Differentiation of Hamartomas and Malignant Lung Tumors in Single-Phased Dual-Energy Computed Tomography

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-02-11 DOI:10.3390/tomography10020020
M. Winkelmann, S. Gassenmaier, Sven S. Walter, Christoph Artzner, Konstantin Nikolaou, M. Bongers
{"title":"Differentiation of Hamartomas and Malignant Lung Tumors in Single-Phased Dual-Energy Computed Tomography","authors":"M. Winkelmann, S. Gassenmaier, Sven S. Walter, Christoph Artzner, Konstantin Nikolaou, M. Bongers","doi":"10.3390/tomography10020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the efficacy of single-phase dual-energy CT (DECT) in differentiating pulmonary hamartomas from malignant lung lesions using virtual non-contrast (VNC), iodine, and fat quantification. Forty-six patients with 47 pulmonary lesions (mean age: 65.2 ± 12.1 years; hamartomas-to-malignant lesions = 22:25; male: 67%) underwent portal venous DECT using histology, PET-CT and follow-up CTs as a reference. Quantitative parameters such as VNC, fat fraction, iodine density and CT mixed values were statistically analyzed. Significant differences were found in fat fractions (hamartomas: 48.9%; malignancies: 22.9%; p ≤ 0.0001) and VNC HU values (hamartomas: −20.5 HU; malignancies: 17.8 HU; p ≤ 0.0001), with hamartomas having higher fat content and lower VNC HU values than malignancies. CT mixed values also differed significantly (p ≤ 0.0001), but iodine density showed no significant differences. ROC analysis favored the fat fraction (AUC = 96.4%; sensitivity: 100%) over the VNC, CT mixed value and iodine density for differentiation. The study concludes that the DECT-based fat fraction is superior to the single-energy CT in differentiating between incidental pulmonary hamartomas and malignant lesions, while post-contrast iodine density is ineffective for differentiation.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":"86 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography10020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the efficacy of single-phase dual-energy CT (DECT) in differentiating pulmonary hamartomas from malignant lung lesions using virtual non-contrast (VNC), iodine, and fat quantification. Forty-six patients with 47 pulmonary lesions (mean age: 65.2 ± 12.1 years; hamartomas-to-malignant lesions = 22:25; male: 67%) underwent portal venous DECT using histology, PET-CT and follow-up CTs as a reference. Quantitative parameters such as VNC, fat fraction, iodine density and CT mixed values were statistically analyzed. Significant differences were found in fat fractions (hamartomas: 48.9%; malignancies: 22.9%; p ≤ 0.0001) and VNC HU values (hamartomas: −20.5 HU; malignancies: 17.8 HU; p ≤ 0.0001), with hamartomas having higher fat content and lower VNC HU values than malignancies. CT mixed values also differed significantly (p ≤ 0.0001), but iodine density showed no significant differences. ROC analysis favored the fat fraction (AUC = 96.4%; sensitivity: 100%) over the VNC, CT mixed value and iodine density for differentiation. The study concludes that the DECT-based fat fraction is superior to the single-energy CT in differentiating between incidental pulmonary hamartomas and malignant lesions, while post-contrast iodine density is ineffective for differentiation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单相双能量计算机断层扫描中 Hamartomas 与恶性肺肿瘤的鉴别
本研究采用虚拟非对比(VNC)、碘和脂肪定量法研究了单相双能 CT(DECT)在区分肺部火腿肠瘤和肺部恶性病变方面的疗效。46 名患有 47 个肺部病灶的患者(平均年龄:65.2 ± 12.1 岁;仓瘤与恶性病灶的比例 = 22:25;男性:67%)接受了门静脉 DECT,并以组织学、PET-CT 和后续 CT 作为参考。对 VNC、脂肪分数、碘密度和 CT 混合值等定量参数进行了统计分析。脂肪分数(火腿肠瘤:48.9%;恶性肿瘤:22.9%;p ≤ 0.0001)和 VNC HU 值(火腿肠瘤:-20.5 HU;恶性肿瘤:17.8 HU;p ≤ 0.0001)存在显著差异,与恶性肿瘤相比,火腿肠瘤的脂肪含量更高,VNC HU 值更低。CT混合值也有显著差异(p≤ 0.0001),但碘密度无显著差异。ROC 分析显示,脂肪分数(AUC = 96.4%;灵敏度:100%)优于 VNC、CT 混合值和碘密度的分辨能力。该研究得出结论,基于 DECT 的脂肪分数在区分偶然性肺火腿肠瘤和恶性病变方面优于单能 CT,而对比后碘密度对区分无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Silk Protein-Based Materials for Photothermal Therapy: From Morphologies to Multifunctional Applications. 3D Bioprinting of Continuous Nanofibrous Yarn-Reinforced Cell-Laden Constructs. β-Carboline-Based Fluorescent Probes Sense and Stabilize G-quadruplex DNA Structures. Macrophage-Targeted Fullerene Potentiates Redox Homeostasis Regulation and Reprograms Macrophage Polarization to Ameliorate Hepatic Steatosis. Tumor Microenvironment Stimuli-Responsive Polypeptide Manganese-Calcium Nanomodulator Orchestrating Chemodynamic Therapy and Alleviating Hypoxia in Tumors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1