Evaluating E-court systems in regional governments in developing countries using technology acceptance model

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information Development Pub Date : 2024-02-12 DOI:10.1177/02666669241229176
Mohammed Abubakr Ahmed, Tugberk Kaya, Tolgay Karanfiller
{"title":"Evaluating E-court systems in regional governments in developing countries using technology acceptance model","authors":"Mohammed Abubakr Ahmed, Tugberk Kaya, Tolgay Karanfiller","doi":"10.1177/02666669241229176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the rise of digital transformations, the integration of advanced technologies in law courts globally is accelerating. This technological adoption enhances the efficiency and reach of justice administration, encompassing case registration, decision-making, and execution. This study investigates the acceptance and usage of e-court systems by regional governments in developing countries, utilizing the technology acceptance model (TAM) as the evaluative framework. As e-court systems become increasingly crucial in enhancing the efficiency and transparency of judicial proceedings, understanding their acceptance within developing countries becomes significant. It examines the role of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) in shaping attitudes toward using (ATU) in these systems, ultimately influencing the behavioral intention to use (BIU). Primary data collected from several regional governments employing e-court systems are analyzed. The findings indicate varying acceptance levels, predominantly influenced by the perceived usefulness of the systems in streamlining court processes. However, the perceived ease of use is less influential, indicating a potential area of improvement for system developers. This research contributes to the discourse on the digital transformation of judicial systems in developing regions, providing insights that could guide effective policy formulation and implementation.","PeriodicalId":47137,"journal":{"name":"Information Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Development","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241229176","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the rise of digital transformations, the integration of advanced technologies in law courts globally is accelerating. This technological adoption enhances the efficiency and reach of justice administration, encompassing case registration, decision-making, and execution. This study investigates the acceptance and usage of e-court systems by regional governments in developing countries, utilizing the technology acceptance model (TAM) as the evaluative framework. As e-court systems become increasingly crucial in enhancing the efficiency and transparency of judicial proceedings, understanding their acceptance within developing countries becomes significant. It examines the role of perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEOU) in shaping attitudes toward using (ATU) in these systems, ultimately influencing the behavioral intention to use (BIU). Primary data collected from several regional governments employing e-court systems are analyzed. The findings indicate varying acceptance levels, predominantly influenced by the perceived usefulness of the systems in streamlining court processes. However, the perceived ease of use is less influential, indicating a potential area of improvement for system developers. This research contributes to the discourse on the digital transformation of judicial systems in developing regions, providing insights that could guide effective policy formulation and implementation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用技术接受模式评估发展中国家地区政府的电子法院系统
由于数字化转型的兴起,全球法院正在加速整合先进技术。这种技术应用提高了司法管理的效率和覆盖范围,包括案件登记、决策和执行。本研究以技术接受模型(TAM)为评估框架,调查了发展中国家地区政府对电子法院系统的接受和使用情况。随着电子法院系统在提高司法程序的效率和透明度方面变得越来越重要,了解发展中国家对其的接受程度就变得非常重要。本研究探讨了感知有用性(PU)和感知易用性(PEOU)在形成这些系统的使用态度(ATU)方面的作用,并最终影响使用的行为意向(BIU)。本文分析了从几个采用电子法院系统的地区政府收集到的原始数据。研究结果表明,人们对电子法院系统的接受程度各不相同,主要受系统在简化法院流程方面的实用性影响。不过,易用性的影响较小,这表明系统开发人员有可能在这一领域进行改进。这项研究为有关发展中地区司法系统数字化转型的讨论做出了贡献,提供了可指导有效政策制定和实施的真知灼见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information Development
Information Development INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Information Development is a peer-reviewed journal that aims to provide authoritative coverage of current developments in the provision, management and use of information throughout the world, with particular emphasis on the information needs and problems of developing countries. It deals with both the development of information systems, services and skills, and the role of information in personal and national development.
期刊最新文献
Awareness, knowledge, and attitude towards artificial intelligence: Perspective of medical students in Ghana Implementing national performance indicator ontology: A case study of Botswana's development agendas Using an extended technology acceptance model to understand the behavioral adoption intention of mobile commerce among Chinese consumers Core problems in information systems implementation: An analytical review and implications for AI systems Integrating information ethics into library and information science curriculum at a public university in Malawi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1