Can crop production intensification through irrigation be sustainable? An ex-ante impact study of the south-central coastal zone of Bangladesh

Zahirul Haque Khan, Md Saiful Islam, Shume Akhter, Md Raqubul Hasib, A. Sutradhar, J. Timsina, T. Krupnik, U. Schulthess
{"title":"Can crop production intensification through irrigation be sustainable? An ex-ante impact study of the south-central coastal zone of Bangladesh","authors":"Zahirul Haque Khan, Md Saiful Islam, Shume Akhter, Md Raqubul Hasib, A. Sutradhar, J. Timsina, T. Krupnik, U. Schulthess","doi":"10.1371/journal.pwat.0000153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Bangladesh’s south-central coastal zone, there is considerable potential to intensify crop production by growing dry winter season ‘Boro’ rice, maize, wheat, pulses and oilseeds using irrigation from southward flowing and predominantly freshwater rivers. However, the impacts of surface water withdrawal for sustained irrigation and its safe operating space remain unclear. We used field measurements and simulation modeling to investigate the effects of irrigation water withdrawal for Boro rice–the most water-consumptive crop–on river water flow and salinity under different climate change and river flow scenarios. Under the baseline conditions, about 250,000 ha could potentially be irrigated with river water that has salinity levels below 2 dS/m. The impact on river water salinity would be minimal, and only between 0.71 to 1.12% of the cropland would shift from the 0–2 dS/m class to higher salinity levels. Similarly, for the moderate climate change scenario (RCP 4.5) that forecasts a sea level rise of 22 cm in 2050, there would be a minor change in water flow and salinity. Only under the extreme climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), resulting in a sea level rise of 43 cm by 2050 and low flow conditions that are exceeded in 90% of the cases, the 2 dS/m isohaline would move landward by 64 to 105 km in March and April for the Tentulia and Buriswar Rivers. This would expose an additional 36.6% of potentially irrigable cropland to salinity levels of 2 to 4 dS/m. However, Boro rice will already be well established by that time and can tolerate greater levels of salinity. We conclude that there is considerable scope to expand irrigated crop production without negatively exposing the cropland and rivers to detrimental salinization levels while preserving the ecosystem services of the rivers.","PeriodicalId":93672,"journal":{"name":"PLOS water","volume":"54 13","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Bangladesh’s south-central coastal zone, there is considerable potential to intensify crop production by growing dry winter season ‘Boro’ rice, maize, wheat, pulses and oilseeds using irrigation from southward flowing and predominantly freshwater rivers. However, the impacts of surface water withdrawal for sustained irrigation and its safe operating space remain unclear. We used field measurements and simulation modeling to investigate the effects of irrigation water withdrawal for Boro rice–the most water-consumptive crop–on river water flow and salinity under different climate change and river flow scenarios. Under the baseline conditions, about 250,000 ha could potentially be irrigated with river water that has salinity levels below 2 dS/m. The impact on river water salinity would be minimal, and only between 0.71 to 1.12% of the cropland would shift from the 0–2 dS/m class to higher salinity levels. Similarly, for the moderate climate change scenario (RCP 4.5) that forecasts a sea level rise of 22 cm in 2050, there would be a minor change in water flow and salinity. Only under the extreme climate change scenario (RCP 8.5), resulting in a sea level rise of 43 cm by 2050 and low flow conditions that are exceeded in 90% of the cases, the 2 dS/m isohaline would move landward by 64 to 105 km in March and April for the Tentulia and Buriswar Rivers. This would expose an additional 36.6% of potentially irrigable cropland to salinity levels of 2 to 4 dS/m. However, Boro rice will already be well established by that time and can tolerate greater levels of salinity. We conclude that there is considerable scope to expand irrigated crop production without negatively exposing the cropland and rivers to detrimental salinization levels while preserving the ecosystem services of the rivers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过灌溉提高作物产量能否持续?孟加拉国中南部沿海地区的事前影响研究
在孟加拉国中南部沿海地区,利用南流的淡水河灌溉种植冬季旱季 "Boro "稻、玉米、小麦、豆类和油菜籽,提高作物产量的潜力相当大。然而,地表水持续灌溉的影响及其安全运行空间仍不明确。我们利用实地测量和模拟模型,研究了在不同气候变化和河流流量情景下,博罗水稻(耗水量最大的作物)灌溉取水对河流水流量和盐度的影响。在基线条件下,约 25 万公顷的灌溉用水可能是盐度低于 2 dS/m 的河水。这对河水盐度的影响微乎其微,只有 0.71% 到 1.12% 的耕地会从 0-2 dS/m 的盐度等级转为较高的盐度等级。同样,在预测 2050 年海平面上升 22 厘米的中度气候变化情景(RCP 4.5)下,水流和盐度的变化也很小。只有在极端气候变化情景下(RCP 8.5),即到 2050 年海平面上升 43 厘米,90% 的情况下会超过低流量条件,在 3 月和 4 月,Tentulia 河和 Buriswar 河的 2 dS/m 等盐度将向陆地移动 64 至 105 千米。这将使另外 36.6% 的潜在可灌溉耕地面临 2 至 4 dS/m 的盐度水平。然而,届时波罗水稻已经成熟,可以耐受更高的盐度。我们的结论是,在不使耕地和河流受到有害盐碱化水平的负面影响,同时保护河流生态系统服务的情况下,扩大灌溉作物生产的空间相当大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing state partner use of the Model Aquatic Health Code (MAHC): A cross comparison of five states with varying degrees of self-reported adoption status Virtual water flows in a real world Optimizing machine learning for water safety: A comparative analysis with dimensionality reduction and classifier performance in potability prediction Assessing the sustained effects of a water filter intervention: A 30-month longitudinal study in Rwamagana, Rwanda 222 nm causes greater protein damage and repair inhibition of E. coli than 254 nm for water disinfection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1