CFD Analysis of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Rheological Tests

Fluids Pub Date : 2024-02-11 DOI:10.3390/fluids9020045
T. Jirout, Adam Krupica, Alexandr Kolomijec
{"title":"CFD Analysis of Ultra-High-Performance Concrete Rheological Tests","authors":"T. Jirout, Adam Krupica, Alexandr Kolomijec","doi":"10.3390/fluids9020045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study connects and compares the results from two different rheological measurement techniques, namely, the slump test and rotational rheometry, on UHPC (Ultra-High-Performance Concrete) through the use of commercially available numerical simulation software ANSYS Fluent 2022 R2. The workability and resulting mechanical properties of the UHPC (a material used in construction) are highly dependent on its rheology and, hence, also on the composition and level of homogeneity of the assessed mixture. It is generally understood that the most suitable rheological model for concrete mixtures is the Hershel–Bulkley model. However, obtaining reliable rheological data is complicated as the wide-gap rotational rheometers developed for concrete show bias in their measurements even on precise laboratory equipment, while common industrial tests, such as the slump test, do not produce the usual shear rate–shear stress relation and, hence, do not allow for more complex analysis. Recently, a new methodology for the rheological measurement of non-Newtonian fluids that utilises a simple power input–rotation speed measurement was published. However, in this study, only model liquids were evaluated, and the method was not validated for more complex fluids such as pastes. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to show this method’s suitability for fine pastes through a comparison with the slump test, using numerical simulation.","PeriodicalId":510749,"journal":{"name":"Fluids","volume":"84 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids9020045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study connects and compares the results from two different rheological measurement techniques, namely, the slump test and rotational rheometry, on UHPC (Ultra-High-Performance Concrete) through the use of commercially available numerical simulation software ANSYS Fluent 2022 R2. The workability and resulting mechanical properties of the UHPC (a material used in construction) are highly dependent on its rheology and, hence, also on the composition and level of homogeneity of the assessed mixture. It is generally understood that the most suitable rheological model for concrete mixtures is the Hershel–Bulkley model. However, obtaining reliable rheological data is complicated as the wide-gap rotational rheometers developed for concrete show bias in their measurements even on precise laboratory equipment, while common industrial tests, such as the slump test, do not produce the usual shear rate–shear stress relation and, hence, do not allow for more complex analysis. Recently, a new methodology for the rheological measurement of non-Newtonian fluids that utilises a simple power input–rotation speed measurement was published. However, in this study, only model liquids were evaluated, and the method was not validated for more complex fluids such as pastes. Therefore, it was the goal of this study to show this method’s suitability for fine pastes through a comparison with the slump test, using numerical simulation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超高性能混凝土流变试验的 CFD 分析
本研究通过使用市售数值模拟软件 ANSYS Fluent 2022 R2,将两种不同的流变测量技术(即坍落度试验和旋转流变仪)的结果联系起来,并对 UHPC(超高性能混凝土)进行比较。超高性能混凝土(一种用于建筑的材料)的工作性和由此产生的机械性能在很大程度上取决于其流变性,因此也取决于所评估混合物的成分和均匀程度。一般认为,最适合混凝土混合物的流变模型是 Hershel-Bulkley 模型。然而,获取可靠的流变数据非常复杂,因为即使在精密的实验室设备上,为混凝土开发的宽间隙旋转流变仪的测量也会出现偏差,而普通的工业试验,如坍落度试验,不会产生通常的剪切速率-剪切应力关系,因此无法进行更复杂的分析。最近,一种利用简单的功率输入-转速测量非牛顿流体流变学的新方法被公布出来。然而,在这项研究中,只对模型液体进行了评估,而且没有对糊状等更复杂的流体进行验证。因此,本研究的目标是利用数值模拟,通过与坍落度试验的比较,证明该方法适用于精细糊状物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Integrated Aerodynamic Shape and Aero-Structural Optimization: Applications from Ahmed Body to NACA 0012 Airfoil and Wind Turbine Blades Flowfield and Noise Dynamics of Supersonic Rectangular Impinging Jets: Major versus Minor Axis Orientations Rim Driven Thruster as Innovative Propulsion Element for Dual Phase Flows in Plug Flow Reactors Investigation of Convective Heat Transfer and Stability on a Rotating Disk: A Novel Experimental Method and Thermal Modeling Visualization and Quantification of Facemask Leakage Flows and Interpersonal Transmission with Varying Face Coverings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1