{"title":"Demographic, neuropsychological, and speech variables that impact iconic and supplementary-to-speech gesturing in\n aphasia","authors":"B. Stark, Grace Oeding","doi":"10.1075/gest.23019.sta","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We model the role of demographic, neuropsychological and speech variables in characterizing iconic gesture use in\n speakers with aphasia, especially gestures that supplement speech and are essential for understanding the spoken message. Using\n backward regression modelling with cross validation in 37 speakers with aphasia, literature-derived demographic (e.g., age),\n neuropsychological (e.g., aphasia and anomia severity), and speech (e.g., speaking duration) variables were used to predict\n frequency and rate (per minute) of iconic, supplementary, and essential gesturing. We identified that nearly 60% of iconic\n gestures produced by speakers were supplementary to speech with 38% being essential for understanding the speech. Generally, those\n with more severe aphasia, anomia, and with nonfluent aphasia tended to produce fewer tokens and a slower rate of speech, and these\n were the speakers who produced more and a higher rate of supplementary and essential gestures. These findings underline the\n importance of iconic gestures to improve communication.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":"150 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.23019.sta","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We model the role of demographic, neuropsychological and speech variables in characterizing iconic gesture use in
speakers with aphasia, especially gestures that supplement speech and are essential for understanding the spoken message. Using
backward regression modelling with cross validation in 37 speakers with aphasia, literature-derived demographic (e.g., age),
neuropsychological (e.g., aphasia and anomia severity), and speech (e.g., speaking duration) variables were used to predict
frequency and rate (per minute) of iconic, supplementary, and essential gesturing. We identified that nearly 60% of iconic
gestures produced by speakers were supplementary to speech with 38% being essential for understanding the speech. Generally, those
with more severe aphasia, anomia, and with nonfluent aphasia tended to produce fewer tokens and a slower rate of speech, and these
were the speakers who produced more and a higher rate of supplementary and essential gestures. These findings underline the
importance of iconic gestures to improve communication.