Automated Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis by Echocardiography without ECG: Accuracy and Applications of a New Deep Learning Approach

Diseases Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.3390/diseases12020035
Nelson Lu, H. Vaseli, M. Mahdavi, Fatemah Taheri Dezaki, C. Luong, Darwin Yeung, Ken Gin, Michael Y. Tsang, P. Nair, John Jue, Marion Barnes, D. Behnami, P. Abolmaesumi, Teresa S. M. Tsang
{"title":"Automated Atrial Fibrillation Diagnosis by Echocardiography without ECG: Accuracy and Applications of a New Deep Learning Approach","authors":"Nelson Lu, H. Vaseli, M. Mahdavi, Fatemah Taheri Dezaki, C. Luong, Darwin Yeung, Ken Gin, Michael Y. Tsang, P. Nair, John Jue, Marion Barnes, D. Behnami, P. Abolmaesumi, Teresa S. M. Tsang","doi":"10.3390/diseases12020035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Automated rhythm detection on echocardiography through artificial intelligence (AI) has yet to be fully realized. We propose an AI model trained to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) using apical 4-chamber (AP4) cines without requiring electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography studies of consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old at our tertiary care centre were retrospectively reviewed for AF and sinus rhythm. The study was first interpreted by level III-trained echocardiography cardiologists as the gold standard for rhythm diagnosis based on ECG rhythm strip and imaging assessment, which was also verified with a 12-lead ECG around the time of the study. AP4 cines with three cardiac cycles were then extracted from these studies with the rhythm strip and Doppler information removed and introduced to the deep learning model ResNet(2+1)D with an 80:10:10 training–validation–test split ratio. Results: 634 patient studies (1205 cines) were included. After training, the AI model achieved high accuracy on validation for detection of both AF and sinus rhythm (mean F1-score = 0.92; AUROC = 0.95). Performance was consistent on the test dataset (mean F1-score = 0.94, AUROC = 0.98) when using the cardiologist’s assessment of the ECG rhythm strip as the gold standard, who had access to the full study and external ECG data, while the AI model did not. Conclusions: AF detection by AI on echocardiography without ECG appears accurate when compared to an echocardiography cardiologist’s assessment of the ECG rhythm strip as the gold standard. This has potential clinical implications in point-of-care ultrasound and stroke risk stratification.","PeriodicalId":11200,"journal":{"name":"Diseases","volume":"52 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12020035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Automated rhythm detection on echocardiography through artificial intelligence (AI) has yet to be fully realized. We propose an AI model trained to identify atrial fibrillation (AF) using apical 4-chamber (AP4) cines without requiring electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Methods: Transthoracic echocardiography studies of consecutive patients ≥ 18 years old at our tertiary care centre were retrospectively reviewed for AF and sinus rhythm. The study was first interpreted by level III-trained echocardiography cardiologists as the gold standard for rhythm diagnosis based on ECG rhythm strip and imaging assessment, which was also verified with a 12-lead ECG around the time of the study. AP4 cines with three cardiac cycles were then extracted from these studies with the rhythm strip and Doppler information removed and introduced to the deep learning model ResNet(2+1)D with an 80:10:10 training–validation–test split ratio. Results: 634 patient studies (1205 cines) were included. After training, the AI model achieved high accuracy on validation for detection of both AF and sinus rhythm (mean F1-score = 0.92; AUROC = 0.95). Performance was consistent on the test dataset (mean F1-score = 0.94, AUROC = 0.98) when using the cardiologist’s assessment of the ECG rhythm strip as the gold standard, who had access to the full study and external ECG data, while the AI model did not. Conclusions: AF detection by AI on echocardiography without ECG appears accurate when compared to an echocardiography cardiologist’s assessment of the ECG rhythm strip as the gold standard. This has potential clinical implications in point-of-care ultrasound and stroke risk stratification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无需心电图即可通过超声心动图自动诊断心房颤动:新型深度学习方法的准确性与应用
背景:通过人工智能(AI)在超声心动图上自动检测心律尚未完全实现。我们提出了一种经过训练的人工智能模型,无需心电图(ECG)数据即可使用心尖四腔(AP4)超声心动图识别心房颤动(AF)。方法:经胸超声对我们三级医疗中心连续接受超声心动图检查的 18 岁以上患者进行房颤和窦性心律回顾性检查。研究首先由经过三级培训的超声心动图心脏病专家根据心电图节律条和影像学评估进行解读,作为节律诊断的金标准,同时在研究前后用 12 导联心电图进行验证。然后,从这些研究中提取三个心动周期的 AP4 cines,去除心律带和多普勒信息,并将其引入深度学习模型 ResNet(2+1)D 中,训练-验证-测试的分配比例为 80:10:10。结果共纳入 634 项患者研究(1205 cines)。经过训练后,人工智能模型在房颤和窦性心律的验证检测中都达到了很高的准确率(平均 F1 分数 = 0.92;AUROC = 0.95)。当使用心脏病专家对心电图节律条的评估作为金标准时,在测试数据集上的表现是一致的(平均 F1 分数 = 0.94,AUROC = 0.98)。结论与作为金标准的超声心动图心内科医师对心电图节律条的评估相比,人工智能在无心电图的超声心动图上检测房颤似乎更准确。这对护理点超声和中风风险分层具有潜在的临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Onset and Disease Activity: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate? Unveiling the Immunostimulatory Potential of Rhus Toxicodendron in Immunocompromised Balb/C Mice Induced with Cyclophosphamide Could Ocular Glands Be Infected by SARS-CoV-2? Sudden Cardiac Death-Etiology, Risk Factors and Demographic Characteristics: An Extensive Study of 1618 Forensic Autopsies Paediatric Calcaneal Osteochondroma: A Case Report and a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1