social networks, discourses, or institutions. We identify five advantages of this approach. Firstly, it informs and conceptually enables various promising interdisciplinary avenues to explore and potentially influence transformative change towards sustainability. Secondly, an epistemic conception of disruptive agency offers a key for an integrated analysis of the individual and collective levels of agency involved in sustainability transformations. Thirdly, the notion of epistemic outsiders conceptually connects agent positions across system boundaries that are understood to be of crucial importance for sustainability transformations respectively (e.g., “niche innovators” or “regime intermediaries”) but which lack an integrated understanding. Fourthly, an epistemic perspective additionally highlights the changing requirements and challenges resulting in two principal stages of transformations unfolding over time, namely before/after a new epistemic layout is shared by a majority of agents. Finally, the above features allow to derive and conceive of new intervention formats and strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识上的局外人:解读和利用可持续发展变革中颠覆性机构的认识论维度
破坏(系统性干扰)对于启动和加速大规模社会系统(无论是社会-生态、社会-技术还是社会-制度)的可持续性转型至关重要。它们的出现、特点和影响与旨在破坏和改变现状的主体的作用密切相关,因此,这些主体拥有我们所说的破坏性代理权。在本文中,我们强调了社会变革中破坏性代理的认识论维度,首先将破坏性代理概念化为他们意图破坏和变革的社会体系的认识论局外人,其次将这一概念化与信仰、社会实践、社会网络、话语或制度等概念联系起来。我们认为这种方法有五个优点。首先,它为探索各种有前途的跨学科途径提供了信息和概念,并有可能对可持续发展的转型变革产生影响。其次,颠覆性机构的认识论概念为综合分析可持续发展转型所涉及的个人和集体机构层面提供了一把钥匙。第三,"认识论局外人 "概念从概念上将跨越系统界限的代理地位联系起来,这些代理地位分别被认为对可持续性转型至关重要(如 "利基创新者 "或 "制度中介"),但却缺乏综合理解。第四,认识论视角还强调了不断变化的要求和挑战,这些要求和挑战产生于随着时间推移而展开的转型的两个主要阶段,即在新的认识论布局被大多数行为主体共享之前/之后。最后,上述特点有助于推导和构思新的干预形式和战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International alliances and technology diffusion: A worldwide analysis of adoption of energy, railway and satellite technologies An assessment of policies to promote perennial energy crop and woodland planting Media narratives on (Ecological) sustainability: A topic modeling analysis of entrepreneurship news in the MENA region Circular bioeconomy practices and their associations with household food security in four RUNRES African city regions Haven or hell? A perspective on the ecology of offshore oil and gas platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1