Walras and Tugan-Baranovsky on socialism: Reconciling economic science and social ideal

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2024-02-06 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-49-66
N. A. Makasheva
{"title":"Walras and Tugan-Baranovsky on socialism: Reconciling economic science and social ideal","authors":"N. A. Makasheva","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-49-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nowadays, Leon Walras (1839—1910) is well-known first and foremost for his “Elements of pure political economy, or the theory of public wealth” (1874, 1877) and Mikhail Ivanovich Tugan-Baranovsky (1865—1919) gained a wide recognition due to his book “Industrial crises in contemporary England: Their causes and influences on the life of the people” (1894), which had a significant impact on the development of economics. At the same time, both economists were deeply concerned not only with theoretical problems, but also with those that are now considered beyond the scope of theory, the problem of social ideal and that of a more just social system being among them. Walras and Tugan-Baranovsky associated the embodiment of the social ideal with socialism and strived for an economic system that corresponded to that ideal, albeit their conceptions of socialism being different. The principal opportunity to achieve reconciliation between science and ideal was associated with a synthetic approach reconciling the scientific method and ideal, economics being considered “a bridge” between them, or a «testing ground», where the reconciliation was to take place. Although history has shown that Walras’s and Tugan-Baranovsky’s ideas of socialism were utopian, the very fact that two eminent economists were deeply concerned with the problem of social ideal and socialism at a time when the foundations of modern economics were being laid, shows that the striving of economists to create objective and rigorous science was, to a measure, driven by their aspiration to solve the social problem and to set up a social and economic system which is rational and more just than the existing one","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2024-2-49-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nowadays, Leon Walras (1839—1910) is well-known first and foremost for his “Elements of pure political economy, or the theory of public wealth” (1874, 1877) and Mikhail Ivanovich Tugan-Baranovsky (1865—1919) gained a wide recognition due to his book “Industrial crises in contemporary England: Their causes and influences on the life of the people” (1894), which had a significant impact on the development of economics. At the same time, both economists were deeply concerned not only with theoretical problems, but also with those that are now considered beyond the scope of theory, the problem of social ideal and that of a more just social system being among them. Walras and Tugan-Baranovsky associated the embodiment of the social ideal with socialism and strived for an economic system that corresponded to that ideal, albeit their conceptions of socialism being different. The principal opportunity to achieve reconciliation between science and ideal was associated with a synthetic approach reconciling the scientific method and ideal, economics being considered “a bridge” between them, or a «testing ground», where the reconciliation was to take place. Although history has shown that Walras’s and Tugan-Baranovsky’s ideas of socialism were utopian, the very fact that two eminent economists were deeply concerned with the problem of social ideal and socialism at a time when the foundations of modern economics were being laid, shows that the striving of economists to create objective and rigorous science was, to a measure, driven by their aspiration to solve the social problem and to set up a social and economic system which is rational and more just than the existing one
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瓦尔拉斯和图甘-巴拉诺夫斯基论社会主义:协调经济科学与社会理想
如今,莱昂-瓦尔拉斯(1839-1910 年)首先因其《纯政治经济学要素或公共财富理论》(1874 年,1877 年)而闻名于世,米哈伊尔-伊万诺维奇-图甘-巴拉诺夫斯基(1865-1919 年)则因其《当代英国的工业危机》(1894 年)一书而广为人知:该书对经济学的发展产生了重大影响。同时,这两位经济学家不仅对理论问题深表关注,而且对那些现在被认为超出理论范畴的问题也深表关注,其中包括社会理想问题和更公正的社会制度问题。瓦尔拉斯和图甘-巴拉诺夫斯基将社会理想的体现与社会主义联系在一起,并努力寻求一种符合这一理想的经济制度,尽管他们对社会主义的概念有所不同。在科学与理想之间实现协调的主要机会是采用一种协调科学方法与理想的综合方法,经济学被认为是两者之间的 "桥梁 "或 "试验场",在这里可以实现协调。尽管历史证明瓦尔拉斯和图甘-巴拉诺夫斯基的社会主义思想是乌托邦式的,但在现代经济学奠基之时,两位著名经济学家对社会理想和社会主义问题的深切关注这一事实本身就表明,经济学家努力创造客观、严谨的科学,在一定程度上是出于解决社会问题、建立比现有制度更合理、更公正的社会经济制度的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
The world in the maze of sanctions: Ambiguity of empirical evidence How does bank lending affect small and medium-sized businesses? Reform of capital adequacy regulation in the world Islamic banking market Talents and their professors: What and how to teach? Reform of economic education or reform of economic knowledge?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1