Incidence, Risk Factors and Microbiological Profile of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Patients in ICU in Tertiary Care Hospital

Anil Kumar Behera, H. Guruprasad, Shivram, Navoday, Divya, Madhusudhan Reddy, Bharadwaj, Manswini, Atahullah
{"title":"Incidence, Risk Factors and Microbiological Profile of Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Patients in ICU in Tertiary Care Hospital","authors":"Anil Kumar Behera, H. Guruprasad, Shivram, Navoday, Divya, Madhusudhan Reddy, Bharadwaj, Manswini, Atahullah","doi":"10.9734/jamps/2024/v26i3675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: VAP, or ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most common ICU-acquired diseases and a significant cause of mortality among Intensive Care Unit patients. Infectious illnesses are currently underestimated in the South Asian Region, which has limited health resources. \nObjective: To examine the incidence of VAP, risk factors associated and the microbiological profile in ICU patients in tertiary care hospitals. \nMethods: A total of 114 patients under mechanical who satisfied all inclusion criteria were selected. Detailed history, investigations were undertaken. The diagnosis of VAP was made according to clinical and laboratory findings (as per CDC criteria) and incidence was derived from the number of patients developing VAP out of the total number of patients on ventilatory support in ICU. \nResults: We included 114 patients in our study. Out of 114 patients, the majority were above 70 years age group Mean age of study population was 61.29±13.42 years. Out of 114, 80 patients i.e. 70.2% were males and 34(29.8%) were females. Male: female ratio was 2.3:1. Klebsiella Pneumonia was a commonly observed organism in cultures i.e. 30.7%, followed by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in 27.2% and Acinetobacter Baumani in 19.3%. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella Pneumonia showed resistance to Carbapenemase in 20(57.1%) cases and to ESBL in 15(42.9%) cases. Death rate in our study was 17.5% \nConclusion: The outcome of VAP depends on rapid identification of the causative microorganism. Empirical therapy based on knowledge of the most prevalent microorganisms and their resistance pattern has an impact on lowering morbidity and mortality, shortening the length of hospital stay, lowering of treatment expenses, and prevents the development of MDR bacteria in patients with VAP.","PeriodicalId":14903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"47 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/jamps/2024/v26i3675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: VAP, or ventilator-associated pneumonia, is one of the most common ICU-acquired diseases and a significant cause of mortality among Intensive Care Unit patients. Infectious illnesses are currently underestimated in the South Asian Region, which has limited health resources. Objective: To examine the incidence of VAP, risk factors associated and the microbiological profile in ICU patients in tertiary care hospitals. Methods: A total of 114 patients under mechanical who satisfied all inclusion criteria were selected. Detailed history, investigations were undertaken. The diagnosis of VAP was made according to clinical and laboratory findings (as per CDC criteria) and incidence was derived from the number of patients developing VAP out of the total number of patients on ventilatory support in ICU. Results: We included 114 patients in our study. Out of 114 patients, the majority were above 70 years age group Mean age of study population was 61.29±13.42 years. Out of 114, 80 patients i.e. 70.2% were males and 34(29.8%) were females. Male: female ratio was 2.3:1. Klebsiella Pneumonia was a commonly observed organism in cultures i.e. 30.7%, followed by Pseudomonas Aeruginosa in 27.2% and Acinetobacter Baumani in 19.3%. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of Klebsiella Pneumonia showed resistance to Carbapenemase in 20(57.1%) cases and to ESBL in 15(42.9%) cases. Death rate in our study was 17.5% Conclusion: The outcome of VAP depends on rapid identification of the causative microorganism. Empirical therapy based on knowledge of the most prevalent microorganisms and their resistance pattern has an impact on lowering morbidity and mortality, shortening the length of hospital stay, lowering of treatment expenses, and prevents the development of MDR bacteria in patients with VAP.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
三级医院重症监护病房呼吸机相关肺炎患者的发病率、风险因素和微生物学特征
背景:VAP 或呼吸机相关肺炎是重症监护病房最常见的疾病之一,也是导致重症监护病房患者死亡的一个重要原因。在医疗资源有限的南亚地区,目前对感染性疾病的估计不足。目的研究三级医院重症监护室患者 VAP 的发病率、相关风险因素和微生物学特征。方法选取符合所有纳入标准的 114 名机械治疗患者。进行了详细的病史和检查。根据临床和实验室检查结果(按照疾病预防控制中心的标准)做出 VAP 诊断,并根据 ICU 呼吸机支持患者总数中发生 VAP 的患者人数得出发病率。研究结果研究共纳入 114 名患者。研究对象的平均年龄为(61.29±13.42)岁。114 名患者中有 80 名男性,占 70.2%;34 名女性,占 29.8%。男女比例为 2.3:1。肺炎克雷伯菌是培养物中常见的微生物,占 30.7%,其次是绿脓杆菌(27.2%)和鲍曼不动杆菌(19.3%)。肺炎克雷伯氏菌的抗生素敏感性模式显示,20 例(57.1%)对碳青霉烯酶耐药,15 例(42.9%)对 ESBL 耐药。在我们的研究中,死亡率为 17.5% 结论:VAP 的治疗效果取决于能否快速识别致病微生物。基于对最常见微生物及其耐药性模式的了解而采取的经验性治疗可降低 VAP 患者的发病率和死亡率、缩短住院时间、降低治疗费用并防止 MDR 细菌的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating Compliance and Performance of 0.5 mL AD Syringes: A Global Standards Review Acute Toxicity, Antioxidant and Vasodilatory Properties of Sclerocarya birrea (A. rich.) Hochst (Anacardiaceae) Trunk Bark’s Aqueous Decoction Towards Effective Healthcare Delivery: An Assessment of Public Perception of Pharmacist’s Role in Nigeria Multiple Drug Resistance in Burn Patients In-Process Quality Checks and Post-Market Surveillance of Artemether-Lumefantrine Fixed-dose Combination Tablets and Suspensions: Current Procedures, Successes, Advances, and Challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1