Family‐based preventive intervention for children of parents with severe mental illness: A randomized clinical trial

JCPP advances Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.1002/jcv2.12216
Anne Dorothee Müller, I. C. T. Gjøde, Nikolaj Thams, Sidsel Ingversen, Mala Moszkowicz, J. Jepsen, L. J. Mikkelsen, S. S. Nielsen, N. Hemager, M. Nordentoft, A. Thorup
{"title":"Family‐based preventive intervention for children of parents with severe mental illness: A randomized clinical trial","authors":"Anne Dorothee Müller, I. C. T. Gjøde, Nikolaj Thams, Sidsel Ingversen, Mala Moszkowicz, J. Jepsen, L. J. Mikkelsen, S. S. Nielsen, N. Hemager, M. Nordentoft, A. Thorup","doi":"10.1002/jcv2.12216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Children of parents with a severe mental illness have an increased risk of developing a lifetime mental illness. We aimed to compare the effects of a preventive family‐based intervention, VIA Family, with treatment as usual (TAU) on these children's global functioning.Between 2017 and 2021, we conducted a pragmatic, rater‐blinded, two‐arm parallel‐group superiority trial in Denmark. Families with at least one child aged 6–12 years and at least one biological parent with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or recurrent major or moderate depression were included. We randomly allocated 95 families with their 113 children to VIA Family or TAU (ratio 1:1). VIA Family was individually tailored and based on case management. The intervention included options for psychoeducation, parental support, and treatment for emerging child psychiatric symptoms. Blinded raters assessed children and their families at baseline and after 18 months. The primary outcome was the difference in change between groups at end‐of‐treatment in daily global functioning measured with the Children's Global Assessment Scale. Secondary outcomes were emotional and behavioral problems and days absent from school. We analyzed data blinded to allocation.At post‐intervention, differences in mean change from baseline between VIA Family and TAU were non‐significant (CGAS: −1.20, 95% CI = −6.61; 4.21, p = 0.66), as were the differences on the secondary and exploratory outcomes.Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find a superior effect of VIA Family compared with TAU. The short follow‐up period and large sample heterogeneity might explain the null findings. Therefore, a possible long‐term, preventive treatment effect has yet to be explored.","PeriodicalId":73542,"journal":{"name":"JCPP advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCPP advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcv2.12216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children of parents with a severe mental illness have an increased risk of developing a lifetime mental illness. We aimed to compare the effects of a preventive family‐based intervention, VIA Family, with treatment as usual (TAU) on these children's global functioning.Between 2017 and 2021, we conducted a pragmatic, rater‐blinded, two‐arm parallel‐group superiority trial in Denmark. Families with at least one child aged 6–12 years and at least one biological parent with schizophrenia spectrum disorder, bipolar disorder, or recurrent major or moderate depression were included. We randomly allocated 95 families with their 113 children to VIA Family or TAU (ratio 1:1). VIA Family was individually tailored and based on case management. The intervention included options for psychoeducation, parental support, and treatment for emerging child psychiatric symptoms. Blinded raters assessed children and their families at baseline and after 18 months. The primary outcome was the difference in change between groups at end‐of‐treatment in daily global functioning measured with the Children's Global Assessment Scale. Secondary outcomes were emotional and behavioral problems and days absent from school. We analyzed data blinded to allocation.At post‐intervention, differences in mean change from baseline between VIA Family and TAU were non‐significant (CGAS: −1.20, 95% CI = −6.61; 4.21, p = 0.66), as were the differences on the secondary and exploratory outcomes.Contrary to our hypothesis, we did not find a superior effect of VIA Family compared with TAU. The short follow‐up period and large sample heterogeneity might explain the null findings. Therefore, a possible long‐term, preventive treatment effect has yet to be explored.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对父母患有严重精神疾病的儿童进行基于家庭的预防性干预:随机临床试验
父母患有严重精神疾病的儿童终生罹患精神疾病的风险会增加。2017年至2021年期间,我们在丹麦开展了一项务实、评分者盲法、双臂平行组优效试验。试验对象包括至少有一名6-12岁儿童、至少有一名亲生父母患有精神分裂症谱系障碍、双相情感障碍或复发性重度或中度抑郁症的家庭。我们将 95 个家庭及其 113 名儿童随机分配到 VIA 家庭或 TAU(比例为 1:1)。VIA 家庭 "以个案管理为基础,为每个家庭量身定制。干预措施包括心理教育、父母支持和治疗新出现的儿童精神症状。蒙眼评定员在基线和 18 个月后对儿童及其家庭进行评估。主要结果是治疗结束时各组在儿童整体评估量表测量的日常整体功能方面的变化差异。次要结果是情绪和行为问题以及缺课天数。与我们的假设相反,我们没有发现 VIA 家庭治疗与 TAU 治疗相比有更好的效果。与我们的假设相反,我们并没有发现 VIA Family 比 TAU 更优越的效果。随访时间短和样本异质性大可能是导致结果无效的原因。因此,可能的长期预防性治疗效果还有待探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Implementing open science and reproducible research practices in mental health research through registered reports Special educational needs provision and academic outcomes for children with teacher reported language difficulties at school entry Examining the association of neighborhood conditions on attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms in autistic youth using the child opportunity index 2.0 The trajectory of anxiety symptoms during the transition from childhood to young adulthood is predicted by IQ and sex, but not polygenic risk scores
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1