IMPACT OF DIFFERENT NPK LEVELS AND SOWING METHODS ON MAIZE GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS

Aziz Laghari, M. Buriro, Ghulam Mustafa Laghari, K. H. Talpur
{"title":"IMPACT OF DIFFERENT NPK LEVELS AND SOWING METHODS ON MAIZE GROWTH, YIELD, AND QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS","authors":"Aziz Laghari, M. Buriro, Ghulam Mustafa Laghari, K. H. Talpur","doi":"10.34016/pjbt.2024.21.01.824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crop management practices are crucially important to increased yield and quality. This research study was planned to investigate the effects of different levels of NPK and sowing methods on maize. Results showed that different NPK levels and sowing methods significantly affected the growth and yield traits of maize (p<0.05). The better results for plant height (cm), leaf area index, cob length (cm), grains per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain yield (kg ha-1), protein content (%) total sugars (%) and starch (%) were recorded when crop-fertilized NPK with 150-120-120 kg ha-1. However, all these parameters were marginally different compared to NPK rate of 120-90-90 kg ha-1, except for plant height (cm). This treatment produced significantly higher grain yield and quality traits of maize compared to lower and control treatment. Minimum values for plant height (cm), leaf area index, cob length (cm), grains per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain yield kg ha-1, protein content (%), total sugars (%) and starch (%) were noted in the control treatment. In case of sowing methods, ridge sowing produced maximum plant height (cm) , leaf area index, 50% days to tasselling and yield contributing characters like cob length (cm), grains cob-1, 1000-grain weight (g) and grain yield (kg ha-1) of maize as compared to broadcasting and drilling sowing methods. But sowing methods did not significantly affected the quality characteristics of maize, particularly protein content (%), total sugars (%) and starch (%). Among different sowing methods,  ridge sowing method produced the maximum grain yield kg ha-1 of maize as compared to drilling and broadcasting. Considering the results comprehensively, the NPK rate of 120-90-90 kg ha-1 under ridge method would be the best management practice for maize cultivation:","PeriodicalId":411068,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology","volume":"41 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34016/pjbt.2024.21.01.824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crop management practices are crucially important to increased yield and quality. This research study was planned to investigate the effects of different levels of NPK and sowing methods on maize. Results showed that different NPK levels and sowing methods significantly affected the growth and yield traits of maize (p<0.05). The better results for plant height (cm), leaf area index, cob length (cm), grains per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain yield (kg ha-1), protein content (%) total sugars (%) and starch (%) were recorded when crop-fertilized NPK with 150-120-120 kg ha-1. However, all these parameters were marginally different compared to NPK rate of 120-90-90 kg ha-1, except for plant height (cm). This treatment produced significantly higher grain yield and quality traits of maize compared to lower and control treatment. Minimum values for plant height (cm), leaf area index, cob length (cm), grains per cob, 1000-grain weight, grain yield kg ha-1, protein content (%), total sugars (%) and starch (%) were noted in the control treatment. In case of sowing methods, ridge sowing produced maximum plant height (cm) , leaf area index, 50% days to tasselling and yield contributing characters like cob length (cm), grains cob-1, 1000-grain weight (g) and grain yield (kg ha-1) of maize as compared to broadcasting and drilling sowing methods. But sowing methods did not significantly affected the quality characteristics of maize, particularly protein content (%), total sugars (%) and starch (%). Among different sowing methods,  ridge sowing method produced the maximum grain yield kg ha-1 of maize as compared to drilling and broadcasting. Considering the results comprehensively, the NPK rate of 120-90-90 kg ha-1 under ridge method would be the best management practice for maize cultivation:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同氮磷钾水平和播种方法对玉米生长、产量和品质特征的影响
作物管理方法对提高产量和质量至关重要。本研究计划调查不同氮磷钾水平和播种方法对玉米的影响。结果表明,不同氮磷钾水平和播种方法对玉米的生长和产量性状有显著影响(p<0.05)。当作物施肥氮磷钾为 150-120-120 kg ha-1 时,株高(厘米)、叶面积指数、棒长(厘米)、每棒粒数、千粒重、谷物产量(kg ha-1)、蛋白质含量(%)、总糖(%)和淀粉(%)的结果较好。然而,与氮磷钾施肥量为 120-90-90 千克/公顷相比,除株高(厘米)外,所有这些参数都略有不同。与较低的处理和对照处理相比,该处理的玉米产量和质量性状明显更高。对照处理的株高(厘米)、叶面积指数、棒长(厘米)、每棒粒数、千粒重、每公顷谷物产量公斤-1、蛋白质含量(%)、总糖含量(%)和淀粉含量(%)均为最低值。在播种方法方面,与撒播和穴播相比,脊播能产生最高的株高(厘米)、叶面积指数、50%抽穗天数以及玉米棒长(厘米)、棒粒-1、千粒重(克)和谷物产量(公斤/公顷-1)等产量贡献特征。但播种方法对玉米的品质特征,尤其是蛋白质含量(%)、总糖(%)和淀粉(%)没有明显影响。在不同的播种方法中,与钻播和撒播相比,脊播法的玉米产量最高(每公顷千克)。综合考虑这些结果,脊播法的氮磷钾用量为 120-90-90 kg ha-1 将是玉米种植的最佳管理方法:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PURIFICATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF AMYLASE PRODUCED FROM PROBIOTIC LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM CS FOR INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS FUNCTIONAL COMPONENTS AND MEDICINAL PROPERTIES FOODS INDUCED TOXIC EFFECTS OF CHLORPYRIFOS ON HEMATOLOGICAL INDICES IN PIGEONS (COLUMBA LIVIA DOMESTICA) COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF NEEM OIL DERIVATIVES WITH IMIDACLOPRID AGAINST OKRA JASSID, AMRASCA BIGUTTULA (ISHIDA) PROXIMATE COMPOSITION, AMINO ACID PROFILING, AND SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF PROCESSED NATURAL VEGETATION OF THARPARKAR
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1