Linked Color Imaging of Barrett’s Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Effects on Visibility

M. Saito, T. Koike, Yuki Ohara, Yohei Ogata, Takeshi Kanno, Xiaoyi Jin, W. Hatta, K. Uno, N. Asano, A. Imatani, Atsushi Masamune
{"title":"Linked Color Imaging of Barrett’s Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Effects on Visibility","authors":"M. Saito, T. Koike, Yuki Ohara, Yohei Ogata, Takeshi Kanno, Xiaoyi Jin, W. Hatta, K. Uno, N. Asano, A. Imatani, Atsushi Masamune","doi":"10.3390/gastroent15010010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since linked color imaging (LCI) has been reported to increase the color differences in Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (BA) compared to white light imaging (WLI), a comparison of the visibility scores of various imaging techniques for BA is warranted to determine best practice standards. This study is to clarify the role of LCI, blue light imaging (BLI), and WLI in the evaluation of BA. A group of 19 endoscopists, comprised of 6 experts and 13 trainees, evaluated the visibility of WLI, BLI, and LCI images in 21 superficial BA cases. Visibility scores were compared between WLI, BLI, and LCI. Visibility scores were also evaluated for lesion morphology, background Barrett’s mucosa, and circumferential location. The visibility scores of experts and trainees were analyzed for comparison. The visibility scores of LCI and BLI were 3.83 and 3.31, respectively, compared to three points for WLI. The visibility of LCI was better than that of WLI regardless of lesion morphology, color, background Barrett’s mucosa, and circumferential location. The LCI improved visibility in BA more than the WLI for both experts and trainees. LCI improved the visibility of BA independent of lesion morphology, color, background Barrett’s mucosa, circumferential location, and the endoscopist’s experience.","PeriodicalId":503844,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/gastroent15010010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since linked color imaging (LCI) has been reported to increase the color differences in Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (BA) compared to white light imaging (WLI), a comparison of the visibility scores of various imaging techniques for BA is warranted to determine best practice standards. This study is to clarify the role of LCI, blue light imaging (BLI), and WLI in the evaluation of BA. A group of 19 endoscopists, comprised of 6 experts and 13 trainees, evaluated the visibility of WLI, BLI, and LCI images in 21 superficial BA cases. Visibility scores were compared between WLI, BLI, and LCI. Visibility scores were also evaluated for lesion morphology, background Barrett’s mucosa, and circumferential location. The visibility scores of experts and trainees were analyzed for comparison. The visibility scores of LCI and BLI were 3.83 and 3.31, respectively, compared to three points for WLI. The visibility of LCI was better than that of WLI regardless of lesion morphology, color, background Barrett’s mucosa, and circumferential location. The LCI improved visibility in BA more than the WLI for both experts and trainees. LCI improved the visibility of BA independent of lesion morphology, color, background Barrett’s mucosa, circumferential location, and the endoscopist’s experience.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴雷特食管腺癌的关联彩色成像:对可见度的影响
据报道,与白光成像(WLI)相比,联动彩色成像(LCI)可增加巴雷特食管腺癌(BA)的颜色差异,因此有必要比较各种成像技术对巴雷特食管腺癌的可见度评分,以确定最佳实践标准。本研究旨在明确LCI、蓝光成像(BLI)和WLI在评估BA中的作用。由 6 名专家和 13 名实习生组成的 19 名内镜医师小组评估了 21 个浅表 BA 病例中 WLI、BLI 和 LCI 图像的可见度。对 WLI、BLI 和 LCI 的可见度评分进行了比较。还根据病变形态、背景巴雷特粘膜和周缘位置对可见度评分进行了评估。对专家和学员的可见度评分进行了分析比较。LCI 和 BLI 的可见度评分分别为 3.83 分和 3.31 分,而 WLI 为 3 分。无论病变形态、颜色、背景巴雷特粘膜和周缘位置如何,LCI 的可见度均优于 WLI。对专家和学员而言,LCI 比 WLI 更能提高 BA 的可见度。LCI提高了BA的可见度,与病变形态、颜色、背景Barrett粘膜、周缘位置和内镜医师的经验无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clip Closure and PuraStat for Prevention of Clinically Significant Delayed Bleeding after Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Prospective, Observational Study Urinary Hydroxyproline as an Inflammation-Independent Biomarker of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Pre-Procedural Predictors of Successful Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty: A Retrospective Study Cytokine Signatures in Inflamed Mucosa of IBD Patients: State-of-the-Art p16 Expression in Multinucleated Stromal Cells of Fibroepithelial Polyps of the Anus (FEPA): A Comprehensive Review and Our Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1