The Association between Diagnosis-to-Ablation Time and the Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Diseases Pub Date : 2024-02-09 DOI:10.3390/diseases12020038
A. Năstasă, Mohamad Hussam Sahloul, C. Iorgulescu, Ștefan Bogdan, A. Scărlătescu, Steliana-Cosmina Paja, Adelina Pupăză, Raluca-Elena Mitran, V. Gondoș, R. Vătășescu
{"title":"The Association between Diagnosis-to-Ablation Time and the Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Cohort Study","authors":"A. Năstasă, Mohamad Hussam Sahloul, C. Iorgulescu, Ștefan Bogdan, A. Scărlătescu, Steliana-Cosmina Paja, Adelina Pupăză, Raluca-Elena Mitran, V. Gondoș, R. Vătășescu","doi":"10.3390/diseases12020038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in maintaining sinus rhythm. Novel evidence suggests that increasing the time between the first diagnosis of AF and ablation, or diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT), is a predictor for AF recurrence post-ablation. Purpose: Our primary objective was to investigate the relationship between DAT and AF recurrence after a first ablation. Methods: Patients with AF who underwent CA in our center were enrolled consecutively, and a retrospective analysis was performed. DAT was treated as a continuous variable and reported as a median for the group with recurrence and the group without recurrence. DAT was also considered as a categorical variable and patients were stratified into three categories: DAT < 1 year, DAT < 2 years, and DAT < 4 years. Results: The cohort included 107 patients, with a mean age of 54.3 ± 11.7 years. Mean DAT was significantly longer in those with AF recurrence: 4.9(3.06) years versus 3.99(3.5) (p = 0.04). The Kaplan–Meier curve revealed a higher likelihood of AF-free status over time for patients with DAT < 2 years compared to those with DAT > 2 years (p = 0.04). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that left atrial volume index (LAVI), obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and DAT > 2 years were independently associated with AF recurrence after a single AF ablation procedure (p = 0.007, p = 0.02, and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: A shorter duration between the first AF diagnosis and AF ablation is associated with an increased likelihood of procedural success after a single AF ablation procedure.","PeriodicalId":11200,"journal":{"name":"Diseases","volume":"47 6-7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases12020038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs in maintaining sinus rhythm. Novel evidence suggests that increasing the time between the first diagnosis of AF and ablation, or diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT), is a predictor for AF recurrence post-ablation. Purpose: Our primary objective was to investigate the relationship between DAT and AF recurrence after a first ablation. Methods: Patients with AF who underwent CA in our center were enrolled consecutively, and a retrospective analysis was performed. DAT was treated as a continuous variable and reported as a median for the group with recurrence and the group without recurrence. DAT was also considered as a categorical variable and patients were stratified into three categories: DAT < 1 year, DAT < 2 years, and DAT < 4 years. Results: The cohort included 107 patients, with a mean age of 54.3 ± 11.7 years. Mean DAT was significantly longer in those with AF recurrence: 4.9(3.06) years versus 3.99(3.5) (p = 0.04). The Kaplan–Meier curve revealed a higher likelihood of AF-free status over time for patients with DAT < 2 years compared to those with DAT > 2 years (p = 0.04). Cox multivariate analysis indicated that left atrial volume index (LAVI), obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA), and DAT > 2 years were independently associated with AF recurrence after a single AF ablation procedure (p = 0.007, p = 0.02, and p = 0.03, respectively). Conclusion: A shorter duration between the first AF diagnosis and AF ablation is associated with an increased likelihood of procedural success after a single AF ablation procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诊断到消融时间与心房颤动复发之间的关系:回顾性队列研究
背景:心房颤动(房颤)导管消融术(CA)在维持窦性心律方面优于抗心律失常药物。新证据表明,增加首次诊断房颤与消融之间的时间,即诊断至消融时间(DAT),是预测消融后房颤复发的一个因素。目的:我们的主要目的是研究 DAT 与首次消融后房颤复发之间的关系。方法连续登记在本中心接受 CA 的房颤患者,并进行回顾性分析。DAT被视为连续变量,并以复发组和未复发组的中位数进行报告。DAT也被视为一个分类变量,患者被分为三类:DAT<1年、DAT<2年和DAT<4年。研究结果组群包括 107 名患者,平均年龄为(54.3 ± 11.7)岁。房颤复发患者的平均停跳时间明显更长:4.9(3.06)年对3.99(3.5)年(P = 0.04)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示,与 DAT > 2 年的患者相比,DAT < 2 年的患者随着时间的推移无房颤状态的可能性更高(p = 0.04)。Cox 多变量分析表明,左心房容积指数(LAVI)、阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)和 DAT > 2 年与单次房颤消融术后房颤复发独立相关(分别为 p = 0.007、p = 0.02 和 p = 0.03)。结论首次房颤诊断与房颤消融之间的时间越短,单次房颤消融术后手术成功的可能性越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Helicobacter pylori Eradication on Inflammatory Bowel Disease Onset and Disease Activity: To Eradicate or Not to Eradicate? Unveiling the Immunostimulatory Potential of Rhus Toxicodendron in Immunocompromised Balb/C Mice Induced with Cyclophosphamide Could Ocular Glands Be Infected by SARS-CoV-2? Sudden Cardiac Death-Etiology, Risk Factors and Demographic Characteristics: An Extensive Study of 1618 Forensic Autopsies Paediatric Calcaneal Osteochondroma: A Case Report and a Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1