Investigating the Seroconversion Patterns of Specific Antibodies Against Various Antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients and Vaccinated Individuals

Shahrzad Matinfar, Sahar Mortezagholi, Darya Amiri, Hossein Pashaiefar, Maryam Eskandarian, Somayeh Ghadimi, Mohammad Farzad Nazari, Shole Tavakoli, Melika Valizadeh, Saeed Namaki, P. Tabarsi, Mehdi Boutrabi, Mahdi Shabani
{"title":"Investigating the Seroconversion Patterns of Specific Antibodies Against Various Antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients and Vaccinated Individuals","authors":"Shahrzad Matinfar, Sahar Mortezagholi, Darya Amiri, Hossein Pashaiefar, Maryam Eskandarian, Somayeh Ghadimi, Mohammad Farzad Nazari, Shole Tavakoli, Melika Valizadeh, Saeed Namaki, P. Tabarsi, Mehdi Boutrabi, Mahdi Shabani","doi":"10.5812/archcid-140414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Inducing a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 may partially control virus dissemination. However, there is a lack of consistency in the reported kinetics of IgM and IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 may differ from that elicited by vaccination. Therefore, we were motivated to evaluate the kinetics of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in both infected and vaccinated individuals. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the seroconversion patterns of specific antibodies against various antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals, focusing specifically on comparing the humoral responses elicited by infection and vaccination. Methods: Serial blood and swab samples were collected from 134 COVID-19 patients at six time points following admission. Real-time RT-PCR specific for SARS-CoV-2, as well as anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG, were tested using ELISA. Additionally, 141 serum samples were obtained from vaccinated individuals. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike and RBD IgGs, along with neutralizing antibodies (NAs), were assessed using ELISA in both the vaccinated group and 96 COVID-19 patients. Results: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM was found positive in 23.3% of patients at 0 - 7 days after symptom onset, with seropositivity increasing to 71.7% at 15 - 21 days. Subsequently, IgM positivity gradually decreased to 62.7% at > 28 days post-symptom onset. Meanwhile, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was positive in 28.3% of patients at 0 -7 days, rising to 83.7% at 22 - 28 days after symptom onset, and remained constant thereafter. Anti-spike and RBD IgGs, along with NAs, were detected in 89.7%, 87.4%, and 87.9% of vaccinated individuals, respectively, and in 37.5%, 32.3%, and 32.3% of COVID-19 patients, respectively. There was a significant correlation between anti-spike IgG and anti-RBD IgG levels and NAs in both COVID-19-infected and vaccinated individuals. The mean concentrations of anti-spike and RBD IgGs were higher in vaccinated individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection compared to those without prior infection. Conclusions: The antibody profile for IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 suggests that as time passes after the onset of disease symptoms, the seropositivity in COVID-19 patients increases. Furthermore, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are produced more efficiently through COVID-19 vaccination than natural infection.","PeriodicalId":505511,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":"40 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid-140414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inducing a humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 may partially control virus dissemination. However, there is a lack of consistency in the reported kinetics of IgM and IgG responses to SARS-CoV-2. Additionally, the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 may differ from that elicited by vaccination. Therefore, we were motivated to evaluate the kinetics of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in both infected and vaccinated individuals. