Latent profiles of challenge, hindrance, and threat appraisals on time pressure and job complexity: Antecedents and outcomes

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Australian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2024-02-04 DOI:10.1177/03128962231222825
A. Kunzelmann, Thomas Rigotti, Monique F. Crane
{"title":"Latent profiles of challenge, hindrance, and threat appraisals on time pressure and job complexity: Antecedents and outcomes","authors":"A. Kunzelmann, Thomas Rigotti, Monique F. Crane","doi":"10.1177/03128962231222825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research challenges the a priori classification of time pressure and job complexity as challenge stressors and seeks to illuminate the emergence of different appraisal configurations using a latent profile approach. The sample consisted of 629 employees (66.1% male). Employees who appraised time pressure and job complexity as challenges reported higher job satisfaction and work engagement and felt less emotionally exhausted and mentally stressed compared to those with dominant hindrance/threat appraisals. Employees who report to be more resilient and have autonomy are more likely to fall into a Dominant Challenge Appraisal profile. Those who face high emotional demands are more likely to be in a Dominant Hindrance/Threat Appraisal profile. This research offers a fresh perspective on why it is essential for employers to consider their teams’ perceptions and resources when introducing new tasks or deadlines. By providing employees with adequate resources, organizations can promote a more adaptive approach to work challenges. JEL Classification: L20, L29, L00","PeriodicalId":47209,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231222825","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research challenges the a priori classification of time pressure and job complexity as challenge stressors and seeks to illuminate the emergence of different appraisal configurations using a latent profile approach. The sample consisted of 629 employees (66.1% male). Employees who appraised time pressure and job complexity as challenges reported higher job satisfaction and work engagement and felt less emotionally exhausted and mentally stressed compared to those with dominant hindrance/threat appraisals. Employees who report to be more resilient and have autonomy are more likely to fall into a Dominant Challenge Appraisal profile. Those who face high emotional demands are more likely to be in a Dominant Hindrance/Threat Appraisal profile. This research offers a fresh perspective on why it is essential for employers to consider their teams’ perceptions and resources when introducing new tasks or deadlines. By providing employees with adequate resources, organizations can promote a more adaptive approach to work challenges. JEL Classification: L20, L29, L00
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关于时间压力和工作复杂性的挑战、阻碍和威胁评估的潜在概况:前因后果
本研究对先验地将时间压力和工作复杂性归类为挑战压力源的做法提出了质疑,并试图利用潜在特征描述法来阐明不同评估配置的出现。样本包括 629 名员工(66.1% 为男性)。将时间压力和工作复杂性视为挑战的员工的工作满意度和工作投入度较高,与那些对阻碍/威胁评价占主导地位的员工相比,他们更少感到情绪疲惫和精神压力。认为自己更有韧性和自主权的员工更有可能属于主导型挑战评价。而那些面临高情感要求的员工则更有可能属于主导型阻碍/威胁评价。这项研究提供了一个全新的视角,说明为什么雇主在引入新任务或最后期限时,必须考虑团队的看法和资源。通过为员工提供充足的资源,组织可以促进员工以更具适应性的方式应对工作挑战。JEL 分类:L20, L29, L00
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The objectives of the Australian Journal of Management are to encourage and publish research in the field of management. The terms management and research are both broadly defined. The former includes the management of firms, groups, industries, regulatory bodies, government, and other institutions. The latter encompasses both discipline- and problem-based research. Consistent with the policy, the Australian Journal of Management publishes research in accounting, applied economics, finance, industrial relations, political science, psychology, statistics, and other disciplines, provided the application is to management, as well as research in areas such as marketing, corporate strategy, operations management, organisation development, decision analysis, and other problem-focuses paradigms.
期刊最新文献
The effectiveness of brief workplace compassion-focussed training in improving wellbeing of stressed school employees Not just a ‘nice to have’: Team compassionate care behaviours and patient safety Entrepreneurial functions performed by women entrepreneurs: Do incubators make a difference? The impact of board composition and internationalisation on strategic change: Longitudinal empirical evidence The Economic and Labour Relations Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1