Demystifying simulators for educators in healthcare

Brendan Goodwin, Debra Nestel
{"title":"Demystifying simulators for educators in healthcare","authors":"Brendan Goodwin, Debra Nestel","doi":"10.54531/muif5353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When entering the world of simulation development and scenario design for the first time, healthcare educators are often confronted with the perplexing diversity of simulation, which includes a vast array of educational experiences for learners. This essay seeks to demystify the growing number of technologies and simulators (commonly known as simulation modalities). Simulators can be classified as computer-based simulation, simulated participants (SP), simulated clinical immersion or procedural simulation, in addition to ‘mixed’ and ‘hybrid’ simulations. Each modality has intrinsic benefits and limitations, but ultimately their use must be guided by the desired learning outcomes of the learning experience, together with the appropriate realism required for the simulation. No matter the simulator being used, the ultimate experience of the learner is still arguably wholly dependent on good curriculum development, instructional design and scenario delivery.","PeriodicalId":506634,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Healthcare Simulation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/muif5353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When entering the world of simulation development and scenario design for the first time, healthcare educators are often confronted with the perplexing diversity of simulation, which includes a vast array of educational experiences for learners. This essay seeks to demystify the growing number of technologies and simulators (commonly known as simulation modalities). Simulators can be classified as computer-based simulation, simulated participants (SP), simulated clinical immersion or procedural simulation, in addition to ‘mixed’ and ‘hybrid’ simulations. Each modality has intrinsic benefits and limitations, but ultimately their use must be guided by the desired learning outcomes of the learning experience, together with the appropriate realism required for the simulation. No matter the simulator being used, the ultimate experience of the learner is still arguably wholly dependent on good curriculum development, instructional design and scenario delivery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为医疗保健领域的教育工作者揭开模拟器的神秘面纱
当医疗保健教育工作者第一次进入模拟开发和情景设计领域时,往往会面临模拟的多样性,其中包括为学习者提供的大量教育体验。本文试图揭开日益增多的技术和模拟器(通常称为模拟模式)的神秘面纱。除了 "混合 "和 "混合 "模拟外,模拟器还可分为计算机模拟、模拟参与者(SP)、模拟临床沉浸或程序模拟。每种模拟方式都有其固有的优势和局限性,但最终都必须以学习体验的预期学习效果以及模拟所需的适当真实性为指导。可以说,无论使用哪种模拟器,学习者的最终体验仍然完全取决于良好的课程开发、教学设计和情景交付。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mixed reality simulation training in the assessment and management of acutely unwell patients in undergraduate medical education: a pilot study Virtual reality versus webinar trans healthcare training for emergency medicine residents: a feasibility study Using Forum Theatre techniques in teaching and learning about professionalism and communication in healthcare Revising the ASPiH standards: reflections on the evolution of simulated practice Stress and resilience among military medical students completing a high-fidelity military medical simulation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1