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the seroconversion patterns of specific antibodies against various antigens of SARS-CoV-2 in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and vaccinated individuals, focusing specifically on comparing the humoral responses elicited by infection and vaccination. Methods: Serial blood and swab samples were collected from 134 COVID-19 patients at six time points following admission. Real-time RT-PCR specific for SARS-CoV-2, as well as anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG, were tested using ELISA. Additionally, 141 serum samples were obtained from vaccinated individuals. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike and RBD IgGs, along with neutralizing antibodies (NAs), were assessed using ELISA in both the vaccinated group and 96 COVID-19 patients. Results: Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgM was found positive in 23.3% of patients at 0 - 7 days after symptom onset, with seropositivity increasing to 71.7% at 15 - 21 days. Subsequently, IgM positivity gradually decreased to 62.7% at > 28 days post-symptom onset. Meanwhile, anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG was positive in 28.3% of patients at 0 -7 days, rising to 83.7% at 22 - 28 days after symptom onset, and remained constant thereafter. Anti-spike and RBD IgGs, along with NAs, were detected in 89.7%, 87.4%, and 87.9% of vaccinated individuals, respectively, and in 37.5%, 32.3%, and 32.3% of COVID-19 patients, respectively. There was a significant correlation between anti-spike IgG and anti-RBD IgG levels and NAs in both COVID-19-infected and vaccinated individuals. The mean concentrations of anti-spike and RBD IgGs were higher in vaccinated individuals with a history of COVID-19 infection compared to those without prior infection. Conclusions: The antibody profile for IgM and IgG against SARS-CoV-2 suggests that as time passes after the onset of disease symptoms, the seropositivity in COVID-19 patients increases. Furthermore, antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 are produced more efficiently through COVID-19 vaccination than natural infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查 COVID-19 住院患者和疫苗接种者针对 SARS-CoV-2 不同抗原的特异性抗体的血清转换模式
背景:诱导对 SARS-CoV-2 的体液反应可部分控制病毒传播。然而,所报道的对 SARS-CoV-2 的 IgM 和 IgG 反应动力学缺乏一致性。此外,对 SARS-CoV-2 的体液反应可能与疫苗接种引起的反应不同。因此,我们决定评估感染者和接种者体内针对 SARS-CoV-2 的抗体动力学。研究目的本研究旨在调查住院的 COVID-19 患者和接种疫苗者体内针对 SARS-CoV-2 不同抗原的特异性抗体的血清转换模式,特别侧重于比较感染和接种疫苗引起的体液反应。研究方法在 134 名 COVID-19 患者入院后的 6 个时间点采集了连续的血液和拭子样本。采用 ELISA 方法对 SARS-CoV-2 的特异性实时 RT-PCR 以及抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG 进行了检测。此外,还从接种过疫苗的患者中采集了 141 份血清样本。使用 ELISA 方法评估了疫苗接种组和 96 名 COVID-19 患者的抗 SARS-CoV-2 穗状抗体和 RBD IgG 以及中和抗体 (NAs)。结果显示症状出现后 0-7 天,23.3% 的患者发现抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 阳性,15-21 天时血清阳性率增至 71.7%。随后,IgM 阳性率在症状出现后超过 28 天时逐渐下降至 62.7%。同时,抗 SARS-CoV-2 IgG 阳性率在发病后 0 - 7 天为 28.3%,在发病后 22 - 28 天升至 83.7%,此后保持不变。在 89.7%、87.4% 和 87.9% 的疫苗接种者中,以及在 37.5%、32.3% 和 32.3% 的 COVID-19 患者中,分别检测到抗尖峰抗体和 RBD IgG 以及 NAs。COVID-19 感染者和疫苗接种者的抗穗IgG和抗RBD IgG水平与NAs之间存在明显的相关性。与无COVID-19感染史的人相比,接种过疫苗的人抗尖头穗状病毒IgG和抗RBD IgG的平均浓度更高。结论针对 SARS-CoV-2 的 IgM 和 IgG 抗体谱表明,随着疾病症状出现后时间的推移,COVID-19 患者的血清阳性率会升高。此外,通过接种 COVID-19 疫苗产生的 SARS-CoV-2 抗体比自然感染更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the Seroprevalence of Varicella zoster Virus in Young Adults Aged 15 – 35 Years Old in Mashhad, Iran Steroid-Induced Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) in HIV Patient: A Paradoxical Effect Risk Factors of Pulmonary Complications in Patients with COVID-19: A Case-Control Study A Case Report of Disseminated Nocardiosis in a Patient with HIV Infection: Concurrent Liver, Pulmonary, and Brain Involvements A Case Report of Disseminated Nocardiosis in a Patient with HIV Infection: Concurrent Liver, Pulmonary, and Brain Involvements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1