Mapping the ethic-theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence research

IF 2.2 Q3 BUSINESS Thunderbird International Business Review Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.1002/tie.22368
Gareth R. T. White, Anthony Samuel, Paul Jones, Naveen Madhavan, Ademola Afolayan, Ahmed Abdullah, Tanmay Kaushik
{"title":"Mapping the ethic-theoretical foundations of artificial intelligence research","authors":"Gareth R. T. White,&nbsp;Anthony Samuel,&nbsp;Paul Jones,&nbsp;Naveen Madhavan,&nbsp;Ademola Afolayan,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdullah,&nbsp;Tanmay Kaushik","doi":"10.1002/tie.22368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The issue of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics is a prominent research subject. While there is a compendious literature that explores this area, surprisingly little of it makes explicit reference to the ethic-theoretical foundations upon which it is built. To address this matter, this study makes an examination of the AI ethics literature to identify its ethic-theoretical foundations. The study identifies the lack of AI ethics literature that draws upon seminal ethics works and the ensuing disconnectedness among the publications on this subject. It also uncovers numerous non-Western ethic-theoretical positions that can be adopted and may afford new insight into AI ethics research and practice. Employing these alternative lenses may obviate the tendency for Western worldviews to dominate the academic literature. The study provides some guidance for future AI ethics research which should endeavor to clearly articulate its chosen ethic-theoretical position, and for practice which could benefit from understanding and articulating the principles upon which AI systems are founded. It also provides some observations of, and guidance for, the utilization of Litmaps software in the conduct of Literature reviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"66 2","pages":"171-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tie.22368","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thunderbird International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.22368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics is a prominent research subject. While there is a compendious literature that explores this area, surprisingly little of it makes explicit reference to the ethic-theoretical foundations upon which it is built. To address this matter, this study makes an examination of the AI ethics literature to identify its ethic-theoretical foundations. The study identifies the lack of AI ethics literature that draws upon seminal ethics works and the ensuing disconnectedness among the publications on this subject. It also uncovers numerous non-Western ethic-theoretical positions that can be adopted and may afford new insight into AI ethics research and practice. Employing these alternative lenses may obviate the tendency for Western worldviews to dominate the academic literature. The study provides some guidance for future AI ethics research which should endeavor to clearly articulate its chosen ethic-theoretical position, and for practice which could benefit from understanding and articulating the principles upon which AI systems are founded. It also provides some observations of, and guidance for, the utilization of Litmaps software in the conduct of Literature reviews.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制人工智能研究的伦理理论基础图
人工智能(AI)伦理问题是一个突出的研究课题。虽然探讨这一领域的文献浩如烟海,但令人惊讶的是,其中很少有文献明确提及作为其基础的伦理理论基础。为了解决这个问题,本研究对人工智能伦理文献进行了研究,以确定其伦理理论基础。研究发现,缺乏借鉴开创性伦理学著作的人工智能伦理学文献,因此有关这一主题的出版物之间存在脱节现象。研究还发现了许多可以采用的非西方伦理理论立场,它们可能为人工智能伦理研究和实践提供新的见解。采用这些替代视角可以避免西方世界观主导学术文献的趋势。本研究为未来的人工智能伦理研究提供了一些指导,这些研究应努力清楚地阐明其所选择的伦理理论立场,同时也为实践提供了一些指导,这些实践可从理解和阐明人工智能系统所依据的原则中获益。本研究还为使用 Litmaps 软件进行文献综述提供了一些意见和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Thunderbird International Business Review is a peer-reviewed journal that is published six times a year in cooperation with the Thunderbird School of Global Business Management, the world"s leading institution in the education of global managers. The journal"s aim is to advance and disseminate research in the field of international business. Its main target audience includes academicians and executives in business and government who have an interest in international business.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Stimuli Behind SMEs' Export Decisions: Evidence From an Emerging Country During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Subnational Institutional Differences and FDI Spillovers Behind the R&D–Performance Relationship in Russia Trapped in Grandiosity? Narcissistic CEOs and Risk‐Taking in MENA Banks: The Moderating Effect of CEO Attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1