Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey

L. D. de Beer, Leoni van der Vaart, Maximiliano Escaffi‐Schwarz, H. De Witte, W. Schaufeli
{"title":"Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey","authors":"L. D. de Beer, Leoni van der Vaart, Maximiliano Escaffi‐Schwarz, H. De Witte, W. Schaufeli","doi":"10.1027/1015-5759/a000797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study sought to investigate the measurement properties of a “gold standard” instrument for measuring burnout, the Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey (MBI-GS), with a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the primary aim its psychometric validation. The search spanned from January 1996 to December 2022 using the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, APA PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Our search identified 35 eligible studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Of these, 17 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the original 16-item version studies supported a three-dimensional representation of burnout with modest internal consistencies. However, similar to the narrative findings, it also indicated the viability of a two-factor solution. Consequently, the structural validity of the MBI-GS remains unclear, and so does its cross-cultural validity. The criterion validity of the cynicism and personal efficacy scales also raised a few questions. Overall, the findings provided some support for the adequacy of the measurement properties of the MBI-GS as a research tool measuring exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. However, we also identified challenges and practices of which researchers should be cognisant and that they should consider in future burnout projects.","PeriodicalId":508777,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","volume":"27 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychological Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Abstract: This study sought to investigate the measurement properties of a “gold standard” instrument for measuring burnout, the Maslach Burnout Inventory – General Survey (MBI-GS), with a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of studies that had as the primary aim its psychometric validation. The search spanned from January 1996 to December 2022 using the following databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, APA PsychINFO, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. Our search identified 35 eligible studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Of these, 17 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of the original 16-item version studies supported a three-dimensional representation of burnout with modest internal consistencies. However, similar to the narrative findings, it also indicated the viability of a two-factor solution. Consequently, the structural validity of the MBI-GS remains unclear, and so does its cross-cultural validity. The criterion validity of the cynicism and personal efficacy scales also raised a few questions. Overall, the findings provided some support for the adequacy of the measurement properties of the MBI-GS as a research tool measuring exhaustion, cynicism, and professional efficacy. However, we also identified challenges and practices of which researchers should be cognisant and that they should consider in future burnout projects.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
马斯拉赫倦怠感量表 - 一般调查
摘要:本研究试图通过对以心理测量学验证为主要目的的研究进行系统性文献回顾和荟萃分析,调查测量职业倦怠的 "黄金标准 "工具--马斯拉赫职业倦怠量表--一般调查(MBI-GS)的测量特性。搜索时间跨度为 1996 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月,使用的数据库包括Web of Science、Scopus、PubMed、APA PsychINFO、ScienceDirect 和 ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global。我们的搜索确定了 35 项符合条件的研究可纳入系统综述。其中 17 项被纳入荟萃分析。对最初的 16 项研究进行的荟萃分析支持倦怠的三维表述,其内部一致性一般。然而,与叙述性研究结果类似,荟萃分析也表明了双因素解决方案的可行性。因此,MBI-GS 的结构效度及其跨文化效度仍不明确。犬儒主义和个人效能量表的标准效度也提出了一些问题。总之,研究结果在一定程度上支持了 MBI-GS 作为测量疲惫、犬儒主义和职业效能的研究工具所具有的测量属性。不过,我们也发现了一些挑战和做法,研究人员应该认识到这些挑战和做法,并在今后的职业倦怠项目中加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness Briefly Correction to Rost et al. (2024) Adapting the BFI-2 Around the World – Coordinated Translation and Validation in Five Languages and Cultural Contexts Challenges for Psychological Assessment The Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Academic Grit Scale (AGS) in Chinese Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1