Transglutaminase-induced Cornea Collagen Crosslinking Effect on Central Corneal Thickness and Keratocyte Cell Density

PUSPITA HAPSARI SITORASMI, Yuniar Sarah Ningtiyas, Indri Wahyuni, Yulia Primatasari
{"title":"Transglutaminase-induced Cornea Collagen Crosslinking Effect on Central Corneal Thickness and Keratocyte Cell Density","authors":"PUSPITA HAPSARI SITORASMI, Yuniar Sarah Ningtiyas, Indri Wahyuni, Yulia Primatasari","doi":"10.35749/b8s0fh73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nIntroduction & Objectives : This research is aimed to evaluate the effect of transglutaminase-induced corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) on central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratocyte cell density in vivo. \nMethods : Twenty-eight white New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups: the transglutaminase- induced CXL group, the epithelial-off CXL group, the transepithelial CXL group, and the control group. The ocular surface was treated with a 1 U/mL microbial transglutaminase solution, and both the epithelial-off and transepithelial groups were exposed to clinical ultraviolet A-riboflavin (UVA/RF). The efficacy of each group was evaluated on the 14th day after the procedures. Central corneal thickness was evaluated with Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) and keratocyte cell density wad evaluated with histopathology examination. \nResults : Transglutaminase-induced CXL group exhibited the highest mean biomechanical CCT (370.14 ± 38.85) in comparison to the UVA/RF epithelial-off group (368.00 ± 25.48), the UVA/RF transepithelial group (369.86 ± 23.43), and the control group (365.14 ± 28.74). Still, there was no significant differences in both biomechanical CCT (p=0.990). Transglutaminase-induced CXL group had the highest mean of keratocyte cell density (43.26 ± 10.65) compared to UVA/RF epithelial-off (29.99 ± 4.79), UVA/RF transepithelial group (42.03 ± 6.55), and control group (34.36 ± 6.76). There was a significant difference between the group, with a p-value of 0.008. \nConclusion : Transglutaminase shown that it produces favorable results for CCT and keratocyte density after CXL, which are two factors contributing to corneal rigidity. The outcomes are equivalent to riboflavin used as a conventional element in CXL.","PeriodicalId":165753,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","volume":"33 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmologica Indonesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35749/b8s0fh73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction & Objectives : This research is aimed to evaluate the effect of transglutaminase-induced corneal collagen crosslinking (CXL) on central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratocyte cell density in vivo. Methods : Twenty-eight white New Zealand rabbits were divided into four groups: the transglutaminase- induced CXL group, the epithelial-off CXL group, the transepithelial CXL group, and the control group. The ocular surface was treated with a 1 U/mL microbial transglutaminase solution, and both the epithelial-off and transepithelial groups were exposed to clinical ultraviolet A-riboflavin (UVA/RF). The efficacy of each group was evaluated on the 14th day after the procedures. Central corneal thickness was evaluated with Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST) and keratocyte cell density wad evaluated with histopathology examination. Results : Transglutaminase-induced CXL group exhibited the highest mean biomechanical CCT (370.14 ± 38.85) in comparison to the UVA/RF epithelial-off group (368.00 ± 25.48), the UVA/RF transepithelial group (369.86 ± 23.43), and the control group (365.14 ± 28.74). Still, there was no significant differences in both biomechanical CCT (p=0.990). Transglutaminase-induced CXL group had the highest mean of keratocyte cell density (43.26 ± 10.65) compared to UVA/RF epithelial-off (29.99 ± 4.79), UVA/RF transepithelial group (42.03 ± 6.55), and control group (34.36 ± 6.76). There was a significant difference between the group, with a p-value of 0.008. Conclusion : Transglutaminase shown that it produces favorable results for CCT and keratocyte density after CXL, which are two factors contributing to corneal rigidity. The outcomes are equivalent to riboflavin used as a conventional element in CXL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转谷氨酰胺酶诱导的角膜胶原交联对角膜中央厚度和角膜细胞密度的影响
摘要 引言与目的:本研究旨在评估转谷氨酰胺酶诱导的角膜胶原交联(CXL)对体内角膜中央厚度(CCT)和角膜细胞密度的影响。方法:将 28 只新西兰白兔分为四组:转谷氨酰胺酶诱导的 CXL 组、上皮脱落的 CXL 组、经上皮的 CXL 组和对照组。用 1 U/mL的微生物转谷氨酰胺酶溶液处理眼球表面,上皮脱落组和经上皮组均接受临床紫外线 A-核黄素(UVA/RF)照射。各组的疗效在手术后第 14 天进行评估。用角膜可视化技术(Corvis ST)评估中心角膜厚度,用组织病理学检查评估角膜细胞密度。结果:与 UVA/RF 上皮-关闭组(368.00 ± 25.48)、UVA/RF 经上皮组(369.86 ± 23.43)和对照组(365.14 ± 28.74)相比,转谷氨酰胺酶诱导的 CXL 组显示出最高的平均生物力学 CCT(370.14 ± 38.85)。不过,两种生物力学 CCT 均无明显差异(P=0.990)。与 UVA/RF 上皮-关闭组(29.99 ± 4.79)、UVA/RF 经上皮组(42.03 ± 6.55)和对照组(34.36 ± 6.76)相比,转谷氨酰胺酶诱导的 CXL 组角膜细胞密度平均值最高(43.26 ± 10.65)。组间差异明显,P 值为 0.008。结论:转谷氨酰胺酶对 CXL 后的 CCT 和角膜细胞密度(导致角膜僵化的两个因素)有良好效果。其结果与 CXL 中作为常规元素使用的核黄素相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN ESOTROPIA AT CIPTO MANGUNKUSUMO HOSPITAL: A 4-YEAR OBSERVATION ON CHARACTERISTIC AND RESULT VISUAL OUTCOME OF TRAUMATIC OPTIC NEUROPATHYAFTER STEROID TREATMENT IN KARIADI HOSPITAL UNVEILING OPHTHALMOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN CORNELIA DE LANGE SYNDROME: A RARE CASE REPORT NEUROOPHTHALMOLOGIC MANIFESTATIONS AMONG 195 PATIENTS WITH INTRACRANIAL TUMOR AT NATIONAL REFERRAL HOSPITAL  AN ATYPICAL CASE OF BILATERAL CORNEAL OPACITY: WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE DIAGNOSIS?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1